The ancestral land debate prior to and during Namibia’s Second National Land Conference: the redistribution-recognition dilemma

References

• ACHPR (African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights). 2010. Advisory Opinion of the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People. Adopted at its 41st Ordinary Session held in May 2007 in Accra, Ghana. https://www.iwgia.org/images/publications//0460_ACHPR_Advisory_Op-UNDRIP_UK_2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, C. 2008. “Collapsing Categories: Fraser on Economy, Culture and Justice.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (4): 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453708088511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atuahene, B. 2010. “Property and Transitional Justice.” UCLA Law Review Discourse, no. 58: 65–93.
   Google Scholar
• Bizos, G. 2007. Odyssey to Freedom: A Memoir by the World-Renowned Human Rights Advocate, Friend and Lawyer to Nelson Mandela. Cape Town: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Barume, A.K. 2014. Land Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Africa: With Special Focus on Central, Eastern and Southern Africa. Copenhagen. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce J.W., with S. Holt. 2011. Land and Conflict Prevention. Colchester: Initiative on Quiet Diplomacy, University of Essex. http://www.iqdiplomacy.org/images/stories/handbook/pdf/land_iqd6_02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Du Pisani, A. 1985. SWA/Namibia: The Politics of Continuity and Change. Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball.
   Google Scholar
• Emmett, T. 1999. Popular Resistance and the Roots of Nationalism in Namibia. Basel: Schlettwein Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, J.A. 2018. “Amazonian Struggles for Recognition.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 43 (4): 718–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1997. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harring, S.L., and W. Odendaal. 2002. “One Day We Will All Be Equal … ”: A Socio-Legal Perspective on the Namibian Land Reform and Land Resettlement Process. Windhoek: Legal Assistance Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Hongslo, E., and T.A. Benjaminsen. 2002. “Turning Landscapes into ‘Nothing’: A Narrative on Land Reform in Namibia.” Forum for Development Studies 29 (2): 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2002.9666210
   Google Scholar
• Howard-Hassmann, R.E. 2013. “Reconsidering the Right to Own Property.” Journal of Human Rights 12 (2): 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2013.784667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard-Hassmann, R.E., and A.P. Lombardo. 2007 “Framing Reparations Claims: Differences between the African and Jewish Social Movements for Reparations.” African Studies Review 50 (1): 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1353/arw.2005.0107
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. 2004. “Who Should Own the Land? An Introduction.” In Who Should Own the Land? Analyses and Views on Land Reform and the Land Question in Namibia and Southern Africa, edited by J. Hunter, 1–7. Windhoek: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung and Namibia Institute for Democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Kaapama, P. 2007. “Commercial Land Reforms in Postcolonial Namibia: What Happened to Liberation Struggle Rhetoric?” In Transitions in Namibia: Which Change for Whom?, edited by H. Melber, 29–49. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kaapama, P. 2010. “Politics of the Land Question in Post Settler, Colonial Africa: Some Comparative Explorations of Zimbabwe, Kenya, Namibia and South Africa.” In The Long Aftermath of War: Reconciliation and Transition in Namibia, edited by A. du Pisani, R. Kössler, and W.A. Lindeke, 171–214. Freiburg: Arnold Bergstraesser Institut.
   Google Scholar
• Kariuki, S.M. 2004. “Can Negotiated Land Reforms Deliver? A Case of Kenya’s, South Africa’s and Zimbabwe’s Land Reform Policy Debates.” African Studies Centre Working Paper 59, University of Leiden. https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/489
   Google Scholar
• Mbuende K. 1986. Namibia, the Broken Shield: Anatomy of Imperialism and Revolution. Malmo: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Melber H. 2019. “Colonialism, Land, Ethnicity and Class: Namibia after the Second National Land Conference.” Africa Spectrum 54 (1): 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002039719848506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyo, S., and R. Hall. 2004. “Conflict and Land Reform in Southern Africa.” Paper presented at the Centre for Conflict Resolution policy seminar on the “Political Economy of Post-Apartheid South Africa and its Conflict Management and Economic Role in Africa,” Cape Town, July 30–August 1.
   Google Scholar
• Musila, G.M. 2009. “Options for Transitional Justice in Kenya: Autonomy and the Challenge of External Prescriptions.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 3 (3): 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijp018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pankhurst, D. 1999. “Issues of Justice and Reconciliation in Complex Political Emergencies: Conceptualizing Reconciliation, Justice and Peace.” Third World Quarterly 20 (1): 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599914027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, S.B., S.A. Wolf, and W. Wendy. 2016. “Knowledge and the Politics of Land.” Environment and Planning 8 (4): 616–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15604171
   Google Scholar
• Ramanathapillai, R. 2008. “Modern Warfare and the Spiritual Disconnection from Land.” Peace Review 20 (1): 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402650701873825
   Google Scholar
• Republic of Namibia. 1991. National Conference on Land Reform and the Land Question: Consensus Document. Windhoek: Republic of Namibia.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of Namibia. 2018a. Advisory Position Paper to Government in Preparation for the Second National Land Conference: Draft Report on GRN Position Paper. Windhoek (1):04.09.18.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of Namibia. 2018b. Draft Programme for the 2nd National Land Conference. Windhoek. Republic of Namibia. 2018c. Resolutions of the Second National Land Conference, 1st–5th October 2018. Windhoek. http://196.216.167.74/landconference/submissions_2018/Resolutions_2nd_National_Land_Conference_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schaap A. 2001. “Guilty Subjects and Political Responsibility: Arendt, Jaspers and the Resonance of the ‘German Question’ in Politics of Reconciliation.” Political Studies 49 (4): 749–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjiriange, N. 2018. “Shanyengana’s Ancestral Land Comments Inflammatory.” New Era, September 28, 16. https://neweralive.na/posts/shanyenganas-ancestral-land-comments-inflammatory
   Google Scholar
• Valverde M. 2006. “The Sociology of Law as a ‘Means against Struggle Itself.’” Social and Legal Studies 15 (4): 591–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663906069551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wingerden, H. 1996. “I Don’t Want any Nonsense in my Courtyard!”: The Position of Women in Subia Family Law. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Vigne, R. 1975. A Dwelling Place of Our Own: The Story of the Namibian Nation. London: International Defence and Aid Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, F.-N. 1991. Precolonial Communities of Southwestern Africa: A History of Owambo Kingdoms, 1600–1920. Windhoek: National Archives of Namibia.
   Google Scholar