The EU, migration and contestation: the UN Global Compact for migration, from consensus to dissensus

References

• Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft Law in international governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbé, E., & Badell, D. (2020). The European Union and Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems: United in Diversity?. In: E. Johansson-Nogués, M. Vlaskamp, & E. Barbé (Eds.), European Union Contested: Foreign Policy in a New Global Context (pp. 133–52) Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bonjour, S., Ripoll Servent, A., & Thielemann, E. (2018). Beyond venue shopping and liberal Constraint: A New research agenda for EU migration policies and politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(3), 409–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulgaria. (2017). Statement by the Republic of Bulgaria on human rights of All migrants. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Cassarino, J. P. (2018). Beyond the criminalisation of migration: A Non-Western perspective. International Journal of Migration and Border Studies, 4(4), 397–411.
   Google Scholar
• Ceccorulli, M., & Lucarelli, S. (2017). Migration and the EU global strategy: Narratives and dilemmas. The International Spectator, 52(3), 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerulus, L. (2018, December 12). The man who Broke Belgium’s government. Retrieved from https://www.politico.eu/article/theo-franckenthe-man-who-broke-belgium-government/
   Google Scholar
• Cerulu, L., & Schaart, E. (2019). How the UN migration pact got trolled. Politico. Retrieved January 7, 2021, from politico.eu/article/united-nations-migration-pact-how-got-trolled/
   Google Scholar
• Costa, O., Kissack, R., & Barbé, E. (2016). Accommodating or entrenching? How the EU is dealing with changes in the multilateral system. In E. Barbé, O. Costa, & R. Kissack (Eds.), EU policy responses to a shifting multilateral system (pp. 1–23). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, O., & Müller, P. (2019). Une Liaison Transnationale: Exploring the role of NGOs in EU foreign Policymaking on the ICC. Comparative European Politics, 17, 696–713.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, O., Collantes-Celador., G & Badell, D. (Forthcoming). The dog that did not bark: The EU and the clash between security and justice in the International Criminal Court. European Security.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. (2018). European Council conclusions on migration, security and defence, jobs, growth and competitiveness, innovation and digital, and on other issues. Brussels: Council of the EU.
   Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, N., & Zimmermann, L. (2018). Things we lost in the fire: How different types of contestation affect the robustness of international norms. International Studies Review, 22(1), 51–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, N., & Zimmermann, L. (2019). Norms under challenge: Unpacking the dynamics of norm Robustness. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(1), 2–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diez, T. (2005). Constructing the self and changing others: Reconsidering “normative power Europe”. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 613–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgström, O. (2017). Norm advocacy networks: Nordic and like-minded countries in EU gender and development policy. Cooperation and Conflict, 52(2), 224–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EUGS. (2016). European union global strategy. Brussels: EEAS.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015). A European agenda on migration. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). Remarks by Commissioner Dimitris Avramopoulos during the opening plenary of the intergovernmental conference on the Global Compact for safe, orderly and regular migration. Marrakech: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019). The European agenda on migration: EU needs to Sustain progress made over the past 4 years. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2018). EU priorities at the United Nations and the 73rd United Nations General Assembly (September 2018–September 2019). Brussels: European Council.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2019). A new strategic agenda for the EU (2019–2024). Brussels: European Council.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2018a). MEPs strongly welcome the Global Compact on migration. Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2018b). Progress on the UN Global Compacts for safe, orderly and regular migration and on refugees. Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2017a). Fifth informal thematic session. Vienna: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2017b). First informal thematic session. New York: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2017c). Fourth informal thematic session. New York: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2017d). The new European consensus on development: Our world, our dignity, our future. Brussels: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2017e). Third informal thematic Session. Geneva: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, E. G., & Donato, K. M. (2020). Refugees, migration and global governance: Negotiating the Global Compacts. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, S. (2019). All at sea: Europe’s crisis of solidarity on migration. Brussels: European Council on Foreign Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S. W., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2019). Migration: A step too far for the contemporary global order? Journal of European Public Policy, 27(7), 1103–1113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiraudon, V. (2000). European integration and migration policy: Vertical policy-making as venue shopping. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, N. (2019). Norm contestation in the digital era: Campaigning for refugee rights. International Affairs, 95(3), 575–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, V. (2019). Orban calls for an anti-immigrant takeover of EU Institutions. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/046bde3a-14dc-11e9-a581-4ff78404524e
   Google Scholar
• Hungary. (2018). Security first. New York: Government of Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Iommi, L. G. (2019). Norm internalisation revisited: Norm contestation and the life of norms at the extreme of the norm Cascade. Global Constitutionalism, 9(1), 76–116.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson-Nogués, E., Vlaskamp, M., & Barbé, E. (2020). EU foreign policy and norm contestation in an eroding Western and intra-EU liberal order. In E. Johansson-Nogués, M. Vlaskamp, & E. Barbé (Eds.), European Union contested: Foreign policy in a new global context (pp. 1–16). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, K. E., & Costa, O. (2012). When multilateralism Hits Brussels: Generalizations and an agenda for further research. In K. E. Jørgensen, & O. Costa (Eds.), The influence of international institutions on the EU (pp. 248–257). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Juncos, A. E., & Pomorska, K. (2011). Invisible and unaccountable? National representatives and council officials in EU foreign policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(8), 1096–1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaunert, C., & Léonard, S. (2012). The development of the EU asylum policy: Venue-shopping in perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(9), 1396–1413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissack, R. (2012). The top-down dimension of the relationship between the EU and international institutions: Taking stock. In K. E. Jørgensen, & O. Costa (Eds.), The influence of international institutions on the EU (pp. 228–247). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Klotz, A. (1999). Norms in international relations: The struggle against apartheid. Cornell: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoll, A., & Weijer, F. D. (2016). Understanding African and European perspectives on migration: Towards a better partnership for regional migration governance? ECDPM, 203, 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. (2016). Multilevelling EU external governance: The role of international organizations in the diffusion of EU migration policies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(4), 554–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S., & Kunz, R. (2008). The migration–development Nexus in EU external relations. Journal of European Integration, 30(3), 439–457.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2005). The Janus Face of Brussels: Socialization and everyday decision making in the European Union. International Organization, 59(4), 937–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manners, I. (2002). Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1998). The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization, 52(4), 943–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín Díaz, E., & Aris Escarcena, J. P. (2019). The European Union and the background of the Global Compacts. International Migration, 57(6), 273–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melin, P. (2019). The Global Compact for migration: Lessons for the unity of EU representation. European Journal of Migration and Law, 21(2), 194–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalski, A., & Danielson, A. (2020). Overcoming dissent: Socialization in the EU’s political and security committee in a context of crises. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(2), 328–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, F. (2018, October 31). Austria to Shun Global Migration Pact, fearing creep in Human Rights. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-un-migrants-austria-idUSKCN1N50JZ
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. (2018). Speech delivered by Commissioner Stylianides on behalf of HR/VP Mogherini, during the EP Debate on the Global Compact on Migration, 13 November 2018. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• PAP. (2018, November 25). Poland will not support UN pact on migration. Retrieved from https://www.pap.pl/en/news/news%2C360992%2Cpoland-will-not-support-un-pact-migration.html
   Google Scholar
• Reslow, N. (2019). Horizontal and vertical diversity: Unintended consequences of EU external migration policy. International Spectator, 54(1), 31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2018). European integration (theory) in times of crisis. A comparison of the Euro and Schengen crises. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(7), 969–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scipioni, M. (2018). Failing forward in EU migration policy? EU integration after the 2015 asylum and migration crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(9), 1357–1375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, V. (2019). A milestone missed: The Global Compact on migration and the limits of solidarity. Global Affairs, 5(2), 155–162.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. C. (2011). Making EU foreign policy: National preferences, European norms and common policies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Trauner, F., & Ripoll Servent, A. (2016). The communitarization of the area of freedom, security and justice: Why institutional change does not translate into policy change. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(6), 1417–1432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2017). Modalities for the intergovernmental conferences to adopt the Global Compact for safe, orderly and regular migration statement of financial implications (A/72/676). New York: UN General Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2018). UN Global Compact for migration. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United States. (2018). National statement of the United States of America on the adoption of the Global Compact for safe, orderly, and regular migration. New York: United States Mission to the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. (2017). A theory of contestation-a concise summary of its argument and concepts. Polity, 49(1), 105–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaun, N. (2017). EU asylum policies: The power of strong regulating states. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar