Why American grand strategy has changed: international constraint, generational shift, and the return of realism

References

• Allison, G. T., & Halperin, M. H. (1972). Bureaucratic politics: A paradigm and some policy Implications. World Politics, 24(S1), 40–79. doi: 10.2307/2010559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmus, R. D. (1993). The new U.S. Strategic debate. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
   Google Scholar
• Bacevich, A. J. (1999). Policing Utopia: The military Imperatives of Globalization. The National Interest, 56, 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, J. A. (2012). Obama and China's rise: An insider's account of America's Asia strategy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brands, H. (2016). Barack Obama and the dilemmas of American grand strategy. The Washington Quarterly, 39(4), 101–125. doi: 10.1080/0163660X.2016.1261557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brands, H. (2018). American grand strategy in the age of Trump. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brighi, E. (2007). Europe, the USA and the ‘policy of the pendulum’: The importance of foreign policy paradigms in the foreign policy of Italy (1989–2005). Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 9(2), 99–115. doi: 10.1080/14613190701414103
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, P. J. (1990). America first. Second and Third. The National Interest, 19, 77–82.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, G. W. (2010). Decision points (1st ed). New York: Crown Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. G. (1992). A search for enemies: America's alliances after the cold war. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, R. G., & Scott, J. M. (2009). Choosing to lead. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, T., & Seo, J. (2018). Trump by Nixon: Maverick presidents in the years of US relative decline. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 30(1), 79–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Ricketts, A. (2017). Did Obama have a grand strategy? Journal of Strategic Studies, 40(1–2), 295–324. doi: 10.1080/01402390.2017.1284660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, B. (2004). My life. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, W. J. (1993). Remarks at the American University Centennial Celebration.
   Google Scholar
• Colas, A. (2008). Open Doors and Closed Frontiers: The limits of American Empire. European Journal of International Relations, 14, 619–643. doi: 10.1177/1354066108097555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, G. T. (2019). Unfit for office. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/10/george-conway-trump-unfit-office/599128/.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M. (2001). The new liberal Empire: US power in the twenty-first Century. Irish Studies in International Affairs, 12, 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Drezner, D. W. (2011). Does Obama have a grand strategy: Why we need doctrines in uncertain times. Foreign Affairs, 90, 57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dueck, C. (2006). Reluctant crusaders: Power, culture, and change in American grand strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dumbrell, J. (2009). Clinton's foreign policy: Between the Bushes, 1992-2000. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eldersveld, S. J., & Walton, H. (2000). Political parties in American society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Exadaktylos, T. (2015). Policy paradigms. In K. E. Jorgensen, ÅK Aarstad, E. Drieskens, K. Laatikainen, & B. Tonra (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of European foreign policy (pp. 488–500). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fidler, D. P. (2017). President Trump, trade policy, and American grand strategy: From common advantage to collective carnage. Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy, 1, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B. H., & Logan, J. (2016). Why Washington doesn't debate grand strategy. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 10, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. L. (1994, March 31). U.S. ending curbs on high-tech gear to cold war foes. The New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Goldgeier, J. M., & Tetlock, P. E. (2001). Psychology and international Relations theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 67–92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldmann, K. (1988). Change and stability in foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, J. (1999). How should we study foreign policy change? Cooperation and Conflict, 34(1), 73–95. doi: 10.1177/00108369921961780
   Google Scholar
• Guzzini, S. (2005). From (alleged) unipolarity to the decline of multilateralism? A power-theoretical critique. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS).
   Google Scholar
• Guzzini, S. (2009). On the measure of power and the power of measure in international relations. DIIS Working Paper, (2009/28). Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS).
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (1986). Governing the economy: The politics of state intervention in Britain and France. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275. doi: 10.2307/422246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallams, E. (2011). From Crusader to Exemplar: Bush, Obama and the Reinvigoration of America’s Soft power. European Journal of American Studies, 6(6-1). Retrieved from https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/9157
   Google Scholar
• Halperin, M. H., & Woods, M. J. (1990). Ending the Cold War at home. Foreign Policy, 81, 128–143. doi: 10.2307/1148812
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harries, O., & Lind, M. (1993). Realism and its rivals. The National Interest, 34, 110–112.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, O. (2012). Constructing America's freedom agenda for the Middle East: Democracy or domination. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, C. (2011). Beyond the “Obama effect”: Refining the instruments of engagement through US public diplomacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(6), 784–802. doi: 10.1177/0002764211400571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermann, C. F. (1990). Changing course: When Governments Choose to Redirect foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly, 34(1), 3. doi: 10.2307/2600403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsti, K. J. (1982). Why nations realign: Foreign policy restructuring in the postwar world. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J., Michael, M., & William, C. W. (2009). Unipolarity, state behavior, and systemic consequences. World Politics, 61, 1–27. doi: 10.1017/S004388710900001X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, R. (2009). Unipolarity: A structural perspective. World Politics, 61, 188–213. doi: 10.1017/S0043887109000070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe, J. (1997). How America does it. Foreign Affairs, 76, 13–27. doi: 10.2307/20048197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, R., & Schmitt, G. (1998). Now may we please defend ourselves? Commentary, July.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, P. (1992). Grand strategies and less-than-grand strategies: A twentieth Century Critique. In L. Freedman, P. M. Hayes, & R. J. O'Neill (Eds.), War, strategy, and international politics: Essays in honour of Sir Michael Howard (pp. 227–242). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, J. (1990). A normal country in a normal time. The National Interest, 21, 40–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, J. (2000). American power - For what? A symposium. Commentary (New York, N Y), 109, 21–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, N. (2010). Systemic pressures and domestic ideas: A neoclassical realist model of grand strategy formation. Review of International Studies, 36, 117–143. doi: 10.1017/S0260210509990532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchen, N. (2012). Ideas of power and the power of ideas. In A. Toje & B. Kunz (Eds.), Neoclassical Realism in European Politics: Bringing Power Back (pp. 79–95). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, N. (2013). Structural shifts and strategic change: From the War on Terror to the Pivot to Asia. In M. Bentley & J. Holland (Eds.), Obama's Foreign Policy: Ending the War on Terror (pp. 71–85). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, N. (2016). Ending ‘permanent war’: Security and economy under Obama. In M. Bentley & J. Holland (Eds.), The Obama Doctrine: A Legacy of Continuity in US Foreign Policy? (pp. 9–25). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, N., & Cox, M. (2019). Power, structural power, and American decline. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/09557571.2019.1606158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. (2002). The natural: The misunderstood presidency of bill Clinton (1st ed.). New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Kleistra, Y., & Mayer, I. (2001). Stability and Flux in foreign affairs: Modelling policy and Organizational change. Cooperation and Conflict, 36(4), 381–414. doi: 10.1177/00108360121962515
   Google Scholar
• Kristol, W., & Kagan, R. (1996). Toward a neo-reaganite foreign policy. Foreign Affairs, 75, 18–32. doi: 10.2307/20047656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kupchan, C. A. (1994). The vulnerability of empire. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kupchan, C. A. (1998). After Pax Americana: Benign power, regional integration, and the sources of a stable multipolarity. International Security, 23, 40–79. doi: 10.1162/isec.23.2.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupchan, C. A. (2010). Enemies into friends: How the United States can court its adversaries. Foreign Affairs, 89(2), 120–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laderman, C., & Simms, B. (2017). Donald Trump: The making of a world view. London: Endeavour Media.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, A. (1993). From containment to enlargement. US Department of State Dispatch, 4(2), 658–664.
   Google Scholar
• Layne, C. (2006a). The peace of illusions: American grand strategy from 1940 to the present. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Layne, C. (2006b). The Poster Child for offensive realism: America as a global hegemon. Security Studies, 12, 120–164. doi: 10.1080/0963-640291906816
   Google Scholar
• Levy, J. S. (2009). Learning and foreign policy: Sweeping a conceptual minefield. International Organization, 48(02), 279–312. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300028198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, T. (2015). Latin America confronts the United States: Asymmetry and influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luttwak, E. (2001). Strategy: The logic of war and peace. Cambridge: Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, J. (2004). Rise of the vulcans: The history of Bush’s war cabinet. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Maynes, C. W. (1990). America without the Cold War. Foreign Policy, 78, 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• McCrisken, T. (2013). Obama’s war on terrorism in rhetoric and practice. In M. Bentley & J. Holland (Eds.), Obama's Foreign Policy: Ending the War on Terror (pp. 27–54). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meaney, N. (1991). American decline and American nationalism. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 45(1), 89–97. doi: 10.1080/10357719108445052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (2018). The great delusion: Liberal dreams and international realities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. (2011). Under Obama, an emerging global apparatus for drone killing. The Washington Post, 28.
