Learning is the key twenty-first century skill

References

• Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonawitz, E., & Lombrozo, T. (2012). Occam’s rattle: Children’s use of simplicity and probability to constrain inference. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1156–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonawitz, E. B., van Schijndel, T., Friel, D., & Schulz, L. (2012). Balancing theories and evidence in children’s exploration, explanations, and learning. Cognitive Psychology, 64, 215–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, M. (2014). Human infancy … and the rest of the lifespan. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 121–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buresh, J. S., & Woodward, A. L. (2007). Infants track action goals within and across agents. Cognition, 104, 287–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. (2006). The microgenetic method: Current work and extensions to classroom research. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• CLA in the Classroom. (2014). Architecture of the CLA tasks. Retrieved from http://www.claintheclassroom.org
   Google Scholar
• College and Work Readiness Assessment (CWRA). (2010). Institutional report and appendices. Retrieved from http://www.cae.org/content/procollegework.htm
   Google Scholar
• Danner, D., Hagemann, D., Schankin, A., Hager, M., & Funke, J. (2011). Beyond IQ: A latent state-trait analysis of general intelligence, dynamic decision making, and implicit learning. Intelligence, 39, 323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. (2014, February 22). How to get a job at Google. [Reporting on an interview with Laszlo Bock, vice president of people operations at Google Inc.]. The New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J., & Yu, S. (2014). Modeling and measuring epistemic cognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 12–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiff, S., Wüstenberg, S., Molnár, G., Fischer, A., Funke, J., & Csapó, B. (2013). Complex problem solving in educational contexts—something beyond g: Concept, assessment, measurement invariance, and construct validity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 364–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh, R. (2005, November). What does college teach? Atlantic Monthly, pp. 140–143.
   Google Scholar
• Jarms, M., Zayas, V., Meltzoff, A., & Carlson, S. (2014). Stability of executive function and predictions to adaptive behavior from middle childhood to pre-adolescence. Frontiers in Psychology. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewett, E., & Kuhn, D. (2016). Social science as a tool in developing scientific thinking skills in underserved, low-achieving urban students. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 143, 154–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1995). Microgenetic study of change: What has it told us? Psychological Science, 6, 133–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2012). The development of causal reasoning. WIREs Cognitive Science. doi:10.1002/wcs.1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2016). What do young science students need to learn about variables? Science Education, 100 (2), 392–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keselman, A., & Kaplan, D. (2000). The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 495–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2005). Is developing scientific thinking all about learning to control variables? Psychological Science, 16, 866–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2008). Scaffolded development of inquiry skills in academically-disadvantaged middle-school students. Journal of the Psychology of Science and Technology, 1, 36–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Garcia-Mila, M., Zohar, A., & Andersen, C. (1995). Strategies of knowledge acquisition. [With commentaries by Sheldon White, David Klahr & Sharon Carver]. Society for Research in Child Development Monographs, 60(4), Serial no. 245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., & Khait, V. (2016). Argue with me: Argument as a path to developing students’ thinking and writing (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Katz, J. (2009). Are self-explanations always beneficial? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 386–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Pease, M. (2006). Do children and adults learn differently? Journal of Cognition and Development, 7, 279–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Pease, M. (2008). What needs to develop in the development of inquiry skills? Cognition and Instruction, 26, 512–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Pease, M. (2009). The dual components of developing strategy use: Production and inhibition. In H. S. Waters & W. Schneider (Eds.), Metacognition, strategy use, and instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Pease, M., & Wirkala, C. (2009). Coordinating effects of multiple variables: A skill fundamental to causal and scientific reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 268–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Phelps, E. (1982). The development of problem-solving strategies. In H. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 17). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Ramsey, S., & Arvidsson, T. S. (2015). Developing multivariable thinkers. Cognitive Development, 35, 92–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Schauble, L., & Garcia-Mila, M. (1992). Cross-domain development of scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 285–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushnir, T., Xu, F., & Wellman, H. (2010). Young children use statistical sampling to infer the preferences of others. Psychological Science, 21, 1134–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazonder, A., & Kamp, E. (2012). Bit by bit or all at once? Splitting up the inquiry task to promote children’ scientific reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 22, 458–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legare, C. (2012). Exploring explanation: Explaining inconsistent evidence informs exploratory, hypothesis-testing behavior in young children. Child Development, 83, 173–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legare, C. (2014). The contributions of explanation and exploration to children’s scientific reasoning. Child Development Perspectives. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., & Lucas, D. (2008). Supporting development of the epistemology of inquiry. Cognitive Development, 23, 512–529. [Special issue, The Development of Scientific Thinking, B. Sodian & M. Bullock, Eds.]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElhaney, K., & Linn, M. (2011). Investigations of a complex, realistic task: Intentional, unsystematic and exhaustive experimenters. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 745–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C. (2011). Knowing when to doubt: Developing a critical stance when learning from others. Developmental Psychology, 49, 404–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshman, D. (2011). Adolescent rationality and development: Cognition, morality, identity (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moshman, D. (2015). Epistemic cognition and development: The psychology of justification and truth. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, Y., Lazonder, A., & deJong, T. (2011). Comparing two types of model progression in an inquiry learning environment with modelling facilities. Learning and Instruction, 21, 614–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Education Association. (2014). An educator’s guide to the “ Four Cs.” Retrieved from www.nea.org/tools/52217.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R., Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Halpern, D., & Turkheimer, E. (2012). Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. American Psychologist, 67, 130–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., ...Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, L. (2012). The origins of inquiry: Inductive inference and exploration in early childhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 382–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. (1994). Cognitive variability: A key to understanding cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. (2006). Microgenetic studies of learning. In W. Damon & R. Lerner ( Series Eds.) & D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46(6), 606–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K., & West, R. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 342–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand-Cary, M., & Klahr, D. (2008). Developing elementary science skills; Instructional effectiveness and path independence. Cognitive Development, 23, 488–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vouloumanos, A., & Werker, J. F. (2009). Infants’ learning of novel words in a stochastic environment. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1611–1617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, P., & Beishuizen, J. (2003). Content effects in self-directed inductive learning. Learning and Instruction, 13, 381–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar