The logic of design research

References

• American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41, 16–25. doi:10.3102/0013189X11428813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bannan, B. (2007). The integrative learning design framework: An illustrated example from the domain of instructional technology. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research (pp. 53–73). Enschede, Netherlands: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32, 21–24. doi:10.3102/0013189X032001021
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Introduction: Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 1–14. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman, S. L., & Barry, M. (2007). Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking. California Management Review, 50(1), 25–56. doi:10.2307/41166415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. doi:10.2307/1511637
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (2001a). Design and the new rhetoric: Productive arts in the philosophy of culture. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 34, 183–206. doi:10.1353/par.2001.0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (2001b). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3–23. doi:10.1162/07479360152681056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, S. M. (2006). Assessing for deep understanding. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 205–221). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christian, B. (2012, April 25). The A/B test: Inside the technology that’s changing the rules of business. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/2012/04/ff_abtesting/
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D. L, & Guba, E. (1965). An examination of potential change roles in education. Washington, DC: National Education Association. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED043226
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M., & Packer, M. (2016). Design-Based intervention research as the science of the doubly artificial. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 503–530. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1187148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 15–42. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., Reimann, R., & Cronin, D. (2007). About face 3.0: The essentials of interaction design. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2004). If design-based research is the answer. What is the question? A commentary on Collins, Joseph, And Bielaczyc; Disessa And Cobb; And Fishman, Marx, Blumenthal, Krajcik, And Soloway in the JLS special issue on design-based research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 105-114.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2014). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A., & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 77–103. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterday, M. W., Rees Lewis, D., & Gerber, E. M. (2016b). Designing crowdcritique systems for formative feedback. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26. doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0125-9
   Google Scholar
• Easterday, M. W., Rees Lewis, D. G., & Gerber, E. M. (2016a). The logic of the theoretical and practical products of design research. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 125–144. doi:10.14742/ajet.2464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 105–121. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design patterns: Elements of reusable object-oriented software. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., & Jurow, A. S. (2016). Social design experiments: Toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 565–598. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.120454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoadley, C. M. (2004). Methodological alignment in design-based research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 203–212. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3904_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 115–128. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. E. (2003). Theme issue: The role of design in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 3–4. doi:10.3102/0013189X032001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A., & Baek, J. Y. (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. E. (2006). Quality criteria for design research: Evidence and commitments. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 107–118). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D. (1995). A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 608–630. doi:10.2307/748192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2003). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maurya, A. (2016). Scaling lean: Mastering the key metrics for startup growth. New York, NY: Portfolio /Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.3102/0013189X12463781
   Google Scholar
• McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2013). Systematic review of design-based research progress is a little knowledge a dangerous thing? Educational Researcher, 42, 97–100. doi:10.3102/0013189X12463781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, D. K. (2012). Designs that fly: What the history of aeronautics tells us about the future of design-based research in education. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 35, 119–140. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2012.683573
   Google Scholar
• Parnes, S. J. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. New York, NY: Scribner. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00027.x
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Haugan Cheng, B., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40, 331–337. doi:10.3102/0013189X11421826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2007). An introduction to educational design research. Enschede, Netherlands: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmusson, J. (2010). The agile samurai: How agile masters deliver great software (pragmatic programmers). Frisco, TX: Pragmatic Bookshelf.
   Google Scholar
• Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Nelson, W. A. (2004). Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 1099–1130). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A. (2014). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 18–36. doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.778204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39, 199–201. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3904_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino, A., Engeström, Y., & Lemos, M. (2016). Formative interventions for expansive learning and transformative agency. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 599–633. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1204547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K. R. (2014). Introduction: The new science of learning. In K. R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 2nd ed. (1–18). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139519526.002
   Google Scholar
• Severance, S., Penuel, W. R., Sumner, T., & Leary, H. (2016). Organizing for teacher agency in curricular co-design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 531–564. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1207541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, J., & Robertson, T. (Eds.). (2013). Routledge international handbook of participatory design. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, D. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and conducting formative evaluations: Improving the quality of education and training. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. (August 21, 2007). Halo 3: How Microsoft Labs invented a new science of play. Wired Magazine, 15(9).  Retrieved from: http://archive.wired.com/gaming/virtualworlds/magazine/15-09/ff_halo?currentPage=all
   Google Scholar
• van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7
   Google Scholar
• van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2012). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In CHI 07ʹ proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 493–502). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/1240624.1240704. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1240624&picked=prox
   Google Scholar