The Irish defence forces and the silencing of a feminist researcher

References

• Ackerly, B., E. Jay Friedman, K. Menon, and M. Zalewski. 2020. “Research Ethics and Epistemic Oppression.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 22 (3): 309–311. doi:10.1080/14616742.2020.1771006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerly, B., and J. True. 2008. “Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations.” International Studies Review 10 (4): 693–707. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00826.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åhäll, L. 2018. Affect as Methodology: Feminism and the Politics of Emotion. International Political Sociology 12(1): 36–52. doi:10.1093/ips/olx024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2017. Living a Feminist Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2021. Complaint!. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C., V. Basham, S. Bulmer, H. Gray, and A. Hyde. 2016. “Encounters with the Military.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 18 (1): 140–154. doi:10.1080/14616742.2015.1106102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basham, V. M. 2013. War, Identity and the Liberal State: Everyday Experiences of the Geopolitical in the Armed Forces. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Catignani, S., and V. M. Basham. 2021. “The Gendered Politics of Researching Military Policy in the Age of the ‘Knowledge Economy.’.” Review of International Studies 47 (2): 211–230. doi:10.1017/S0260210521000036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clonan, T. M. 2000. The Status and Roles Assigned Female Personnel in the Irish Defence Forces. PhD Thesis. Ireland: Dublin City University.
   Google Scholar
• Clonan, T. 2019. “Surviving Whistleblowing in the Military – a Personal, Professional and Ethical Journey”, EURO ISME (International Society for Military Ethics in Europe) Occasional Paper No. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, C. 1987. “Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 12 (4): 687–718. doi:10.1086/494362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defence Forces. 2008. Annual Report online at: http://www.military.ie/fileadmin/user_upload/images/Info_Centre/documents/Annual_Reports/ar_2008_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. 2019. Ireland’s National Action Plan for Implementation of UNSCR 1325 Ireland Third NAP https://www.irishaid.ie/media/irishaid/allwebsitemedia/20newsandpublications/publicationpdfsenglish/irelands-national-actionplan-for-implementation-of-unscr-1325.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, E. 2004. The Challenge of a Workplace. Dublin: Department of Defence.
   Google Scholar
• Eduards, M. 2012. “What Does a Bath Towel Have to Do with Security Policy? Gender Trouble in the Swedish Armed Forces.” In Making Gender, Making War: Violence, Military and Peacekeeping Practices, edited by A. Kronsell and E. Svedberg, 11. New York & London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 2000. Maneuvres: The International Politics of Militarizing Women’s Lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 2004. The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in a New Age of Empire. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 2017. The Big Push: Exposing and Challenging the Persistence of Patriarchy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, H. 2016. “Researching from the Spaces in Between? The Politics of Accountability in Studying the British Military in Studying the British Military.” Critical Military Studies 2 (1–2): 70–83. doi:10.1080/23337486.2016.1127554.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, L. 2018. ”Reconstructing the Silence/Speech Dichotomy in Feminist Security Studies Gender, Agency and the Politics of Subjectivity in La Frontière Invisible.” In Rethinking Silence, Voice and Agency in Contested Gendered Terrains, edited by J. L. Parpart and S. Parashar, 27. UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 1995. “Just Add Women and Stir” in Missing Links: Gender Equity in Science and Technology for Development. Gender Working Group, United Nations Commission on Science and Technology for Development. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre in Association with Intermediate Technology Publications and UNIFEM.
   Google Scholar
• Hebert, L. A. 2007. “Taking 'Difference' Seriously: Feminisms and the 'Man Question'.” Journal of Gender Studies 16 (1): 31–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedström, J. 2019. “Confusion, Seduction, Failure: Emotions as Reflexive Knowledge in Conflict Settings.” International Studies Review 21 4: 662–677. doi:10.1093/isr/viy063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heneghan, H. 2013. “the Decision Point”: Why Female Officers “Opt Out” of a Career in the Defence Forces.” Defence Forces Review 171–180.
   Google Scholar
• Ishizuka, K. 2004. Ireland and International Peacekeeping Operations 1960-2000: A Study of Irish Motivation. London: Frank Cass & Co Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Keatinge, P., and B. Tonra. 2002. The European Rapid Reaction Force. Dublin: Institute of European Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Kronsell, A. 2006. “Methods for Studying Silences: Gender Analysis in Institutions of Hegemonic Masculinity.” In Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, edited by B. Ackerly, M. Stern, and J. True, 111. UK: Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kronsell, A. 2012. Gender, Sex and the Postnational Defense: Militarism and Peacekeeping. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kronsell, A., and E. Svedberg. 2012. Making Gender, Making War: Violence, Military and Peacekeeping Practices. New York, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, M. 2009. “Securitization and Desecuritization: Female Soldiers and the Reconstruction of Women in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone”, Security Studies, 18:2, 241–261, DOI: 10.1080/09636410902900061.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, M. 2012. “UNSCR 1325: Just Add Women and Stir*a Recipe for Gender Stereotyping in Peacekeeping Operations?” In Building a Better Future: Contributions by the Irish Defence Forces, edited by T. Walsh. Co. Kildare, Ireland: NUI Maynooth.
   Google Scholar
• Sangarasivam, Y. 2001. “Me * Informant, ‘Assassin,’ Researcher.” Geographical Review 91 (1/2): 95–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrianakis, A. 2006. “Call to Arms: The University as a Site of Militarized Capitalism and a Site of Struggle.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 35 (1): 139–154. doi:10.1177/03058298060350011201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvester, C. 2019. ”Voice, silence, agency, confusion”.” In Rethinking Silence, Voice and Agency in Contested Gendered Terrains, edited by J. L. Parpart and S. Parashar, 16–20. UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, J. A. 1993. Gender in International Relations Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TNS MRbi. 2007. Recruitment and Retention of Women in the Irish DF.
   Google Scholar