Can “less” create “more” in analogical reasoning?

References

• Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56–64). New York, NY: Worth.
   Google Scholar
• Braasch, J., & Goldman, S. (2010). The role of prior knowledge in learning from analogies in science texts. Discourse Processes, 47, 447–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr Jr., V. H. (1999). Technology adoption and diffusion. United States Air Force Air War College Gateway to Internet Resources. Retrieved from http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/innovation/adoptiondiffusion.htm
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., & VanLehn, K. A. (2012). Seeing deep structure from the interactions of surface features. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 177–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, B. R. (2012). Beyond physics: A case for far transfer. Instructional Science, 40, 515–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (1994). Coordinating top-down and bottom-up strategies for educational reform Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/EdReformStudies/SysReforms/fullan1.html
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (2003). Psychology of analogical reasoning. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (pp. 106–112). London: Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Reasoning and learning by analogy. American Psychologist, 52(1), 32–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 393–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., & Toupin, C. (1986). Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science, 10, 277–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2002). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hakel, M. D., & Halpern, D. F. (2005). How far can transfer go? Making transfer happen across physical, temporal, and conceptual space. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. vii–xxvi). Greenwich: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. J., & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory and Cognition, 15(4), 332–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2006, July). Productive failure: A hidden efficacy of seemingly unproductive production. Paper presented at the Cognitive Science Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 379–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2012). Productive failure in learning the concept of variance. Instructional Science, 40(4), 651–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2013). Comparing learning from productive failure and vicarious failure. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 651–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2014). Productive Failure in learning math. Cognitive Science, 38, 1008–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 45–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2012). Productive failure in learning from generation and invention activities. Instructional Science, 40(4), 645–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., & Kinzer, C. K. (2005, May). Problem solving as a complex, evolutionary activity: A methodological framework for analyzing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment. Paper presented at the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference, Taipei, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Kole, J. A., & Healy, A. F. (2007). Using prior knowledge to minimize interference when learning large amounts of information. Memory & Cognition, 35, 124–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz, K. J., Miao, C. -H., & Gentner, D. (2001). Learning by analogical bootstrapping. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(4), 417–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi, C. K., Lim, W. Y., Koh, T. S., & Hung, D. (2005, November). Systemic innovations and the role of change-technology: Issues of sustainability and generalizability. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer in Education, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (2006). Sameness and difference in transfer. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 499–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozzer, N. B., & Justi, R. (2012). Students’ pre- and post- teaching analogical reasoning when they draw their analogies. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 429–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1992). Transfer of learning. In T. N. Postlethwaite & T. Husen (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 11, pp. 6452–6457). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, S. K. (2012). Learning by mapping across situations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(3), 353–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, L. M., & Weisberg, R. W. (1994). The role of content and abstract information in analogical transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 381–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Sander, E., & Richard, J.-F. (2005, July). Analogy and transfer: Encoding the problem at the right level of abstraction. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Schliemann, A. D., & Magalhães, V. P. (1990, July). Proportional reasoning: From shopping to kitchens, laboratories, and, hopefully, schools. Paper presented at the XIV PME Conference, Oaxtepec, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X. D., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. (1999). Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 183–214). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C., & Unger, C. (1997). What’s in dots-per-box? Conceptual bootstrapping with stripped-down visual analogs. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(2), 143–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, J. F. (2006). Transfer in pieces. Cognition and Instruction, 24(1), 1–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbers, J., & Duit, R. (2006). Post-festum and heuristic analogies. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 37–49). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, E. D. (1993). Understanding the generative capacity of analogies as a tool for explanation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1259–1272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar