The image of subsurface geology

References

• Aase, T. H., & Fossåskaret, E. (2014). Skapte virkeligheter: om produksjon og tolkning av kvalitative data (2. Utg). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Bertin, J. (1981). Graphics and graphic information-processing. New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Boukhelifa, N., Bezerianos, A., Isenberg, T., & Fekete, J.-D. (2012). Evaluating sketchiness as a visual variable for the depiction of qualitative uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 18(12), 2769–2778. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2012.220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukhelifa, N., & Duke, D. J. (2009). Uncertainty visualization – Why might it fall? In CHI'09 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 4051–4056). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., de Beer, J., Mielby, S., van Campenhout, I., van Der Meulen, M., Erikkson, I., … Jelenek, J. (2017). Transforming the relationships between geoscientists and urban decision-makers: European cost sub-urban action (TU1206). Procedia Engineering, 209, 4–11. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.124
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, J. W. (2016). Transcribing from the mind to the map: Tracing the evolution of a concept. Geographical Review, 106(3), 338–359. doi: 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2016.12193.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çöltekin, A., Fabrikant, S. I., & Lacayo, M. (2010). Exploring the efficiency of users’ visual analytics strategies based on sequence analysis of eye movement recordings. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(10), 1559–1575. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2010.511718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dan, A., & Reiner, M. (2017). EEG-based cognitive load of processing events in 3D virtual worlds is lower than processing events in 2D displays. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 122, 75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.08.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, K. (2008). Cartographers have the user in mind. The Cartographic Journal, 45(2), 83–83. doi: 10.1179/174327708X305067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J., Burke, H., Royse, K., & Mathers, S. (2008). The 3D geology of London and the Thames Gateway: a modern approach to geological surveying and its relevance in the urban environment. In: Cities and their underground environment: 2nd European conference of International Association of engineering geology: Euroengeo, Madrid, Spain, 15–20 Sept 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, C., & Schweikart, J. (2017). Mental representation of landmarks on maps: Investigating cartographic visualization methods with eye tracking technology. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 17(1–2), 20–38. doi: 10.1080/13875868.2016.1219912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieseking, J. J. (2013). Where we go from here. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(9), 712–724. doi: 10.1177/1077800413500926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, P., & White, R. (1986). Mental maps (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. (2010). Interacting with geospatial technologies (1). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Häggquist, E., & Söderholm, P. (2015). The economic value of geological information: Synthesis and directions for future research. Resources Policy, 43, 91–100. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, H., & Mathers, S. J. (2006). The past, present and future of 3D geology in BGS. Journal Open University Geological Society, 27(2), 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kraak, Menno-Jan, and Ferjan Ormeling. (2010). Cartography – visualization of spatial data. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Libarkin, J. C. (2016). Teaching and assessing through drawing. In Abstracts with Programs – Geological Society of America, Vol. 48. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America GSA.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, Kevin. (1960). The image of the city. Publication (Joint Center for Urban Studies). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, Alan, Roth, Robert, O'Brien, James, Li, Bonan, Swingley, Derek, & Gahegan, Mark. (2012). Visual semiotics & uncertainty visualization: An empirical study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12), 2496–2505. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2012.279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mielby, S., Eriksson, I., Diarmad, S., Campbell, G., & Lawrence, D. (2017). Opening up the subsurface for the cities of tomorrow. The subsurface in the planning process. Procedia Engineering, 209, 12–25. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.125
   Google Scholar
• Ooms, Kristien. (2016). Open meeting ICA commission on use, user & usability issues. Albena, Bulgaria, n.d. https://www.slideshare.net/UUUIICA/2016-iccgis-openmeeting-66491642.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S., & Hoopes, J. (1991). Peirce on signs: Writings on semiotic. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. H., Morrison, J. L., Muehrcke, P. C., Jon Kimerling, A., & Guptill, S. C. (1995). Elements of cartography (6th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2001). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of visual materials. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schokker, J., Sandersen, P., de Beer, H., Eriksson, I., Kallio, H., Kearsey, T., … Siether, A. (2017). 3D urban subsurface modelling and visualization: A review of good practices and techniques to ensure optimal use of geological information in urban planning. In TU1206 COST Sub-Urban WG2 Report. TU1206-WG2.3-004.
   Google Scholar
• Stea, D., & Downs, R. M. (1973). Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Suchan, T. A., & Brewer, C. A. (2000). Qualitative methods for research on mapmaking and map use. Professional Geographer, 52(1), 145–154. doi: 10.1111/0033-0124.00212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Land, S., Schouten, A. P., Feldberg, F., van der Hoff, B., & Huysman, M. (2013). Lost in space? Cognitive fit and cognitive load in 3D virtual environments. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 29(3), 1054–1064.
   Google Scholar
• van der Meulen, M. J., Campbell, S. D. G., Lawrence, D. J., Lois González, R. C., & Van Campenhout, I. A. M. (2016). Out of sight out of mind? Considering the subsurface in urban planning-state of the art. In COST TU1206 Sub-Urban Report, TU1206-WG1-001.
   Google Scholar
• Walny, Jagoda, Huron, Samuel and Carpendale, Sheelagh. (2015). An exploratory study of data sketching for visual representation. Eurographics Conference on Visualization (EuroVis).
   Google Scholar
• WriteWords. (2018, March 25). Word Frequency Counter. http://www.writewords.org.uk/word_count.asp.
   Google Scholar