SP₃ Limit of the 2D/1D Transport Equations with Varying Degrees of Angular Coupling

References

• Askew, J. R. 1972. A characteristics formulation of the neutron transport equation in complicated geometry. Technical Report AEEW-M-1108. Winfirth, UK: UKAEA.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, J. Y., H. G. Joo, K. S. Kim, and S. Q. Zee. 2002a. Three-dimensional heterogeneous whole core transport calculation employing planar MOC solutions. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society 87:234–6.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, J. Y., K. S. Kim, and C. C. Lee. 2006. Error quantification of the axial nodal diffusion kernel of the DeCART code. In Proc. PHYSOR 2006, Vancouver, BC, Canada, September.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, J. Y., K. S. Kim, C. C. Lee, S. Q. Zee, and H. G. Joo. 2007. Axial SPN and radial MOC coupled whole core transport calculation. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology 44 (9):1156–71. doi:10.1080/18811248.2007.9711359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, N. Z., G. S. Lee, and C. J. Park. 2002b. Fusion of method of characteristics and nodal method for 3-D whole-core transport calculation. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society 86:322–24.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, B. S., S. G. Stimpson, B. W. Kelley, M. T. Young, B. M. Kochunas, A. Graham, E. W. Larsen, T. J. Downar, and A. Godfrey. 2016. Stability and accuracy of 3D neutron transport simulations using the 2D/1D method in MPACT. Journal of Computational Physics 326:612–28. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2016.08.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelbard, E. M. Simplified spherical harmonics equations and their use in shielding problems. Technical Report WAPD-T-1182. Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory, USA, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Gunow, G.,. S. Shaner, W. Boyd, B. Forget, 2017. and, and K. Smith. Accuracy and performance of 3D MOC for full-core PWR problems. In Proc. M&C 2017, Jeju, Korea, April 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrett, M. G., B. M. Kochunas, E. W. Larsen, and T. J. Downar. 2018. Improved accuracy in the 2D/1D method with anisotropic transverse leakage and cross-section homogenization. Nuclear Science and Engineering 192 (3):219–39. doi:10.1080/00295639.2018.1507186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrett, M.G., B.M. Kochunas, E.W. Larsen, and T.J. Downar. 2019. Polar parity for efficient evaluation of anisotropic transverse leakage in the 2D/1D transport method. Nuclear Science and Engineering 193 (12):1291–309. doi:10.1080/00295639.2019.1627176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrett, M. G. 2018a. SP3_solver_FD: Finite difference diffusion and SP3 solver, July. https://github.com/mgjarrett/SP3_solver_FD.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrett, M. G. 2018b. SP3_limit: Calculating SP3 limit for 2D/1D methods, September. https://github.com/mgjarrett/SP3_limit.
   Google Scholar
• Joo, H. G., J. Y. Cho, K. S. Kim, C. C. Lee, and S. Q. Zee. 2004. Methods and performance of a three-dimensional whole core transport code decart. In Proc. PHYSOR 2004, Chicago, IL, USA, April 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, B. W., and E. W. Larsen. 2013. 2D/1D approximations to the 3D neutron transport equation. I: Theory. In Proc. M&C 2013, Sun Valley, ID, USA, May 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, B. W. 2015. An investigation of 2D/1D approximations to the 3D Boltzmann transport equation. PhD. thesis, University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Koebke, K. 1981. Advances in homogenization and dehomogenization. In Proc. M&C 1981, Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, T., Y. Xu, T. Downar, and D. J. Lee. 2011. Cell homogenization method for pin-by-pin neutron transport calculations. Nuclear Science and Engineering 169 (1):1–18. doi:10.13182/NSE08-85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, E. E., M. A. Smith, and B. C. Na. 2006. Benchmark on deterministic 3-d mox fuel assembly transport calculations without spatial homogenization. Progress in Nuclear Energy 48 (5):381–2. doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2006.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litskevich, D., and B. Merk. 2014. SP3 solution versus diffusion solution in pin-by-pin calculations and conclusions concerning advanced methods. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Transport 43 (1-7):214–39. doi:10.1080/00411450.2014.913184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin-Lafleche, A., M. A. Smith, and C. H. Lee. 2013. PROTEUS-MOC: A 3D deterministic solver incorporating 2D method of characteristics. In Proc. M&C 2013, Sun Valley, ID, USA, May 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• McClarren, R. G. 2010. Theoretical aspects of the simplified pn equations. Transport Theory and Statistical Physics 39 (2–4):73–109. doi:10.1080/00411450.2010.535088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandya, T. M., S. R. Johnson, G. G. Davidson, T. M. Evans, and S. P. Hamilton. 2015. SHIFT: A massively parallel monte carlo radiation transport package. In Proc. M&C 2015, Nashville, TN, USA, April 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Romano, P. K., B. Herman, N. Horelik, A. Nelson, B. Forget, and K. Smith. 2015. OpenMC: A state-of-the-art Monte Carlo code for research and development. Annals of Nuclear Energy 82:90–7. doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2014.07.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimpson, S. G., B. S. Collins, and T. J. Downar. 2017. A 2-D/1-D transverse leakage approximation based on azimuthal, fourier moments. Nuclear Science and Engineering 185(2):243–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeda, T., and H. Ikeda. 1991. 3-D Neutron transport benchmarks. Nuclear Science and Technology 28 (7):656–69.
   Google Scholar
• Yuk, S., and N. Z. Cho. 2015. Whole-core transport solutions with 2-D/1-D fusion kernel via p-cmfd acceleration and p-cmfd embedding of nonoverlapping local/global iterations. Nuclear Science and Engineering 181 (1):1–16. doi:10.13182/NSE14-88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, C., Z. Liu, L. Liang, J. Chen, L. Cao, and H. Wu. 2018. Leakage reconstruction method for 2D/1D fusion transport calculations. Progress in Nuclear Energy 105:202–10. doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar