309
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Space-time in the study of learning trajectories

ORCID Icon
Pages 36-53 | Received 17 Oct 2019, Accepted 22 Jul 2020, Published online: 15 Oct 2020

References

  • Arnseth, H., & Silseth, K. (2013). Tracing learning and identity across sites: Tensions, connections and transformations in and between everyday and institutional practices. Identity, Community, and Learning Lives in the Digital Age, 23–38.
  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press.
  • Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49, 93–224. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094368 4
  • Barron, B., Wise, S., & Martin, C. K. (2013). Creating within and across life spaces: The role of a computer clubhouse in a child’s learning ecology. In B. Bevan, P. Bell, R. Stevens, & A. Razfar (Eds.), LOST opportunities (pp. 99–118). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4304-5_8
  • Beach, K. (1999). Chapter 4: Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 24(1),101–139. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X024001101
  • Bell, P., Bricker, L., Reeve, S., Zimmerman, H. T., & Tzou, C. (2013). Discovering and supporting successful learning pathways of youth in and out of school: Accounting for the development of everyday expertise across settings. In B. Bevan, P. Bell, R. Stevens, & A. Razfar (Eds.), LOST Opportunities (pp. 119–140). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4304-5_9
  • *Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545
  • Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning (Vol. 3). Harvard University Press.
  • Chaiklin, S. (2001). Comprensión de la práctica científico-social. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Estudiar las prácticas. Perspectivas sobre actividad y contexto (pp. 403–427). Amorrortu.
  • Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University Press.
  • Coll, C. (1989). Conocimiento psicológico y práctica educactiva: Introducción a las relaciones entre psicología y educación. Barcanova.
  • Coll, C. (2013). El currículo escolar en el marco de la nueva ecología del aprendizaje. Aula de innovación educativa, ISSN 1131-995X, Nº 219, 2013, págs. 31-36
  • Coll, C. (2018). La personalización del aprendizaje escolar. Graó.
  • Dreier, O. (1999). Personal Trajectories of Participation across Contexts of Social Practice. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 1(1), 5-32. Retrieved from https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/article/view/3841
  • Edwards, A., & Mackenzie, L. (2005). Steps towards participation: The social support of learning trajectories. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 24(4), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370500169178
  • Engel, A., Fauré, J., Membrive, A., Merino, I., & Coll, C. (2019). The influence of parents in the discursive construction of technology-mediated learning experiences. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26 (4),323–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1685549
  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation, In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen & R-l. Punamaki (Eds) Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
  • Erstad, O., Kumpulainen, K., Mäkitalo, Å., Schrøder, K. C., Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P., & Jóhannsdóttir, T. (Eds.). (2016). Learning across contexts in the knowledge society. Springer.
  • *Erstad, O., Gilje, E., & Arnseth, H. C. (2013). Learning lives connected: Digital youth across school and community spaces. Comunicar, 20(40), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.3916/C40-2013-02-09
  • Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., Schor, J., Sefton-Green, J., & Watkins, S. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. BookBaby.
  • Jarvis, P. (1987). Meaningful and meaningless experience: Towards an analysis of learning from life. Adult Education Quarterly, 37(3), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848187037003004
  • *Kerawalla, L., Littleton, K., Scanlon, E., Jones, A., Gaved, M., Collins, T., Mulholland, P., Blake, C., Clough, G., Conole, G., & Petrou, M. (2013). Personal inquiry learning trajectories in geography: Technological support across contexts. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(6), 497–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.604036
  • Kozulin, A. (2003). Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kumpulainen, K., & Sefton-Green, J. (2014). What is connected learning and how to research it? International Journal of Learning and Media, 4(2), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1162/IJLM_a_00091
  • Lave, J., & Chaiklin, S. (Eds.). (1993). