Assessment of Intellectual Disability With the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition: Analysis of Part Score Profiles and Diagnostic Outcomes

REFERENCES

• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement on Education (Eds.). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.) American Psychiatric Association.
   Google Scholar
• Artiles, A. J., Harry, B., Reschly, D. J., & Chinn, P. C. (2002). Over-identification of students of color in special education: A critical overview. Multicultural Perspectives, 4(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327892MCP0401_2
   Google Scholar
• Aston, C., & Brown, D. L. (2021). Progress or setback: Revisiting the current state of assessment practices of Black children. Contemporary School Psychology, 25(2), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-020-00308-7
   Google Scholar
• Benson, N. F., Floyd, R. G., Kranzler, J. H., Eckert, T. L., Fefer, S. A., & Morgan, G. B. (2019). Test use and assessment practices of school psychologists in the United States: Findings from the 2017 National Survey. Journal of School Psychology, 72, 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeron, R., & Floyd, R. G. (2006). Broad cognitive abilities of children with mental retardation: An analysis of group and individual profiles. American Journal of Mental Retardation : AJMR, 111(6), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[417:BCAOCW]2.0.CO;2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergeron, R., & Floyd, R. G. (2013). Individual part score profiles of children with intellectual disability: A descriptive analysis across three intelligence tests. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahan, S., Jurges, H., & Hannin, J. (2021). Cognitive profile patterns are affected by measurement precision. Journal of Education and Development, 5(1), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.20849/jed.v5i1.853
   Google Scholar
• Canivez, G. L. (2014). Construct validity of the WISC–IV with a referred sample: Direct versus indirect hierarchical structures. School Psychology Quarterly: The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 29(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canivez, G. L., Dombrowski, S. C., & Watkins, M. W. (2018). Factor structure of the WISC-V for four standardization age groups: Exploratory and hierarchical factor analyses with the 16 primary and secondary subtests. Psychology in the Schools, 55(7), 741–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canivez, G. L., McGill, R. J., Dombrowski, S. C., Watkins, M. W., Pritchard, A. E., & Jacobson, L. A. (2020). Construct validity of the WISC-V in clinical cases: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the 10 primary subtests. Assessment, 27(2), 274–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118811609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1949). Rp and other coefficients of pattern similarity. Psychometrika, 14(4), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, H., Zhang, O., Raiford, S. E., Zhu, J., & Weiss, L. G. (2015). Factor invariance between genders on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fifth Edition. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, S. L., Bridges, R. M., Luedke, J. C., & Eason, M. J. (2021). Dimensional evaluation of cognitive measures: Methodological confounds and theoretical concerns. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 39(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282920940879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dombrowski, S. C., Canivez, G. L., & Watkins, M. W. (2018). Factor structure of the 10 WISC-V primary subtests across four standardization age groups. Contemporary School Psychology, 22, 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-017-0125-2
   Google Scholar
• Dombrowski, S. C., McGill, R. J., Canivez, G. L., Watkins, M. W., & Beaujean, A. A. (2021). Factor analysis and variance partitioning in intelligence test research: Clarifying misconceptions. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 39(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282920961952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dombrowski, S. C., McGill, R. J., Watkins, M. W., Canivez, G. L., Jacobson, L., & Pritchard, A. (2021). Will the real theoretical structure of the WISC–V please stand up? An exploratory factor analytic replication study. Contemporary School Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-021-00365-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elliott, C. D. (2007). Differential ability scales (2nd ed.). Harcourt Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, R. L., & Floyd, R. G. (2018). Use of intelligence tests in the identification of children and adolescents with intellectual disability. In D. P. Flanagan & E. M. McDonough (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 643–661). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, R. L., McGill, R. J., Dombrowski, S. C., & Canivez, G. L. (2021). Why questionable assessment practices remain popular in school psychology: Instructional materials as pedagogic vehicles. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 36(2), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573520978111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, D. P., & Alfonso, V. C. (2017). Essentials of WISC-V assessment. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. G., Farmer, R. L., Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2021). Theories and measurement of intelligence. In L. M. Glidden (Ed.), APA handbook of intellectual and developmental disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 386–424). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, T. W., & Youngstrom, E. A. (2007). Historical increase in the number of factors measured by commercial tests of cognitive ability: Are we overfactoring? Intelligence, 35(2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freberg, M. E., Vandiver, B. J., Watkins, M. W., & Canivez, M. W. (2008). Significant factor score validity of the WISC-III Full Scale IQ in predicting later academic achievement. Applied Neuropsychology, 15(2), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09084280802084010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, S., & Mitchell, A. (2011). Is the moratorium over? African American psychology professionals views on intelligence testing in response to changes to federal policy. Journal of Black Psychology, 37(4), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798410394177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, S. L., Smith, L. V., & Nichols, K. D. (2021). Is the WISC-V a fair test for Black children: Factor structure in an urban public school sample. Contemporary School Psychology, 25(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-020-00306-9
   Google Scholar
• Green, C. E., Chen, C. E., Helms, J. E., & Henze, K. T. (2011). Recent reliability reporting practices in Psychological Assessment: Recognizing the people behind the data. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 656–669. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosp, J. L., & Reschly, D. J. (2004). Disproportionate representation of minority students in special education: Academic, demographic, and economic predictors. Exceptional Children, 70(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407000204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. S. (1994). Intelligent testing with the WISC-III. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman assessment battery for children (2nd ed.). American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacs, K., & Conway, A. R. A. (2016). Process overlap theory: A unified account of the general factor of intelligence. Psychological Inquiry, 27(3), 151–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2016.1153946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranzler, J. H., Maki, K. E., Benson, N. F., Eckert, T. L., Floyd, R. G., & Fefer, S. A. (2020). How do school psychologists interpret intelligence tests for the identification of specific learning disabilities? Contemporary School Psychology, 24(4), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-020-00274-0
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, A. B., & Farmer, R. L. (2020). The cognitive assessment course: Two decades later. Psychology in the Schools, 57(2), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGill, R. J., Dombrowski, S. C., & Canivez, G. L. (2018). Cognitive profile analysis in school psychology: History, issues, and continued concerns. Journal of School Psychology, 71, 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrew, K. S. (2015). Intellectual functioning. In E. Polloway (Ed.), The death penalty and intellectual disability (pp. 85–112). American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• McGrew, K. S. (2021). Is the intellectual functioning component of AAIDD’s 12th manual satisficing? Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 59(5), 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-59.5.369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, K., Milton, M., Smith, G., & Ouellette-Kuntz, H. (2016). Systematic review of the prevalence and incidence of intellectual disabilities: Current trends and issues. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 3(2), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-016-0085-7
   Google Scholar
• McNicholas, P. J., Floyd, R. G., Woods, I. L., Singh, L. J., Manguno, M. S., & Maki, K. E. (2018). State special education criteria for identifying intellectual disability: A review following revised diagnostic criteria and Rosa’s Law. School Psychology Quarterly : The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 33(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MedCalc Software Ltd. Diagnostic test evaluation calculator (Version 20.106). https://www.medcalc.org/calc/diagnostic_test.php
   Google Scholar
• National Association of School Psychologists. (2020). The professional standards of the National Association of School Psychologists. National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/raceindicators/index.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2021a). Children and youth with disabilities. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cgg
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2021b). Digest of educational statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d20/tables/dt20_204.50.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2002). Mental retardation: Determining eligibility for Social Security benefits. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M. R., Floyd, R. G., & Niileksela, C. R. (2013). How well is psychometric g indexed by global composites? Evidence from three popular intelligence tests. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1314–1321. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M. R., & Keith, T. Z. (2017). Multi-group and hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fifth Edition: What does it measure? Intelligence, 62, 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.02.005
   Google Scholar
• Schalock, R. L., Luckasson, R. A., & Tassé, M. J. (2021). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and system of supports (12th ed.). American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W. J. (2016). Why are WJ IV cluster scores more extreme than the average of their parts? A gentle explanation of the composite score extremity effect. In (Woodcock-Johnson IV Assessment Service Bulletin No. 7). Itasca, IL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2012). The Cattell–Horn–Carroll model of intelligence. In D. P. Flanagan & P. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (3rd ed., pp. 99–144). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2018). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & E. M. McDonough (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (4th ed., pp. 73–162). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Sotelo-Dynega, M., & Dixon, S. G. (2014). Cognitive assessment practices: A survey of school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 51(10), 1031–1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, M. M. (1974). Selected topics in advanced statistics: An elementary approach: III. Classification procedures: Profile similarity. Institute for Personality & Ability Test.
   Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, M. M., & Lohnes, P. R. (1988). Multivariate analysis: Techniques for educational and psychological research (2nd ed.). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Department of Education. (2004). Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 108-446.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, M. W. (2017). The reliability of multidimensional neuropsychological measures: From alpha to omega. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(6–7), 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1317364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, M. W., Canivez, G. L., Dombrowski, S. C., McGill, R. J., Pritchard, A. E., Holingue, C. B., & Jacobson, L. A. (2022). Long-term stability of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition scores in a clinical sample. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 11(3), 422–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2021.1875827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, M. W., Glutting, J. J., & Lei, P. (2007). Validity of the Full-Scale IQ when there is significant variability among WISC-III and WISC-IV factor scores. Applied Neuropsychology, 14(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09084280701280353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, M. W., & Kush, J. C. (1994). Wechsler subtest analysis: The right way, the wrong way, or no way? School Psychology Review, 23(4), 640–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1994.12085739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (4th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2014a). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (5th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2014b). WISC-V technical and interpretive manual (5th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar