Learning from productive failure

References

• Bielaczyc, K., & Kapur, M. (2010). Playing epistemic games in science and mathematics classrooms. Educational Technology. 50(5), 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Capon, N., & Kuhn, D. (2004). What’s so good about problem-based learning? Cognition and Instruction, 22, 61–79.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. (1994). Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 360–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A. (2012). What is the most effective way to teach problem solving? A commentary on productive failure as a method of teaching. Instructional Science, 40(4), 731–735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9234-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCaro, M. S., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2012). Exploring mathematics problems prepares children to learn from instruction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(4), 552–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL?, 61–91.
   Google Scholar
• English, A. R. (2013). Discontinuity in learning: Dewey, Herbart and education as transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gagne, R. M., & Brown, L. T. (1961). Some factors in the programming of conceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 313–321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. J., Kapur, M., So, H-J., & Lee, J. (2011). The ontologies of complexity and learning about complex systems. Instructional Science. 39(5), 763–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 379–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 38(6), 523–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2011). A further study of productive failure in mathematical problem solving: Unpacking the design components. Instructional Science, 39(4), 561–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2012). Productive failure in learning the concept of variance. Instructional Science, 40(4), 651–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2013). Comparing learning from productive failure and vicarious failure. The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 23(4), 651–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2014). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science. 38(5), 1008–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2011). Classroom-based experiments in productive failure. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2812–2817). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 45–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. (2009). Productive failure in CSCL groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 4(1), 21–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2009). The assistance dilemma in CSCL. In A. Dimitracopoulou, C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning practices – CSCL2009 community events proceedings (Vol. 2) (pp. 37–42). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2012). Productive failure in learning and problem solving. Instructional Science, 40(4), 645–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., & Kinzer, C. (2005). Problem solving as a complex, evolutionary activity: A methodological framework for analyzing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment. Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference (pp. 252–261). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., Kinzer, C., & Black, J. (2006). Insights into the emergence of convergence in group discussions. In S. Barab, K. Hay, & D. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on the Learning Sciences (pp. 300–306). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittel, J. E. (1957). An experimental study of the effect of external direction during learning on transfer and retention of principles. Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 391–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15(10), 661–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loibl, K., & Rummel, N. (2013). The impact of guidance during problem-solving prior to instruction on students’ inventions and learning outcomes. Instructional Science. Advance online publication. 42(3), 305–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for achieving transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roll, I., Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. (2011). Outcomes and mechanisms of transfer in invention activities. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2824–2829). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Roll, I., Holmes, N. G., Day, J., & Bonn, D. (2012). Evaluating metacognitive scaffolding in guided invention activities. Instructional Science, 40, 691–710. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9208-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3(4), 207–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., Chase, C. C., Oppezzo, M. A., & Chin, D. B. (2011). Practicing versus inventing with contrasting cases: The effects of telling first on learning and transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 759–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2009). What human cognitive architecture tells us about constructivism. In Tobias S and Duffy T (Ed.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure (pp. 127–143). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1991). Evidence for cognitive load theory. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 351–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (2009). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure. New York, NJ: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Westermann, K., & Rummel, N. (2012). Delaying instruction – evidence from a study in a university relearning setting. Instructional Science, 40(4), 673–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar