Introduction to special section: from Nordic exceptionalism to a third order priority – variations of “Nordicness” in foreign and security policy

References

• Aggestam, L. (2004). A European foreign policy? Role conceptions and the politics of identity in Britain, France and Germany. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Aggestam, L. (2006). Role theory and European foreign policy. In O. Elgström, & M. Smith (Eds.), The European Union’s roles in international politics: Concepts and analysis (pp. 11–29). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Åselius, G. (2005). Swedish strategic culture after 1945. Cooperation and Conflict, 40(1), 25–44. doi: 10.1177/0010836705049732
   Google Scholar
• Brommesson, D. (2015). The Europeanization of Swedish foreign policy and beyond: On multiple roles in Swedish post-cold-war foreign policy. In J. Pierre (Ed.), The Oxford handbook on Swedish politics (pp. 529–543). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brommesson, D., & Ekengren, A.-M. (2017). The mediatization, political decision-making and humanitarian intervention. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Checkel, J. (2005). International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization, 59(4), 801–826. doi: 10.1017/S0020818305050289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doeser, F., Petersson, M., & Westberg, J. (Eds.). (2012). Norden mellan stormakter och fredsförbund: Nordiskt säkerhetspolitiskt samarbete i det gamla och nya Europa. Stockholm: Santérus.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, T. (2013). The rise of Nordic defence cooperation: A return to regionalism? International Affairs, 89(3), 1161–1181. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12065
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, T., Græger, N., Leira, H., Løvold, A., Rahbek-Clemmensen, J., Rasmussen, M. V., & Strömvik, M. (2009). Nordic security competence: Bibliography on the foreign and security policy of the Nordic countries. Oslo: NUPI. 99 p.
   Google Scholar
• Graeger, N. (2011). Norden – making a difference? Possibilities for enhanced Nordic cooperation in international affairs. In T. Tiilikainen & K. Korhonen (Eds.), Norden – making a difference? Possibilities of enhanced Nordic cooperation in international affairs, FIIA REPORT 29. Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Græger, N., Larsen, H., & Ojanen, H. (2002). The ESDP and the Nordic countries: Four variations on a theme. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs / Berlin: Institut für Europäische Politik. 236 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Græger, N., & Leira, H. (2005). Norwegian strategic culture after world war II: From a local to a global perspective. Cooperation and Conflict, 40(1), 45–66. doi: 10.1177/0010836705049733
   Google Scholar
• Harnisch, S. (2011). Role theory: Operationalization of key concepts. In S. Harnisch, C. Frank, & H. W. Maull (Eds.), Role theory in international relations—approaches and analyses (pp. 7–15). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heikka, H. (2005). Republican realism. Finnish strategic culture in historical perspective. Cooperation and Conflict, 40(1), 91–119. doi: 10.1177/0010836705049736
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, K. J. (1970). National role conceptions in the study of foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly, 14(3), 233–309. doi: 10.2307/3013584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde-Price, A. (2004). European security, strategic culture, and the use of force. European Security, 13(4), 323–343. doi: 10.1080/09662830490499993
   Google Scholar
• Jepperson, R., Wendt, A., & Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). Norms, identity, and culture in national security. In P. J. Katzenstein (Ed.), The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics (pp. 33–75). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1998). The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization, 52(4), 943–969. doi: 10.1162/002081898550699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, N. (2015). Beacon of liberty: Role conceptions, crises and stability in Georgia’s foreign policy, 2004–2012. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Ojanen, H. (2005). Finland: Rediscovering its Nordic neighbours after an EU honeymoon? Security Dialogue, 36(3), 407–411. doi: 10.1177/0967010605057971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, M. R., & Wivel, A. (2015). Hvad blev der af den klassiske Kold Krigs-aktivisme?: Den nordiske dimensionen i dansk udenrigspolitik. Politik, 18(4), 14–24.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, M. V. (2005). “What’s the use of it?”: Danish strategic culture and the utility of armed force. Cooperation and Conflict, 40(1), 67–89. doi: 10.1177/0010836705049735
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T. (2000). Let’s argue! — Communicative action in world politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Schouenborg, L. (2013). The scandinavian international society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stegmann McCallion, M., & Brianson, A. (Eds.). (2018). Nordic states and European integration. Awkward partners in the north? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, J. (2016). Nordic political and economic cooperation: Context, history and outlook. Forum Paper in ASEAN Energy Market Integration (AEMI), Energy Security and Connectivity: The Nordic and European Union Approaches.
   Google Scholar
• Thorhallsson, B., & Bailes, A. J. (2017). Do small states need “alliance shelter”? Scotland and the Nordic nations. In A. W. Neal (Ed.), Security in small nation: Scotland, democracy, politics (pp. 49–76). Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tiilikainen, T., & Korhonen, K. (Eds.). (2011). Norden – making a difference? Possibilities of enhanced Nordic cooperation in international affairs, FIIA REPORT 29. Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar