749
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Victimhood and trauma within drone warfare

Pages 175-190 | Received 25 Oct 2020, Accepted 06 Jul 2021, Published online: 29 Jul 2021

References

  • AFP (Agence France-Presse). (2013) “Depression, Anxiety and War Take Toll in Pakistan’s Tribal Belt | The Express Tribune.” [online]. Accessed 31 December 2019. https://tribune.com.pk/story/532330/depression-anxiety-and-war-take-toll-in-pakistans-tribal-belt/
  • Agius, C. 2017. “Ordering without Bordering: Drones, the Unbordering of Late Modern Warfare and Ontological Insecurity.” Postcolonial Studies 20: 370–386. doi:10.1080/13688790.2017.1378084.
  • Alker, Z., and B. Godfrey. 2016. “Soldiers and Victims: Conceptions of Military Service and Victimhood.” In McGarry R., Walklate S. (eds),The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and War, 138–148. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Asaro, P. 2013. “The Labor of Surveillance and Bureaucratized Killing: New Subjectivities of Military Drone Operators.” Social Semiotics 23: 196–224. doi:10.1080/10350330.2013.777591.
  • Barrett, F. J. 1996. “The Organizational Construction of Hegemonic Masculinity: The Case of the US Navy.” Gender, Work, and Organization 3 (3): 129–142. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.1996.tb00054.x.
  • Basham, V. M. 2016. “Gender and Militaries: The Importance of Military Masculinities for the Conduct of State Sanctioned Violence.” in Sharoni S., Welland J., Steiner L., Pederson J. (eds) In Handbook on Gender and War, 29-46. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Beard, J. M. 2009. “Law and War in the Virtual Era.” American Journal of International Law 103: 409–445. doi:10.1017/S0002930000019928.
  • Bergen, P. L., and D. Rothenberg. 2014. Drone Wars: Transforming Conflict, Law, and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bousquet, A. 2017. “Lethal Visions: The Eye as Function of the Weapon.” Critical Studies on Security 5 (1): 62–80. doi:10.1080/21624887.2017.1329471.
  • Bryant, B. 2017. “Letter from a Censor Operator.” in Parks L., Kaplan C. (eds) In Life in the Age of Drone Warfare, 315–323. London: Duke University Press.
  • Byman, D. 2013. “Why Drones Work: The Case for Washington’s Weapon of Choice.” Foreign Affairs 92: 32.
  • Chamayou, G. 2015. Drone Theory. New York, NY: New Press.
  • Chamberlin, S. M. E. 2012. “Emasculated by Trauma: A Social History of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, Stigma, and Masculinity.” The Journal of American Culture 35: 360–364.
  • Chappelle, W., A. Salinas, and K. McDonald. 2011. Psychological Health Screening of Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) Operators and Supporting Units. Ohio: School of Aerospace Medicine Wright Patterson AFB OH Aerospace Medicine Dept.
  • Chappelle, W., K. McDonald, B. Thompson, and J. Swearengen 2012. Prevalence of High Emotional Distress and Symptoms of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder in US Air Force Active Duty Remotely Piloted Aircraft Operators (2010 USAFSAM Survey Results). Ohio: School of Aerospace Medicine Wright Patterson AFB OH Aerospace Medicine Dept.
  • Chappelle, W. L., K. D. McDonald, L. Prince, T. Goodman, B. N. Ray-Sannerud, W. Thompson,W. 2014. “Symptoms of Psychological Distress and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder in United States Air Force “Drone” Operators”. Military Medicine 179: 63–70. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00501.
  • Chow, R. 2006. “The Age of the World Target: Atomic Bombs, Alterity, Area Studies.” in Grewal I, Kaplan C. Wiegman R. (eds) In The Age of the World Target: Self-referentiality in War, Theory and Comparative Work, 25–43. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Cogan, A. M., C. E. Haines, and M. D. Devore. 2019. “Intersections of US Military Culture, Hegemonic Masculinity, and Health Care among Injured Male Service Members.” Men and Masculinities 24: 1097184X19872793.
  • Cohen, A., and Y. Shany. 2007. “A Development of Modest Proportions: The Application of the Principle of Proportionality in the Targeted Killings Case.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5: 310–321. doi:10.1093/jicj/mqm016.
  • Cohn, C., and C. Enloe. 2003. “A Conversation with Cynthia Enloe: Feminists Look at Masculinity and the Men Who Wage War.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (4): 1107–1187. doi:10.1086/368326.
  • Connell, R. W. 2017. “Masculinities, the Reduction of Violence and the Pursuit of Peace.” in Jamieson R. (eds) In The Criminology of War, 479–487. Routledge.
  • Connell, R. W., and J. W. Messerschmidt. 2005. “Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept.” Gender & Society 19 (6): 829–859. doi:10.1177/0891243205278639.
  • Cullen, T. M. (2011). “The MQ-9 Reaper Remotely Piloted Aircraft: Humans and Machines in Action.” Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Daggett, C. 2015. “Drone Disorientations: How “Unmanned” Weapons Queer the Experience of Killing in War.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 17 (3): 361–379. doi:10.1080/14616742.2015.1075317.
  • de Volo, L. B. 2016. “Unmanned? Gender Recalibrations and the Rise of Drone Warfare.” Politics & Gender 12: 50–77. doi:10.1017/S1743923X15000252.
  • Duncanson, C. 2015. “Hegemonic Masculinity and the Possibility of Change in Gender Relations.” Men and Masculinities 18 (2): 231–248. doi:10.1177/1097184X15584912.
  • Edney-Browne, A. 2017. “Embodiment and Affect in a Digital Age: Understanding Mental Illness among Military Drone Personnel.” Krisis 1: 19–32.
  • Emslie, C., D. Ridge, S. Ziebland, and K. Hunt. 2006. “Men’s Accounts of Depression: Reconstructing or Resisting Hegemonic Masculinity?” Social Science & Medicine 62 (9): 2246–2257. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.017.
  • Enemark, C. 2017. “Drones, Risk, and Moral Injury.” Critical Military Studies 5: 150–167. doi:10.1080/23337486.2017.1384979.
  • Enloe, C. 2000. Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women’s Lives. California: Univ of California Press.
  • Enloe, C. 2007.
  • Enloe, C. 2015. “The Recruiter and the Sceptic: A Critical Feminist Approach to Military Studies.” Critical Military Studies 1 (1): 3–10. doi:10.1080/23337486.2014.961746.
  • Estreicher, S. 2011. “Privileging Asymmetric Warfare (Part II): The Proportionality Principle under International Humanitarian Law.” Chicago Journal of International Law 12: 143–157.
  • Fassin, D., and R. Rechtman. 2009. “The Empire of Trauma: An Inquiry into the Condition of Victimhood.” Sociology of Health & Illness 32: 670–672.
  • Forbes, D., D. Pedlar, A. B. Adler, C. Bennett, R. Bryant, W. Busuttil, J. Cooper, et al. 2019. “Treatment of Military-related Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: Challenges, Innovations, and the Way Forward”. International Review of Psychiatry 31: 95–110. doi:10.1080/09540261.2019.1595545.
  • Green, G., C. Emslie, D. O’Neill, K. Hunt, and S. Walker. 2010. “Exploring the Ambiguities of Masculinity in Accounts of Emotional Distress in the Military among Young Ex-servicemen.” Social Science & Medicine 71 (8): 1480–1488. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.07.015.
  • Gregory, D. 2011. “From a View to a Kill: Drones and Late Modern War.” Theory, Culture & Society 28: 188–215. doi:10.1177/0263276411423027.
  • Grossman, D. 1995. On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society. New York: Back Bay Books.
  • Harris, C. 2006. “The Omniscient Eye: Satellite Imagery,” Battlespace Awareness,” and the Structures of the Imperial Gaze.” Surveillance & Society 4: 101–122.
  • Henry, M. 2017. “Problematizing Military Masculinity, Intersectionality and Male Vulnerability in Feminist Critical Military Studies.” Critical Military Studies 3 (2): 182–199. doi:10.1080/23337486.2017.1325140.
  • Higate, P., and J. Hopton. 2004. “War, Militarism.” in Kimmel SM. Hearn J. Connell RW. (eds) In Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities, 432–447. London: Sage.
  • Hijazi, A., C. J. Ferguson, F. R. Ferraro, H. Hall, M. Hovee, and S. Wilcox. 2019. “Psychological Dimensions of Drone Warfare”. Current Psychology 38: 1285–1296. doi:10.1007/s12144-017-9684-7.
  • Holmes, R. 2006. Dusty Warriors: Modern Soldiers at War. New York: HarperPress.
  • Holmqvist, C. 2013. “Undoing War: War Ontologies and the Materiality of Drone Warfare.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41: 535–552. doi:10.1177/0305829813483350.
  • Jinkerson, J. D. 2016. “Defining and Assessing Moral Injury: A Syndrome Perspective.” Traumatology 22 (2): 122. doi:10.1037/trm0000069.
  • Kauzlarich, D., R. A. Matthews, and W. J. Miller. 2001. “Toward a Victimology of State Crime.” Critical Criminology 10: 173–194. doi:10.1023/A:1015744304749.
  • Linebaugh, H. (2013). “I Worked on the US Drone Program. The Public Should Know What Really Goes on | Heather Linebaugh.” [online] Accessed 11 December 2019 https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/29/drones-us-military
  • Litz, B. T., N. Stein, E. Delaney, L. Lebowitz, W. P. Nash, C. Silva, S. Maguen, et al. 2009. “Moral Injury and Moral Repair in War Veterans: A Preliminary Model and Intervention Strategy”. Clinical Psychology Review 29: 695–706. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.07.003.
  • Manjikian, M. 2014. “Becoming Unmanned: The Gendering of Lethal Autonomous Warfare Technology.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 16: 48–65. doi:10.1080/14616742.2012.746429.
  • McGarry, R., and S. Walklate. 2011. “The Soldier as Victim: Peering through the Looking Glass.” The British Journal of Criminology 51: 900–917. doi:10.1093/bjc/azr057.
  • Nicholas, L., and C. Agius. 2017. The Persistence of Global Masculinism: Discourse, Gender and Neo-colonial Re-articulations of Violence.
  • Pilkington, E. (2015) “Life as a Drone Operator: ‘Ever Step on Ants and Never Give It Another Thought?’.” [online]. Accessed 3 January 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/18/life-as-a-drone-pilot-creech-air-force-base-nevada
  • Prestwich, P. E. 2003. “‘“victims of War”? Mentally-Traumatized Soldiers and the State, 1918–1939.” The Western Society for French History 31: 243–254.
  • Pugliese, J. 2013. State Violence and the Execution of the Law: Biopolitical Caesurae of Torture, Black Sites, Drones. New York: Routledge.
  • Rischardson, L. K., B. C. Frueh, and R. Acierno. 2010. “Prevalence Estimates of Combat-related PTSD: A Critical Review.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 44: 4–19. doi:10.3109/00048670903393597.
  • Ruggiero, V. 2005. “Criminalizing War: Criminology as Ceasefire.” Social & Legal Studies 14: 239–257. doi:10.1177/0964663905051221.
  • Sauer, F., and N. Schörnig. 2012. “Killer Drones: The ‘Silver Bullet’of Democratic Warfare?” Security Dialogue 43 (4): 363–380. doi:10.1177/0967010612450207.
  • Smethurst, T., and S. Craps. 2019. “Towards an Understanding of Drone Fiction.” Journal of War & Culture Studies 12 (1): 85–102. doi:10.1080/17526272.2018.1514759.
  • Sparrow, R. 2015. “Drones, Courage, and Military Culture.” in Lucas G. (eds) In Routledge Handbook of Military Ethics, 380–394.
  • Strawser, B. J. 2010. “Moral Predators: The Duty to Employ Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles.” Journal of Military Ethics 9: 342–368. doi:10.1080/15027570.2010.536403.
  • Van Gilder, B. J. 2019. “Femininity as Perceived Threat to Military Effectiveness: How Military Service Members Reinforce Hegemonic Masculinity in Talk.” Western Journal of Communication 83 (2): 151–171. doi:10.1080/10570314.2018.1502892.
  • Vogel, R. J. 2010. “Drone Warfare and the Law of Armed Conflict.” Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 39: 101.
  • Wibben, A. T. 2018. “Why We Need to Study (US) Militarism: A Critical Feminist Lens.” Security Dialogue 49 (1–2): 136–148. doi:10.1177/0967010617742006.
  • Wilcox, L. 2017. “Embodying Algorithmic War: Gender, Race, and the Posthuman in Drone Warfare.” Security Dialogue 48: 11–28. doi:10.1177/0967010616657947.
  • Williams, A. J. 2011. “Enabling Persistent Presence? Performing the Embodied Geopolitics of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Assemblage.” Political Geography 30: 381–390. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.08.002.
  • Yan, G. W. 2016. “The Invisible Wound: Moral Injury and Its Impact on the Health of Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom Veterans.” Military Medicine 181 (5): 451–458. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00103.
  • Zehfuss, M. 2011. “Targeting: Precision and the Production of Ethics.” European Journal of International Relations 17 (3): 543–566. doi:10.1177/1354066110373559.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.