Socio-economic rights and anthropology? The case of Deaf people who use South African Sign Language (SASL) in a university setting

References

• (American Anthropology Association) 1947. Statement on human rights. American Anthropologist 49(4):539–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertyn, C. 2006. Conclusion, in Reflections on Democracy and human rights: a decade of the South African Constitution (Act 108, 1996), pp 191–198. Published by the South African Human Rights Commission, http://www.sahrc.org.za.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin-Ragaven, L. 1998. Prioritising human rights training for health professionals (reportage). S Afr Med J 88:1377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, H., Boonzaier, E., Owen, J. 2005. Fieldwork in shared spaces: positionality, power and ethics of citizen anthropologists in southern Africa. Anthropology Southern Africa 28 (3&4): 123–132.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. 1973. Godfrey Wilson and the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute, in T. Asad (ed). Anthropology and the colonial encounter. London: Ithaca Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cape Argus. October 20, 2006:2. Agreement ends Richtersveld case
   Google Scholar
• Cape Times. October 27, 2006:5. Richtersvelders to receive reparations of R190m
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. 1989. Human rights and cultural relativism: the need for a new approach. American Anthropologist 91(4): 1014–1017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, J. 2005. Reflections on liberalism, policulturalism and ideology: citizenship and difference in South Africa, in S. Robins (ed). Human rights, culture and context: anthropological perspectives, pp 33–56. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. 1996. No 108. Government Gazette. Vol 378, No 17678. Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, J. K., M-B. Dembour and R. A. Wilson (eds). 2001. Anthropological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. 2006. Judge for Yourself. A weekly Sunday evening television programme, ETV, March 12.
   Google Scholar
• De Jongh, M. 2002. No fixed abode: the poorest of the poor and identities in rural South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies 28(2):44l–460.
   Google Scholar
• Drennan, G. and Swartz, L. 2002. The paradoxical use of interpreting in psychiatry. Social Science and Medicine 54:1853–1899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, K. 2001. From skepticism to embrace: human rights and the American Anthropology Association, 1947–1999. Human Rights Quarterly 23:536–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodale, M. 2006. Introduction to ‘Anthropology and Human Rights in a New Key’. American Anthropologist 108(1):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. and Spiegel, A. 1993. South Africa revisited. Annual Review of Anthropology 22:83–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others v. Grootboom and Others 2000 (II) BCLR 1169 (CC) http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/uhtbin/cgisirsi/x/0/5/0.
   Google Scholar
• Heap, M. 2003. Crossing social boundaries and dispersing social identity: tracing Deaf networks from Cape Town. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Stellenbosch University.
   Google Scholar
• Heap, M. 2006. Sign-deaf spaces. The Deaf in Cape Town creating community, crossing boundaries and constructing identity. Anthropology Southern Africa 29(1/2):5–44.
   Google Scholar
• Heap, M. and Morgans, H. 2006. Language policy and South African Sign Language: Interpreters in the public service, in B. Watermeyer; L. Swartz; T. Lorenzo; M. Schneider and M. Priestley (eds). Disability and social change a South African Agenda. Pretoria: HSRC.
   Google Scholar
• Heap, M., Bloch, J., Chan, C., Jacobs, B., Mhlanga, S. 2006. Feeling freedom. Professional interpreters in health care: insights from Deaf people who use South African Sign language (SASL)—and Guidelines for health professionals. Oral Presentation, 3rd Public Health Conference, Johannesburg May 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández—Truyol and Esperanza. B (eds). 2002. Moral imperialism: A critical Anthology. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, M. 1936. Reaction to conquest. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landsman, C. and Mackay, S. 2006. South Africa 1994–2004, in Reflections on democracy and human rights: a decade of the South African Constitution (Act 108, 1996), pp 1–14. Published by the South African Human Rights Commission. URL: http://www.sahrc.org.za.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, K. 2004. Aboriginal title, indigenous rights and the right to culture. South African Journal of Human Rights 30:86–118.
   Google Scholar
• Liebenberg, S. and Pillay, K. (eds). 2000. Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa. A Resource Book. The Socio- Economic Rights Project, Community Law Centre, University of the Western Cape.
   Google Scholar
• London, L.; McCarthy, G.; van Heerden, J.; Wedee, S.; Walaza, N. and Winslow, T. 1997. Preparing future doctors to meet ethical challenges: a training course for medical students in health and human rights. S Afr Med J 87:242–245.
   Google Scholar
• Malan, N. 2005. Civil society and the right to have access to social security in South Africa. Development Southern Africa 22(4):549–567.
   Google Scholar
• Maikki, I. 1992. National geographic: the rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. Cultural anthropology 24(28):7
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S. 2003. Human rights law and the demonisation of culture (and anthropology along the way). Polar: political and legal anthropology review 26(1):55–77.
   Google Scholar
• Messer, E. 1993. Anthropology and human rights. Annual Review of Anthropology 22:229–241.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S. Falk. 1993. Changing perspectives on a changing Africa: the work of anthropology, in R. Bates, V. Mudimbe, and J. O'Barr (eds). Africa and the disciplines: the contributions of research in Africa to the social sciences and humanities, pp 3–57. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. 2001. Barriers to justice. Deaf people and the courts. Law, Race and Gender Research Unit, UCT.
   Google Scholar
• Ortner, S. 1984. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History 26(1): 126–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padden, C. and Humphries, T. 1988. Deaf in America: voices from a culture. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pillay, K. 1999. Access to health care services: language as a barrier. Socio Economic Rights Newsletter. Community Law Centre. University of the Western Cape. September.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, G. 1990. Writing post-orientalist histories of the Third World: perspectives from Indian historiography. Comparative studies of society and history 32(2):382–408.
   Google Scholar
• Preis, A-B. 1996. Human rights as cultural practice: an anthropological critique. Human Rights Quarterly 18:286–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rée, J. 2000. I see a voice: a philosophical history. London: Flamingo (first published 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Renteln, A. 1988. Relativism and the search for human rights. American Anthropologist 90(1):56–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, S. 2006. From ‘rights’ to ‘ritual’: AIDS activism in South Africa. American Anthropologist 108 (2):312–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, F. 2002. Bearing witness: women and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2000. Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. and Boonzaier, E. 1994. Ethnic identity as performance: lessons from Namaqualand. Journal of Southern African Studies 20(3):405–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skweyiya, T.L. 2003. Excerpt from an interview. Constitutional Court URL: http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/text/judges/transcripts/skweyiya.html.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel, A. D. 2006. Reproducing criticality and a sense of marginality: South African anthropology's contemporary challenge. Paper presented at the Conference: Transcending postcolonial conditions: towards alternative modernities, December 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Truth and Reconciliation Commission Report 1998. Volume Four, Chapter Five. Institutional Hearings: The Health Sector, pp 109–164. Cape Town: CTP Book Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, T. 1993. Anthropology and multiculturalism. What is anthropology that multiculturalists should be mindful of it? Cultural Anthropology 8(4):411–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, T. 1997 Human rights, human, difference: anthropology's contribution to an emancipatory cultural politics. Journal of Anthropological Research 53(3):273–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Waal, CS. and Ward, V 2006. Shifting paradigms in the new South Africa. Anthropology after the merger of two disciplinary associations. Anthropology Today 22(1): 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Washburn, W. E. 1987. Cultural Relativism, human rights and the AAA. American Anthropologist 89(4):939–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. A. (ed). 1997. Human rights, culture and context. Anthropological perspectives. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. A 2001. The politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa. Legitimizing the apartheid state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. A. 2006. Afterword to ‘Anthropology and Human Rights in a New Key’. American Anthropologist 108(1):77–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. and Mitchell, J. 2003. Introduction: the social life of rights, in R. Wilson and J. Mitchell (eds). Human rights in global perspective: anthropological studies of rights, claims and entitlements, pp 1–13. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar