‘Man(ne)’s world’: explaining the paradoxical nature of attitudes towards women in combat

References

• Aragones, A. F. 2020. “Women, Body and War: Kurdish Female Fighters through Commander Arian and Girls’ War.” Media, War and Conflict. doi:10.1177/1750635220948554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ase, C. 2019. “Introduction: Gender, War, and Military Sacrifice.” In Gendering Military Sacrifice: A Feminist Comparative Analysis, edited by C. Ase and M. Wendt, 1–17. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Basham, V. 2018. “Liberal Militarism as Insecurity, Desire and Ambivalence: Gender, Race and the Everyday Geopolitics of War.” Security Dialogue 49 (1–2): 32–43. doi:10.1177/0967010617744977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belkin, A. 2012. Bring Me Men: Military Masculinity and the Benign Façade of American Empire 1898–2001. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, J. 2020. “Closing Address.” Gender Inclusive Army Conference. November. Accessed 2 August 2021. https://kea-learning.nz/building-a-gender-inclusive-army/agenda/closing-address/
   Google Scholar
• Brewster, M. 2021. “Ghosts of Scandals past Stalk Canadian Military as Sexual Misconduct Fallout Grows.” CBC Website. March 10. Accessed 3 August 2021. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/military-misconduct-somalia-1.5943425
   Google Scholar
• Britzky, H. 2021. “These are the Least Safe Army Posts for Female Soldiers.” Task and Purpose. June 21. https://taskandpurpose.com/news/army-posts-sexual-assault-harassment-risk/
   Google Scholar
• Burk, J. 1995. “Military Service and Citizenship Status: The Quest for Inclusion by Minorities and Conscientious Objectors.” Armed Forces and Society. 21(4 (Summer)): 503–529.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carreiras, H. 2008. “From Loyalty to Dissent: How Military Women Respond to Integration Dilemmas.” In Women in the Military and in Armed Conflict, edited by H. Carreiras, and G. Kummel, 161–181, Weisbaden: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, L. 2021. “Delivering Life, Delivering Death: Reaper Drones, Hysteria and Maternity.” Security Dialogue. First Published April 27. doi: 10.1177/0967010621997628
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, C., and M. Hubic. 2002. “Gender and the Peacekeeping Military: A View from Bosnian Women’s Organizations.” In The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities and International Peacekeeping, edited by C. Cockburn and D. Zarkov, 117–118. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., C. Huff, and R. Schub. 2020. “At War and at Home: The Consequences of US Women Combat Casualties.” Journal of Conflict Resolution. doi:10.1177/0022002720964952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, C., and C. Enloe. 2003. “A Conversation with Cynthia Enloe: Feminists Look at Masculinity and the Men Who Wage War.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (4): 1107–1187. doi:10.1086/368326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, C. 2018. “The Perils of Mixing Masculinity and Missiles.” New York Times. January 5. Accessed 12 June 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/05/opinion/security-masculinity-nuclear-weapons.html
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, Carol 2000 “How Can She Claim Equal Rights When She Doesn't Have to Do as Many Push-Ups as I Do?”: The Framing of Men's Opposition to Women's Equality in the Military Men and Masculinities 3 2 131–51 https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X00003002001
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R., and J. Messerschmidt. 2005. “Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept.” Gender and Society 19 (6): 829–859. doi:10.1177/0891243205278639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhamapuri, S. 2011. “Just Add Women and Stir?” Parameters 41(Spring): 56–70. https://press.armywarcollege.edu/parameters/vol41/iss1/4/.
   Google Scholar
• Dover, S. 2013. “Marines Study Shows Resistance to Women in Combat.” CBS News. February 1. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/marines-study-shows-resistance-to-women-in-combat/
   Google Scholar
• Duncanson, C., and R. Woodward. 2016. “Regendering the Military: Theorising Women’s Participation.” Security Dialogue 47 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1177/0967010615614137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncanson, C. 2009. “Forces for Good? Narratives of Military Masculinity in Peacekeeping Operations.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 11 (1): 63–80. doi:10.1080/14616740802567808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsthain, J. B. 1987. Women and War. Brighton: Harvestor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 1988. Does Khaki Become You? the Militarisation of Women’s Lives, 2nd Ed. London: Pandora.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 1994. “The Politics of Constructing the American Woman Soldier.” In Women Soldiers: Images and Realities, edited by E. Addis, Russo, V., and Sebesta, L., 81–110. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 1991. “Women and children: Propaganda Tools of Patriarchy” In Mobilizing Democracy: Changing the US Role in the Middle East, Edited by G. Bates. 29– 32. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 1998. “Women and the Evolution of World Politics.” Foreign Affairs 77 (5): 24–40. doi:10.2307/20049048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner, S. 2008. “Secondary Casualty Information: Casualty Uncertainty, Female Casualties and Wartime Support.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 25 (2): 98–111. doi:10.1080/07388940802007215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, N. 2014. “Promoting Women, Peace and Security in the Pacific Islands: Hot Conflict/slow Violence.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 68 (3): 314–332. doi:10.1080/10357718.2014.902032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1977. “The Arrangement between the Sexes.” Theory and Society 4 (3): 301–331. doi:10.1007/BF00206983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, H. 2017. “Domestic Abuse and the Reproduction of the Idealised Wife.” In The Palgrave International Handbook on Gender and the Military, edited by R. Woodward and C. Duncanson, 227–240. Houndsmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Harel-Shalev, A., and S. Daphna-Tekoah. 2020. Breaking the Binaries in Security Studies: A Gendered Analysis of Women in Combat. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harel-Shalev, A. 2021. ““A Room of One’s Own(?)” in Battlespace – Women Soldiers in War Rooms.” Critical Military Studies 7 (1): 42–60. doi:10.1080/23337486.2018.1494882.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, M. 1998. Camouflage Isn’t Only for Combat: Gender, Sexuality and Women in the Military. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, C. 2001. Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations and Gender Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Indian Express. 2020. “Editorial.” February 11. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/editorials/supreme-court-women-army-6261290/
   Google Scholar
• IRC (Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault in the Military). 2021. “Hard Truths and the Duty to Change: Recommendations from the Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault in the Military.” Accessed 2 August 2021. https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jul/02/2002755437/-1/-1/0/IRC-FULL-REPORT-FINAL-1923-7-1-21.PDF/IRC-FULL-REPORT-FINAL-1923-7-1-21.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Iverson, K. 2020. “COVID-19 Gender Equality Women Deliver.” World Economic Forum. May 22. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/05/covid19-gender-equality-women-deliver/
   Google Scholar
• Kantola, J. 2005. Feminists Theorize the State. Houndsmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kaschak, E. 1992. Engendered Lives: A New Psychology of Women’s Experience. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. 2016. “The Female Combat Soldier.” European Journal of International Relations 22 (1): 122–143. doi:10.1177/1354066115581909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, R. R. 2006. Fighting for Rights: Military Service and the Politics of Citizenship. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kronsell, A., and E. Svedberg. 2012. “Introduction: Making Gender, Making War.” In Making Gender, Making War: Violence, Military and Peacekeeping Practices, edited by A. Kronsell and E. Svedberg, 1–19. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kronsell, A. 2005. “Gendered Practices in Institutions of Hegemonic Masculinity: Reflections from Feminist Standpoint Theory.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (2): 280–298. doi:10.1080/14616740500065170.
   Google Scholar
• Leask, A. 2019. “Hands Off: Police Making Five Strangulation Arrests a Day, Victim Relives ‘Terrifying’ Ordeal.” New Zealand Herald Online. February 28. Accessed 10 August 2019. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12207929
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, C. 2001. Homefront: A Military City and the American Twentieth Century. Boston MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, M. 2015. Beyond the Band of Brothers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, M. 2020. “Why Do Soldiers Swap Illicit Pictures? How a Visual Discourse Analysis Illuminates Military Band of Brother Culture.” Security Dialogue 51 (4): 340–357. doi:10.1177/0967010619898468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C. 1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of State. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manne, K. 2018. Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mikkola, M. 2019 The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2019). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/feminism-gender
   Google Scholar
• Moskos, C. 1982. “Social Considerations of the All-Volunteer Force” In Military Service in the United States, Edited by American Assembly, Columbia University, 129–150. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, J. 2018. “Former Army Officer Turned MP Andrew Hastie Says Women Should Not Serve in Combat Roles.” ABC News. February 7. abc.net.au/news/2018-02-06/andrew-hastie-says-women-should-not-serve-in-combat-roles/9402752
   Google Scholar
• NZHerald. 2012. “Fight over Women in Combat.” February 22. Accessed 22 May 2020. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/fight-over-women-in-combat/RLKSVEEQ6SYVT27XT46UCNUQ3U/
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pendlebury, J. 2021. ““Don’t Be Such a Girl”: Enduring Masculine Norms in an Age of Military Diversity.” Webinar Presentation to UN Department of Peace Operations. June 24.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, V. S. 1992. “Introduction.” In Gendered States: Feminist (Re) Visions of International Relations Theory edited by Peterson, V. Spike, 1–30. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, V. S. 1992. “Security and Sovereign States: What Is at Stake in Taking Feminism Seriously.” In Gendered States: Feminist (Re)visions of International Relations Theory, edited by V. S. Peterson, 31–64. New York: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2013. “Broad Support for Combat Roles for Women: Most Say Policy Will Not Harm Combat Effectiveness.” January 29. Accessed 22 September 2020. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2013/01/29/broad-support-for-combat-roles-for-women/
   Google Scholar
• PRIO Center on Gender Peace and Security/Georgetown Institute for Women Peace and Security (GIWPS). 2019. University, Women, Peace and Security Index 2019/2020. Washington DC: Georgetown University. 16. accessed 10 December 2019. https://giwps.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/WPS-Index-2019-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C. 2020. “COVID-19s Impact on Gender Equality.” UAB Institute for Human Rights https://sites.uab.edu/humanrights/2020/10/28/covid-19s-impact-on-gender-equality/
   Google Scholar
• Runyon, A., and V. S. Peterson. 1991. Global Gender Issues in the New Millennium. Boulder CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sasson-Levy, O. 2003. “Feminism and military gender practices: Israeli women soldiers in “masculine” roles.” Sociological Inquiry 73 (3): 440–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, M. 2010. “Combating a Different Enemy: Proposals to Change the Culture of Sexual Assault in the Military.” Villianova Law Review 55 (2): 475–508.
   Google Scholar
• Schogol, J. 2018. “Mattis Can’t Say if Having Women in the Infantry Will Work or Not.” Task and Purpose. September 25. https://taskandpurpose.com/bulletpoints/mattis-female-infantry-combat/
   Google Scholar
• Silva, J. M. 2008. “A New Generation of Women? How Female ROTC Cadets Negotiate the Tension between Masculine Military Culture and Traditional Femininity.” Social Forces 87 (2): 937–960. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiehm, J. H. 1982. “The Protected, the Protector, the Defender.” Women’s Studies International Forum 5 (3–4): 367–376. doi:10.1016/0277-5395(82)90048-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, J. 2016. “Changing the identities of young army recruits and new ways of looking at hegemonic forms of military masculinity.” Culture, Societies and Masculinities 8 (1): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Szitanyi, S. 2020. Gender Trouble in the US Military: Challenges to Regimes of Male Privilege. Houndsmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Tamar, S., M. Reifen-Tagar, and J. Daphna. 2021. “The Gender-binary Cycle: The Perpetual Relations between a Biological-essentialist View of Gender, Gender Ideology, and Gender-labelling and Sorting.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society; Biological Sciences B3762020014. February 22. doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tickner, J. 1992. Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Towns, A. 2009. “The Status of Women as a Standard of ‘Civilisation’.” European Journal of International Relations 15 (4): 681–706. doi:10.1177/1354066109345053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• True, J. 2018. “Bringing Back Gendered States: Feminist Second Image Theorizing of International Relations.” In Revisiting Gendered States: Feminist Imaginings of the State in International Relations, edited by S. Parashar, J. A. Ticker, and J. True, 33–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UN Women. 2020a. “Covid-19 Emerging Gender Data and Why It Matters.” June 26. https://data.unwomen.org/resources/covid-19-emerging-gender-data-and-why-it-matters
   Google Scholar
• UN Women. 2020. “Welcome to Equiterra, Where Gender Equality Is Real.” UN Women Website. March 3. Accessed 21 September 2020. https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/multimedia/2020/2/illustration-equiterra-gender-equality-utopia
   Google Scholar
• Van Creveld, M. 2000. “The Great Illusion: Women in the Military.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29 (2): 429–442. doi:10.1177/03058298000290021101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gilder, B. J. 2018. “Femininity as Perceived Threat to Military Effectiveness: How Military Service Members Reinforce Hegemonic Masculinity in Talk.” Western Journal of Communication 1–21. doi:10.1080/10570314.2018.1502892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadham, B. 2017. “Violence in the Military and Relations among Men: Military Masculinities and ‘Rape Prone Cultures’.” In The Palgrave International Handbook on Gender and the Military, edited by R. Woodward and C. Duncanson, 241–256. Houndsmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Wadley, J. 2010. “Gendering the state: performativity and protection in international security.” In: Gender and International Security: Feminist Perspectives, edited by Sjoberg, Laura, 38–58. Routledge Critical Security Studies series. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, L. 2018. “Domestic Violence Victims Able to Take New Form of Leave.” Stuff. July 25. Accessed 28 July 2018. https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/105735404/domestic-violence-victims-able-to-take-a-new-form-of-leave
   Google Scholar
• Wilen, Nina, and Heinecken, Lindy 2018 Regendering the South African army: Inclusion, reversal and displacement Gender, Work and Organization 25 670–686 https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. 2021. “Tackling Gender Bias.” Grounded Curiosity. July 29. https://groundedcuriosity.com/tackling-gender-bias/#.YQc_Ro4zZPa
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R., and C. Duncanson. 2017. “An Introduction to Gender and the Military.” In The Palgrave International Handbook on Gender and the Military, edited by R. Woodward and C. Duncanson, 1–20. Houndsmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 2003. “The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 29 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1086/375708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaleski, K. 2019. “Revenge Porn in the US Military.” Sound Off Blog. August 26. Accessed 19 September 2020. https://centerforlaw.org/sound-off/f/lets-start-talking-about-revenge-porn-in-the-us-military
   Google Scholar