229
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Balancing excellence and diversity in higher education? The role of the Chinese first-level discipline evaluation scheme

, & ORCID Icon
Pages 208-230 | Received 08 Mar 2019, Accepted 29 Jun 2019, Published online: 19 Jul 2019

References

  • Aagaard, K., C. Bloch, and J. W. Schneider. 2015. “Impacts of Performance-Based Research Funding Systems: The Case of the Norwegian Publication Indicator.” Research Evaluation 24: 106–117. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvv003
  • Bai, Q. 2018. “The Logical Basis and Path Selection for Building a ‘Double First-Class’ University with Chinese Characteristics.” Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition) 6: 208–216.
  • Birnbaum, R. 1983. Maintaining Diversity in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • Cai, K. 2001. “Concept of Quality Under Massification: The Combination of Diversity and Unity.” Journal of Higher Education 4: 7–9.
  • Cheng, Y. 2011. “A Reflection on the Effects of the 985 Project.” Chinese Education and Society 44/5: 19–30.
  • Clark, B. R. 1983. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Daraio, C., and A. Bonaccorsi. 2007. Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation: Specialization and Performance in Europe. Cheltenham: Edvard Elgar.
  • Dill, D. D., and M. Beerkens. 2010. Public Policy for Academic Quality: Analyses of Innovative Policy Instruments. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Dong, Y. 2013. “Same Concept with Different Semantic Meanings: Diversity Research Project in Higher Education.” Higher Education Development and Evaluation 29/1: 57–61.
  • Dong, Z., and W. Chen. 2010. “‘The Diversity and Unity of China’s Higher Education Quality Standards.” Journal of Higher Education 6: 20–24.
  • Dougherty, K. J., S. M. Jones, H. Lahr, R. S., Natow, L. Pheatt, and V. Reddy. 2016. Performance Funding for Higher Education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Du, Y. 2017. “How to Build Double First Rate with Chinese Characteristics.” China Higher Education 19: 11–13.
  • Enders, J., H. De Boer, and E. Weyer. 2013. “Regulatory Autonomy and Performance: The Reform of Higher Education Revisited.” Higher Education 65: 5–23. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9578-4
  • Fadeeva, Z., and Y. Mochizuki. 2010. “Higher Education for Today and Tomorrow: University Appraisal for Diversity, Innovation and Change Towards Sustainable Development.” Sustainability Science 5: 249–256. doi: 10.1007/s11625-010-0106-0
  • Feng, Y., and X. Zhao. 2011. “The ‘Double First-Class’ Strategies in China: Conceptual Framework, Classification Feature and Evaluation Standard.” Modern Management 1: 12–15. doi: 10.4236/mm.2011.11003
  • Fumasoli, T., and J. Huisman. 2013. “Strategic Agency and System Diversity: Conceptualizing Institutional Positioning in Higher Education.” Minerva 51: 155–169. doi: 10.1007/s11024-013-9225-y
  • Goedegebuure, L. C. J., V. L. Meek, O. Kivinen, and R. Rinne. 1996. “On Diversity, Differentiation and Convergence.” In The Mockers and Mocked: Comparative Perspectives on Differentiation, Convergence and Diversity in Higher Education, edited by V. L. Meek, L. Goedegebuure, O. Kivinen, and R. Rinne, 2–14. Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Gornitzka, Å, B. Stensaker, J.-C. Smeby, and H. De Boer. 2004. “Contract Arrangements in the Nordic Countries – Solving the Efficiency/Effectiveness Dilemma?” Higher Education in Europe 29: 87–101. doi: 10.1080/03797720410001673319
  • Gu, M. 2001. “Diversity of Higher Education and Quality.” China Higher Education 9: 17–18.
  • Guan, H., and H. Zhang. 2018. “The Institutional Constraints for University Autonomy of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics.” Journal of Educational Science of Hunan Normal University 4: 22–27.
  • Hazelkorn, E. 2015. Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education: The Battle for World-Class Excellence. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • He, X., and J. Chi. 2018. “The Element Analysis of China Higher Education Structure Formation and Evolution Mechanism.” Journal of Higher Eudcation 39/11: 25–29 +41.
  • Huisman, J. 1995. Differentiation, Diversity, and Dependency in Higher Education: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Utrecht: Uitgeverij Lemma BV.
  • Huisman, J., B. Lepori, M. Seeber, N. Frølich, and L. Scordato. 2015. “Measuring Institutional Diversity Across Higher Education Systems.” Research Evaluation 24: 369–379. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvv021
  • Huisman, J., L. Meek, and F. Wood. 2007. “Institutional Diversity in Higher Education: Across-National and Longitudinal Analysis.” Higher Education Quarterly 61: 563–577. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2007.00372.x
  • Kang, N., Q. L. Zhang, and H. B. Su. 2016. “The Historical Logic of the Transformation of ‘Project 985’ and the Implementation of ‘Scheme Double First Class’.” Tsinghua Journal of Education 37/5: 76–78.
  • Lei, Q. 2004. “Diversity: The Key to the Development of China’s Higher Education.” Tsinghua Journal of Education 25/2: 16–18.
  • Li, M. 2008. “The Orientation of Higher Education Institutions in the Process of the Higher Education Massification in China.” China Higher Education 1: 73–75.
  • Liu, Q. 2015. “Reflections on the Controversy Over the Necessity of the ‘211 Project’ and the ‘985 Project’.” Journal of Higher Education Management 3: 96–99. +125.
  • Liu, S. Y. 2016. Quality Assurance and Institutional Transformation. The Chinese Experience. Singapore: Springer.
  • Lu, X., and L. Yang. 2018. “On the Chinese Characteristics and World-Class Standards of ‘Double First-Class’ Construction.” Journal of National Academy of Education Administration 249/9: 22–29.
  • Maassen, P., Å Gornitzka, and T. Fumasoli. 2017. “University Reform and Institutional Autonomy: A Framework for Analysing the Living Autonomy.” Higher Education Quarterly 71: 239–250. doi: 10.1111/hequ.12129
  • Maassen, P., and J. P. Olsen. 2007. University Dynamics and European Integration. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Maassen, P., and B. Stensaker. 2011. “The Knowledge Triangle, European Higher Education Policy Logics and Policy Implications.” Higher Education 61: 757–769. doi: 10.1007/s10734-010-9360-4
  • Merton, R. K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Science 3810: 58–63.
  • Morphew, Christopher C. 2009. “Conceptualizing Change in the Institutional Diversity of U.S. Colleges and Universities.” The Journal of Higher Education 80: 243–269. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2009.11779012
  • Neave, G., and F. van Vught. 1991. Prometheus Bound: The Changing Relationship Between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe. Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Nong, W., and W. Liao. 2003. “The Diversification of Interest Entity and the Reformation of Higher Education Evaluation System.” Research On Education Tsinghua University 24/4: 98–103.
  • Pan, J. 2010. “Classification of Institutions of Higher Learning: an Important Guide for the Diversified Development of Higher Education.” Research in Educational Development 7: 5–5.
  • Paradeise, C., E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, and E. Ferlie. 2009. University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Parsons, T., and G. M. Platt. 1973. The American University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • People. Cn. 2014. “ Employment Discrimination – A Glass Wall in Front of Graduates”. Accessed 12 December 2017 (pubd online June 2014). http://edu.people.com.cn/n/2014/0613/c1053-25144891.html.
  • Peters, B. G. 2001. The Future of Governing. Second Edition, Revised. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
  • Ramezanpour, S., and T. Nithyanantham. 2011. “From Diversity in Higher Education Institutions to Improving Sustainable Development.” Surgical Endoscopy 13/4: 397–400.
