A socio-cultural perspective to teacher adaptivity: the spreading of curricular innovations in Singapore schools

References

• Achistein, B. (2002). Conflict amid community: The micro politics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 421–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainscow, M., Muijs, D., & West, M. (2006). Collaboration as a strategy for improving schools in challenging circumstances. Improving Schools, 9(3), 192–202.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, S. M., & Koslowski, B. (2002). Adaptive expertise: Effects of type of experience and the level of theoretical understanding it generates. Thinking and Reasoning, 8(4), 237–267.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, M. (1997). Fostering reflective practice in teacher education: Inquiry as a framework for the construction of a professional knowledge in teaching. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 25(2), 111–128.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2009). The elephant in the living room: Or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence. Qualitative Research, 9(2), 139–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., & Giardina, M. D. (2006). Disciplining qualitative research 1. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 769–782.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: Health.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, H., Istance, D., & Benavides, F. (Eds.). (2010). The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Frykholm, J. A. (1998). Beyond supervision: Learning to teach mathematics in community. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 305–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (1997). Cultures of teaching and educational change. In B. Biddle T. Good, & I. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 1297–1319). The Netherlands: Kluwer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development in Japan (pp. 262–272). New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, D. (2014, February 12). Why is Singapore’s school system so successful, and is it a model for the west? Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/why-is-singapores-school-system-so-successful-and-is-it-a-model-for-the-west-22917
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, D., Chan, M., Rahim, R., Kwek, D., Maung Aye, K., Loo, S. C., … & Luo, W. (2013). Assessment and the logic of instructional practice in Secondary 3 English and mathematics classrooms in Singapore. Review of Education, 1(1), 57–106.
   Google Scholar
• Hollins, E. R., McIntyre, L. R., DeBose, C., Hollins, K. S., & Towner, A. (2004). Promoting a self-sustaining learning community: Investigating an internal model for teacher development. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17(2), 247–264.
   Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. (1991). Symbolic connectionism: Toward third-generation theories of expertise. In K. A. Erricssion & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 301–336). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, D., Lee, S. S., & Lim, K. Y. T. (2014). Adaptivities in the Singapore education system: From great to excellent. In D. Hung, K. Y. T. Lim, & S. S. Lee (Eds.), Adaptivity as a transformation disposition for learning in the 21^st century (pp. 247–266). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, D., Lee, S. S., Teh, L. W., Kuan, Y. M., Vishnumahanti, S., & Widiastuti, A. (2014). An ecological perspective on scaling: Balancing structural and individual adaptivities. In D. Hung, K. Y. T. Lim, & S. S. Lee (Eds.), Adaptivity as a transformative disposition for learning in the 21st century (pp. 267–286). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, D., Lee, S. S., & Vishnumahanti, S. (2014). Adaptivities in teacher learning within the context of communities of practice: A school district’s learning journey. In D. Hung, K. Y. T. Lim, & S. S. Lee (Eds.), Adaptivity as a transformation disposition for learning in the 21st century (pp. 137–156). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, D., Shaari, I., Lee, D., & Lee, S. S. (2014). Developing a habitude: When learning isn’t always fun. In D. Hung, K. Y. T. Lim, & S. S. Lee (Eds.), Adaptivity as a transformative disposition for learning in the 21st century (pp. 87–105). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, K. (2010). 21st century skills: Why they matter, what they are, and how we get there. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 2091–2109). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, P. (2006). What is teacher learning? A socio‐cultural perspective. Oxford Review of Education, 32(4), 505–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, M. B. (2002). Professional development to promote schoolwide inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(3), 243–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, E., Hong, H., & Seah, J. (2014). Learner adaptivity: An initial conceptualization. In D. Hung, K. Y. T. Lim, & S. S. Lee (Eds.), Adaptivity as a transformation disposition for learning in the 21^st century (pp. 15–30). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. (2009). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. S., Hung, D., Lim, K. Y. T., & Shaari, I. (2014). Learning adaptivity across contexts. In D. Hung, K. Y. T. Lim, & S.-S. Lee (Eds.), Adaptivity as a transformative disposition for learning in the 21st century (pp. 43–60). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. S., Hung, D., & Teh, L. W. (in-press). An ecological view of conceptualizing change in the Singapore Education System. Education Research for Policy and Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, E., & Price-Rom, A. (2006). Quality of education and teacher learning: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: USAID.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, B. B., Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., Seers, A., Orton, J. D, & Schreiber, C. (2006). Complexity leadership theory: An interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8(4), 2–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2005). Socially just pedagogies in changing times. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 15, 165–186.
   Google Scholar
• Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995). Qualitative research: Rigour and qualitative research. Bmj, 311(6997), 109–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. (1995). What can you tell from an N ofl?: Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 4, 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2008). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). Education: How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. London: McKinsey.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership—improvement through empowerment? An overview of the literature. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 31(4), 437–448.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., West, M., & Ainscow, M. (2010). Why network? Theoretical perspectives on networking. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(1), 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulford, B. (2003). School leaders: Challenging roles and impact on teacher and school effectiveness. OECD commissioned paper.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T., & Slavit, D. (2008). Supported teacher collaborative inquiry. Teacher Education Quarterly, 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Lesson from PISA for the United States, strong performers and successful reformers in education. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. (2005). Making the most of the curriculum review: Some reflections on supporting and sustaining change in schools. Scottish Educational Review, 37(1), 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Riel, M., & Vahey, P. (2005, April). Characterizing adaptive expertise in science teaching. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., & Eatough, V. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In E. Lyons & A. Coyle (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology (pp. 35–50). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Soslau, E. (2012). Opportunities to develop adaptive teaching expertise during supervisory conferences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 768–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teh, L. W. (2014). Singapore’s performance in PISA: Levelling up the long tail. In Educational policy innovations (pp. 71-–83). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. (2011). A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6), 511-–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2011). A background paper to inform the development of a national professional development framework for teachers and school leaders. Melbourne: AITSL.
   Google Scholar
• Toh, Y., Jamaludin, A., Hung, W. L. D., & Chua, P. M. H. (2014). Ecological leadership: Going beyond system leadership for diffusing school-based innovations in the crucible of change for 21st century learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(4), 835–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competencies: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1979). Consciousness as a problem in the psychology of behaviour. Soviet Psychology, 17(4), 3–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 702–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998a). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998b). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whittemore, R., Chase, S. K., & Mandle, C. L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yue, C. S. (2001). Singapore: Towards a knowledge-based economy. In S. Masuyama, D. Vandenbrink, & C. S. Yue (Eds.), Industrial restructuring in East Asia – towards the 21^st century (pp. 169–208). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar