Making gifts from contracts: symbolic resources and resanctification in officers’ language

References

• Abbott, A. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, S. F., and A. Bakker. 2011. “Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects.” Review of Educational Research 81 (2): 132–169. doi:10.3102/0034654311404435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, B. 2013. “Soldiering as Work: The All-Volunteer Force in the United States.” In Fighting for A Living: A Comparative Study of Military Labour 1500-2000, edited by E.-J. Zürcher, 581–612. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt6wp6pg.22
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2015. “What Is Policy? 21 Years Later: Reflections on the Possibilities of Policy Research.” Discourse 36 (3): 306–313. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1015279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basham, V. M., A. Belkin, and J. Gifkins. 2015. “What Is Critical Military Studies?” Critical Military Studies 1 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1080/23337486.2015.1006879.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L. 1963. Invitation to Sociology. New York: First Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., and T. Luckmann. 1991. The Social Construction Of Reality: A Treatise In The Sociology Of Knowledge. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, M. 2010. All that Is Solid Melts into Air. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenberg, H. 1985. The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., and S. Leigh Star. 2000. Sorthing Things Out: Classificaton and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., S. Timmermans, A. E. Clarke, and E. Balka, eds. 2015. Boundary Objects and Beyond: Working with Leigh Star. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, S., and M. Eichler. 2017. “Unmaking Militarized Masculinity: Veterans and the Project of Military-to-Civilian Transition.” Critical Military Studies 3 (2): 161–181. doi:10.1080/23337486.2017.1320055.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, E. 2018. An Army of Tribes: British Army Cohesion, Deviancy and Murder in Northern Ireland. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bury, P. 2017. “Barossa Night: Cohesion in the British Army Officer Corps.” The British Journal of Sociology 68 (2): 314–335. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterfield, H. 1973. The Whig Interpretation of History. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Caforio, G. 2006. “Military Officer Education.” In Handbook of the Sociology of the Military, edited by G. Caforio, 255–278. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Caillé, A. 2018. “Qu’est-Ce Qui Ne va Pas Avec Le Don Chez Bourdieu ? Le Don n’est Pas Un Acte Économique Mais Un Opérateur Politique.” Revue Du Mauss 2 (52): 74–88. doi:10.3917/rdm.052.0074.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, J. G. 1995. Gifts & Commodities: Exchange and Western Capitalism since 1700. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clonan, T. 2007. “Civil Control Of The Military And Police In Ireland: The Armed Forces.” In TASC Audit Ireland, 2007: Power to the People? Assessing Democracy in Ireland. Dublin: TASC. https://arrow.tudublin.ie/aaschmedbk/12/.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, L., N. Caddick, L. Godier, A. Cooper, and M. Fossey. 2018. “Transition from the Military into Civilian Life: An Exploration of Cultural Competence.” Armed Forces and Society 44 (1): 156–177. doi:10.1177/0095327X16675965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dáil Éireann Debates. 2022. ““Defence Forces Strength”. Parliamentary Questions (Written Answers), Feb. 2. Vol. 1017, No. 3.”
   Google Scholar
• Day, R. J. F. 2005. Gramsci Is Dead: Anarchist Currents in the Newest Social Movements. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douven, I. 2017. “Abduction.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/abduction
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1cgf6tc.14.
   Google Scholar
• Feld, M. D. 1977. The Structure of Violence: Armed Forces as Social Systems. Beverly Hills and London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, V. 1999. Preparing for Peace. Military Identity, Value Orientations, and Professional Military Education. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Frisk, K. 2019. “Armadillo and the Viking Spirit: Military Names and National Myths in Transnational Military Interventions.” Critical Military Studies 5 (1): 21–39. doi:10.1080/23337486.2017.1319644.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, B. P. 2016. “Burdens of Proof: Veteran Frauds, Ptsd Pussies, and the Spectre of the Welfare Queen.” Critical Military Studies 2 (3): 139–154. doi:10.1080/23337486.2016.1155861.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, C. 2022. “New Report to Recommend Overhaul of Defence Forces Command Structure.” The Irish Times. 7 February.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, A. G. 2020. Socialisation, Role Theory, and Infrapolitics: Officers of the Irish Defence Forces and Civilian Higher Education since the 1960s. Dublin: Trinity College Dublin. http://www.tara.tcd.ie/handle/2262/94041
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, A. G. 2021. “Infrapolitics and Role Abeyance: How Irish Military Officers Experience University.” Irish Journal of Sociology 29 (2): 160–186. doi:10.1177/07916035211005437.