  • Rhoades, G. 1990. “Political Competition and Differentiation in Higher Education.” In Differentiation Theory and Social Change, edited by J. C. Alexander, and P. Colony, 187–221. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Riesman, D. 1956. Constraint and Variety in American Education. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Salmi, J. 2016. “Excellence Initiatives to Create World-Class Universities” International Higher Education 87 (Fall): 17–18. doi: 10.6017/ihe.2016.87.9506
  • Stensaker, B. 2011. “Accreditation of Higher Education in Europe – Moving Towards the US Model?” Journal Of Education Policy 26: 757–769. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2010.551785
  • van Vught, F. 1996. “Isomorphism in Higher Education? Towards a Theory of Differentiation and Diversity in Higher Education Systems.” In The Mockers and Mocked: Comparative Perspectives on Differentiation, Convergence and Diversity in Higher Education, edited by V. L. Meek, L. Goedegebuure, O. Kivinen, and R. Rinne, 42–59. Oxford: Pergamon.
  • van Vught, F. 2008. “Mission Diversity and Reputation in Higher Education.” Higher Education Policy 21: 151–174. doi: 10.1057/hep.2008.5
  • Wang, W. 1993. “Towards Diversity: the General Trend of China’s Higher Education Reform.” Jiangsu Higher Education 4: 9–12.
  • Wang, C., and Q. Zha. 2016. “Diversity Measurement of China’s Higher Education System Based on Cluster Analysis.” Statistics & Decision 19: 32–36.
  • Wang, J., J. Zhang, and Y. Peng. 2019. “On the Development of World-Class Universities with Chinese Characteristics in the New Era – Studying the CPC Central Committee’s General Secretary Xi Jinping’s Important Expositions on Education.” Educational Research 40/3: 4–11.
  • Westerheijden, D., B. Stensaker, and M. Rosa. 2007. Quality Assurance In Higher Education: Trends in Regulation, Translation and Transformation. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Wu, H. 2018. “From Centralism to Pluralism: The Changes of China’s Higher Education Evaluation Policy From Perspective of Legitimacy Theory.” Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education 292/8: 40–44.
  • Xie, Y., L. Liu, and N. Liu. 2010. “Diversity: The Key of the European Classification of Higher Education Institutions.” Comparative Education Review 4: 41–46.
  • Xinhua Daily Telegraph. 2013. “ Academic Discrimination Originated from the Concept of Deformity”. Accessed 12 December 2017 (pubd online April 2013). http://rencai.people.com.cn/n/2013/0419/c244807-21198006.html.
  • Xu, J. H. 2015. “The Research of ‘Movement Thinking’ to Build the World First-Class University.” Modern Education Management 1: 63–67.
  • Zhai, Y., and Q. Wang. 2017. “On the Perfection of Evaluation of Disciplines in the Context of ‘Double First-Class Construction’.” Research On Education Tsinghua University 6: 45–51.
  • Zhang, Y. Q. 2015. “Policy Analysis of High Level University Construction – From the View of 985, 211 Project and 2011 Plan.” Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Science Edition) 15/5: 122–126.
  • Zhang, J., and L. Qin. 2018. “Discipline Assessment Benefits ‘Double First-Class’ University Development in Philosophy, Purpose and Mechanism.” Journal of Graduate Education 44/2: 71–75.
  • Zhang, C., and Z. Su. 2016. “The Internal Contradiction and Coordination Governance Path of Academic Autonomy and Bureaucracy in Chinese Universities.” Modern Education Management 5: 59–63.
  • Zhou, J., and J. Zhang. 2018. “Mutual Complementation and Co-Governance: Institutional Balance Between Discipline Evaluation and First-Class Disciplines Construction.” Higher Education Development and Evaluation 6: 1–8.
  • Zhou, L., and G. Zhou. 2009. “Reform of Policy Paradigm of Higher Education Evaluation in China.” Higher Education Exploration 4: 46–49.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.