Engagement, communication and context: the success of the human-map nexus

References

• Barnlund, D. (1970). A transactional model of communication. In K. Sereno, & C. Mortensen (Eds.), Foundations of communication theory (pp. 83–102). Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Bartling, M., Robinson, A., Resch, B., Eitzinger, A., & Atzmanstorfer, K. (2021). The role of user context in the design of mobile map applications. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 48(5), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2021.1933595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Board, C. (1967). Maps as models. In R. J. Chorley, & P. Haggett (Eds.), Models in geography (pp. 671–725). Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Board, C. (1978). How can theories of cartographic communication be used to make maps more efficient? In G. Kirschbaum, & K. Meine (Eds.), Internationales Jahrbuch für Kartographie (pp. 41–49). Kirschbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Buchroithner, M., & Fernandez, P. (2011). Cartography in the context of sciences: Theoretical and technological considerations. The Cartographic Journal, 48(1), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277411Y.0000000003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavell, R. (1999). McLuhan and spatial communication. Western Journal of Communication, 63(3), 348–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319909374646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. (2001). Maps as social constructions: Power, communication and visualization. Progress in Human Geography, 25(2), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201678580494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, D., Gartner, G., & Peterson, M. (2021). Epistemological thoughts on the success of maps and the role of cartography. International Journal of Cartography, 7(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2021.1972909
   Google Scholar
• Freitag, U. (1979). Grundlagen, Aufbau und zukünftige Aufgaben der kartographischen Wissenschaft. In H. Bosse (Ed.), Kartographische Aspekte in der Zukunft (pp. 31–58). Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kartographie.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. (1996). Affordances for interaction: The social is material for design. Ecological Psychology, 8(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0802_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genosko, G. (2012). Remodelling communication: From WWII to the WWW. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, A., White, T., Fish, C., Tomio, B., Huang, H., Sluter, C. R., Bravo, J. V. M., Fabrikant, S. I., Bleisch, S., Yamada, M., & Picanço, P. (2017). Designing across map use contexts: A research agenda. International Journal of Cartography, 3(sup1), 90–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1315988
   Google Scholar
• Grygorenko, W. (1984). A cybernetic model of cartographic communication. In G. Kirschbaum, & K. Meine (Eds.), Internationales Jahrbuch für Kartographie (pp. 95–107). Kirschbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2012). Affordances in HCI: Toward a mediated action perspective. In J. Konstan, E. Chi, & K. Hook (Eds.), CHI’12 Proceedings (pp. 967–976). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, A. (2017). Cartographic style and the aesthetic fix. The Cartographic Journal, 54(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2017.1291556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, A. (2018). Form follows feedback: Rethinking cartographic communication. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 13(2), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klettner, S. (2020). Affective communication of Map symbols: A semantic differential analysis. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(5), 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9050289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolacny, A. (1969). Cartographic information—A fundamental concept and term in modern cartography. The Cartographic Journal, 6(1), 47–49. https://doi.org/10.1179/caj.1969.6.1.47
   Google Scholar
• Kühne, O. (2021). Potentials of the three spaces theory for understandings of cartography, virtual realities, and augmented spaces. KN - Journal of Cartography and Geographic Information, 71(4), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42489-021-00089-w
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. (1995). How maps work. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. (1953). Culture without literacy. Explorations, 1, 117–127.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M., Fiore, Q., & Agel, J. (1967). The medium is the massage. Gingko Press.
   Google Scholar
• Medynska-Gulij, B. (2009). Pragmatic pyramid of thematic mapping. In Proceedings of 24th international cartographic conference. ICA. https://icaci.org/files/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2009/html/refer/14_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Medyńska-Gulij, B. (2012). Pragmatische Kartographie in Google Maps API. KN - Journal of Cartography and Geographic Information, 62(5), 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03544493
   Google Scholar
• Meier, S., Tost, J., & Heidmann, F. (2019). On the relevance of cartography – An interaction design perspective. In H. Fujita (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Cartographic Association, 2, 84. https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-proc-2-84-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (1971). Marshall McLuhan. Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Mocnik, F.-B. (2023). Why we can read maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 50(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2022.2127911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. (2023). Cartography and geovisual analytics in personal contexts: Designing for the data creator. International Journal of Cartography, 9(2), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2023.2189431
   Google Scholar
• Nivala, A.-M., & Sarjakoski, L. T. (2003). Need for context-aware topographic maps in mobile devices. In Proceedings of ScanGIS 2003 (pp. 15–29). https://web.archive.org/web/20120915110619/http://www.scangis.org/scangis2003/papers/22.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (1988). The design of everyday things (1st edition). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things (revised and expanded edition). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. (1994). Cognitive issues in cartographic visualization. In A. MacEachren, & D. R. F. Taylor (Eds.), Visualization in modern cartography (pp. 27–44). Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. P. (1995). Interactive and animated cartography. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Rajkovic, N. (2018). The visual conquest of international law: Brute boundaries, the Map, and the legacy of cartogenesis. Leiden Journal of International Law, 31(2), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156518000146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratajski, A. (1973). The research structure of theoretical cartography. In E. Arnberger, & F. Aurada (Eds.), Internationales Jahrbuch für Kartographie (pp. 217–227). Bertelsmann.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A., & Petchenik, B. (1976). The nature of maps. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, N. (2003). Processual media theory. Symploke, 11(1), 104–131. https://doi.org/10.1353/sym.2003.0024
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R. (2012). Cartographic interaction primitives: Framework and synthesis. The Cartographic Journal, 49(4), 376–395. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277412Y.0000000019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E., Çöltekin, A., Delazari, L., Filho, H. F., Griffin, A., Hall, A., Korpi, J., Lokka, I., Mendonça, A., Ooms, K., & van Elzakker, C. P. J. M. (2017). User studies in cartography: Opportunities for empirical research on interactive maps and visualizations. International Journal of Cartography, 3(sup1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1288534
   Google Scholar
• Sarjakoski, L. T., & Nivala, A.-M. (2005). Adaptation to context – A way to improve the usability of mobile maps. In L. in Meng, A. Zipf, & T. Reichenbacher (Eds.), Map-based mobile services, theories, methods and implementations (pp. 107–123). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schroer, S. (2021). Jakob von Uexküll: The Concept of Umwelt and its Potentials for an Anthropology Beyond the Human. Ethnos, 86(1), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2019.1606841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiniger, S., Neun, M., & Edwardes, A. (2006). Foundations of location based services, chapter 1. In CartouCHe - Lecture Notes on LBS. University of Zurich and ETH Zurich. http://www.e-cartouche.ch/content_reg/cartouche/LBSbasics/en/html/LBSBasicsU3_learningObject1.html
   Google Scholar
• Sui, D., & Goodchild, M. (2003). A tetradic analysis of GIS and society using McLuhan’s law of the media. The Canadian Geographer, 47(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0064.02e08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Q., & Park, H. (2017). The map as an object of service design. The Design Journal, 20(S1), S4101–S4119. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352911
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. (1979). A transformational view of cartography. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 6(2), 101–106. DOI:10.1559/152304079784023104
   Google Scholar
• Tomaszewski, B., & MacEachren, A. (2012). Geovisual analytics to support crisis management: Information foraging for geo-historical context. Information Visualization, 11(4), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871612456122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zarycki, T. (2000). On the pragmatic approach to map analysis. In Proceedings of the ICA commission on theoretical cartography (pp. 64–70). International Cartographic Association.
   Google Scholar