REFERENCES
- Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed Effects Regression Models. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412993869
- American Institutes for Research. (2019). Academic screening tools charts. Retrieved from https://rti4success.org/resources/tools-charts
- Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. (2014). WIDA. Retrieved from https://www.wida.us/index.aspx
- Deno, S. L., Fuchs, L. S., Marston, D., & Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507–524. https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v30i3.6758
- Dewey, E. N., Powell-Smith, K. A., Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2015). Acadience Reading Technical Adequacy Brief. Dynamic Measurement Group, Inc.
- Dynamic Measurement Group, Inc. (2018). Acadience Reading Benchmark Goals andComposite Score. Retrieved from https://acadiencelearning.org
- Farnia, F., & Geva, E. (2013). Growth and predictors of change in English language learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, n/a–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrir.12003
- Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298605300301
- Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Deno, S. L. (1985). Importance of goal ambitiousness and goal mastery to student achievement. Exceptional Children, 52(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298505200108
- Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect?School Psychology Review, 22, 27–49.
- Gersten, R., Baker, S. K., Shanahan, T., Linan-Thompson, S., Collins, P., Scarcellla, R. (2007). Effective literacy and English language instruction for English learners in Elementary Grades: A practice guide (NCEE 2007-4011). Washington, DD: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides.
- Good, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., Dewey, E. N., Wallin, J., Powell-Smith, K. A., & Latimer, R. J. (2013a). Acadience Reading Technical Manual. Dynamic Measurement Group. Retrieved from https://acadiencelearning.org.
- Good, R. H., Powell-Smith, K. A., & Dewey, E. N. (2013b). DIBELS Pathways of Progress: Setting ambitious, meaningful, and attainable goals in grade level material. Dynamic Measurement Group. Retrieved from https://acadiencelearning.org.
- Good, R. H., Powell-Smith, K. A., & Dewey, E. N. (2016). Contribution of pathways of progress to predicting later reading outcomes. Dynamic Measurement Group. Retrieved from https://acadiencelearning.org.
- Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
- Graves, A. W., Plasencia-Peinado, J., Deno, S. L., & Johnson, J. R. (2005). Formatively evaluating the Reading progress of first-grade English learners in multiple-language classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 26(4), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325050260040401
- Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses related to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332
- Hattie, J. (2017). Visible learning plus: 250 influences on student achievement. Visible Learning Limited Partnership and Cognition Education Group. Retrieved from https://visible-learning.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/VLPLUS-252-Influences-Hattie-ranking-DEC-2017.pdf.
- Hosp, M. K., Hosp, J. L., & Howell, K. W. (2007). The ABCs of CBM: a practical guide to curriculum based measurement. Guilford.
- Hosp, M. K., Hosp, J. L., Howell, K. W., & Allison, R. (2014). The ABCs of Curriculum-Based Evaluation: a practical guide to effective decision making. Guilford.
- Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2018). Multilevel analysis. (3rd ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315650982
- Kieffer, M. J., & Thompson, K. D. (2018). Hidden progress of multilingual students on NAEP. Educational Researcher, 47(6)391-398. 0013189X1877774. https://doi.org/10.3102/,
- Kovaleski, J. F., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Shapiro, E. S. (2013). The RtI approach to evaluating learning disabilities. Guilford.
- Ludwig, C., Guo, K., & Georgiou, G. K. (2019). Are reading interventions for English learners effective? A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(3), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221941825855
- MacGinitie, W. H., & MacGinitie, R. K. (1992). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests. (2nd ed). Nelson.
- Michelmore, K., Dynarski, S. (2017). The income difference in education: the gap within the gap. EconoFact. Retrieved from https://econofact.org/income-differences-in-education-the-gap-within-the-gap
- Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2011). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. Oxford University Press.
- National Center for Educational Statistics. (2017). National Assessment of Educational Progress: An overview of NAEP. National center for educational Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
- National Institute of Child Health. (2000). Report of the National reading panel: Teaching children to read: Reports of the subgroup. U.S. Government Printing Office.
- Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education : theory and Practice, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
- Office of Special Education Programs (2018). Ideas That Work: Common questions for progress monitoring. Retrieved December 20, 2018, from https://osepideasthatwork.org/node/135
- Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
- Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Sage.
- Stuebing, K. K., Barth, A. E., Trahan, L. H., Reddy, R. R., Miciak, J., & Fletcher, J. M. (2015). Are child cognitive characteristics strong predictors of responses to intervention? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 395–429. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314555996
- Sullivan, G., & Artino, A. R.Jr., (2013). Analyzing and Interpreting Data From Likert-Type Scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541–542. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-5-4-18
- Umansky, I., Dumont, H. (2019). English learner labeling: How English learner status shapes teacher perceptions of student skills & the moderating role of bilingual instructional settings. (EdWorking Paper No. 19-94.) Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: http://www.edworkingpapers.com/ai19-94.
- Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., Capin, P., Miciak, J., Cho, E., & Fletcher, J. M. (2018). How initial word reading and language skills affect reading comprehension outcomes for students with reading difficulties. Exceptional Children, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029
- Wayman, M. M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H. I., Ticha, R., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 85–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070410020401
- WIDA Annual Technical Report. (2018). WIDA Annual Technical Report for ACCESS for ELLs® 2.0 Online English Language Proficiency Test (2017). Center for Applied Linguistics & Language Assessment Division Psychometrics and Quantitative Research Team. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin. http://www.cde.state.co.us/assessment/accessforellsonlinetechreport
- WIDA Consortium. (2007). ACCESS for ELLs: Scores, Reliability and Validity. ISBE Meeting. IL. Retrieved from https://slideplayer.com/slide/757716/
- Williams, K. T. (2001). Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation (GRADE). Pearson.
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. South-Western Cengage Learning.
- Zumbo, B. D., & Zimmerman, D. W. (1993). Is the selection of statistical methods governed by level of measurement?Canadian Psychology, 34(4), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078865