   Google Scholar
• Morillo, J. P. (1994). The Clinton administration's new national export strategy. Law and Policy in International Business, 25(4), 1113–1128.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (1990). The peace dividend. New York Review of Books, 37.
   Google Scholar
• Naughton, P. (2009, 13/1/09). Hillary Clinton says ‘smart power’ will restore American leadership. The Times.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, I. C. (2018). Grand strategy vs. emergent strategy in the conduct of foreign policy. Journal of Strategic Studies, 41(3), 438–460. doi: 10.1080/01402390.2017.1288109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, P. (2018). Why America's grand strategy has not changed: Power, habit, and the U.S. Foreign policy establishment. International Security, 42(04), 9–46. doi: 10.1162/isec_a_00311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posen, B. (1984). The sources of military doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the world wars. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Posen, B. R. (2014). Restraint: A new foundation for US grand strategy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, E. S. (2014). The dollar trap. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Project for a New American Century. (2000). Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, A. (2011). The art of declining politely: Obama’s prudent presidency and the waning of American power. International Affairs, 87(4), 803–824. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, A., & Kitchen, N. (2018). Understanding American power: Conceptual clarity. Strategic Priorities, and the Decline Debate. Global Policy, 10(1), 5–18. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, B. (2019). The world as it is: A memoir of the Obama White House. New York: Random House Trade Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Rodman, P. W. (1992). The danger of putting economics first.
   Google Scholar
• Rosati, J. A., Hagan, J. D., & Sampson, M. W. (1994). Foreign policy restructuring: How governments respond to global change. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothkopf, D. (2014, June 4). Obama’s ‘Don’t do stupid shit’ foreign policy. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from https://foreignpolicy.com/2014/06/04/obamas-dont-do-stupid-shit-foreign-policy/
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, D. (2016). The aspiring novelist who became Obama’s foreign-policy Guru. New York Times, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Schweller, R. L. (2004). Unanswered threats: A neoclassical realist theory of underbalancing. International Security, 29, 159–201. doi: 10.1162/0162288042879913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweller, R. L. (2006). Unanswered threats: Political constraints on the balance of power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Sciolino, E. (1998). Nuclear anxiety: the point man; Berger manages a welter of crises in the post-cold-war white house.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, P. (2011). Obama, Clinton and the diplomacy of change. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 6(3–4), 393–411. doi: 10.1163/187119111X583969
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. G. (2016). Predator empire: Drone warfare and full spectrum dominance. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silove, N. (2018). Beyond the Buzzword: The three Meanings of “grand strategy”. Security Studies, 27(1), 27–57. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2017.1360073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, J. L. (1977). The Soviet strategic culture: Implications for limited nuclear operations: A Project Air force report prepared for the United States Air force. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
   Google Scholar
• Steel, R. (1995). Temptations of a superpower. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taliaferro, J. W. (2006). State building for future wars: Neoclassical realism and the resource-extractive state. Security Studies, 15, 464–495. doi: 10.1080/09636410601028370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transcript of the Third Presidential Debate. (2012, October 22). New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, O. (2014). 16 The US ‘pivot’to the Asia Pacific. In Obama and the world: New directions in US foreign policy (p. 219).
   Google Scholar
• Walt, S. M. (2018). The Hell of good intentions: America's foreign policy elite and the decline of U.S. Primacy (1st ed.). New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, D. A. (2005). Painful choices. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weyrich, P. (1990). A populist policy. The National Interest, 21, 48–61.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlforth, W. (1993). The elusive balance: Power and perceptions during the Cold War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlforth, W. C. (1999). The stability of a unipolar world. International Security, 24, 5–41. doi: 10.1162/016228899560031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenko, M. (2013). Reforming US drone strike policies. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
   Google Scholar