   Google Scholar
• Godelier, M. 1999. The Enigma of the Gift. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1968. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. London: Pelican.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1990. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Goldkuhl, G., and S. Cronholm. 2010. “Adding Theoretical Grounding to Grounded Theory: Toward Multi-Grounded Theory.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 9 (2): 187–205. doi:10.1177/160940691000900205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagstrom, W. O. 1965. The Scientific Community. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, H. C. 2008. “The Development of British Military Masculinities through Symbolic Resources.” Culture and Psychology 14 (3): 305–332. doi:10.1177/1354067X08092636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, K. 2006. Last Best Gifts: Altruism and the Market for Human Blood and Organs. University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, A. 1999. A Theory of Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, K. 2008. “Reflections on the Culture of Veterans.” Workplace Health and Safety 56 (8): 337–341. doi:10.3928/08910162-20080801-07.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hockey, J. 1986. Squaddies: Portrait of a Subculture. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. 1957. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janowitz, M. 2017. The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. 2000. “Disenchantment, Enchantment and Re-Enchantment: Max Weber at the Millennium.” Max Weber Studies 1 (1): 11–32.
   Google Scholar
• Jesse, N. G. 2006. “Choosing to Go It Alone: Irish Neutrality in Theoretical and Comparative Perspective.” International Political Science Review 27 (1): 7–28. doi:10.1177/0192512106058624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. 2006. “The Word of Command: Communication and Cohesion in the Military.” Armed Forces and Society 32 (4): 493–512. doi:10.1177/0095327X05283041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. 2007. “The Existence of Group Cohesion in the Armed Forces: A Response to Guy Siebold.” Armed Forces and Society 33 (4): 638–645. doi:10.1177/0095327X07301445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. 2009. “Unity Is Strength: Staff College and the British Officer Corps.” The British Journal of Sociology 60 (1): 123–144. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.01221.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. 2014. The Combat Soldier: Infantry Tactics and Cohesion in the Twentieth and Twenty‐First Centuries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, J. P. 1979. Neither Athens nor Sparta? The American Service Academies in Transition. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, C. 2019. “Bureaucratic Weaponry and the Production of Ignorance in Military Operations on Guam.” Current Anthropology 60 (S19): S108–21. doi:10.1086/699937.
   Google Scholar
• Maine, H. S. 1908. Ancient Law. 10th ed. London: John Murray. https://archive.org/details/ancientlaw030840mbp/
   Google Scholar
• Markides, K. C., and S. F. Cohn. 1982. “External Conflict/Internal Cohesion: A Reevaluation of an Old Theory.” American Sociological Review 47 (1): 88–98. doi:10.2307/2095044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. 2016. Breaking Ranks: The Shaping of Civil-Military Relations in Ireland. Dublin: History Press Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. 2010. The Manifesto of the Communist Party. Marxists Internet Archive. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Masland, J. W., and L. I. Radway. 1957. Soldiers and Scholars: Military Education and National Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. 1990. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miewald, R. D. 1970. “Weberian Bureaucracy and the Military Model.” Public Administration Review 30 (2): 129–133. doi:10.2307/973227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Military Archives of Ireland (MAI). 1969. ““University Training for cadets/officers”, 27 Aug. TRG-016.”
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. 1997. The Racial Contract. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moskos, C. C. 1970. The American Enlisted Man: The Rank and File in Today’s Military. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Moskos, C. C. 1977a. “From Institution to Occupation: Trends in Military Organization.” Armed Forces & Society 4 (1): 41–50. doi:10.1177/0095327X7700400103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskos, C. C. 1977b. “The All-Volunteer Military: Calling, Profession, or Occupation?” Parameters 7 (1): 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Moskos, C. C. 1986. “Institutional/Occupational Trends in Armed Forces: An Update.” Armed Forces & Society 12 (3): 377–382. doi:10.1177/0095327X8601200303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Halpin, E. 1999. Defending Ireland: The Irish State and Its Enemies since 1922. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, P. K. J. 2013. Africa, Asia, and the History of Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlins, M. 2017. Stone Age Economics. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schuilenburg, M., and R. Peeters. 2017. “Gift Politics: Exposure and Surveillance in the Anthropocene.” Crime, Law and Social Change 68 (5): 563–578. doi:10.1007/s10611-017-9703-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shils, E. A., and M. Janowitz. 1948. “Cohesion and Disintegration in the Wehrmacht in World War II.” Public Opinion Quarterly 12 (2): 280–315. doi:10.1086/265951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleeboom-Faulkner, M. 2014. “The Twenty-First-Century Gift and the Co-Circulation of Things.” Anthropological Forum 24 (4): 323–337. doi:10.1080/00664677.2014.948380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smelser, N. J. 1959. “A Comparative View of Exchange Systems.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 7 (2): 173–182. doi:10.1086/449790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 2010. “This Is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology & Human Values 35 (5): 601–617. doi:10.1177/0162243910377624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supiot, A. 2017. Homo Juridicus: On the Anthropological Function of the Law. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., and I. Tavory. 2012. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis.” Sociological Theory 30 (3): 167–186. doi:10.1177/0735275112457914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titmuss, R. M. 1970. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Wark, M. 2017. General Intellects. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 2007. Weber: Selections in Translation (W. G. Runciman (ed.)).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.2307/3339830.
   Google Scholar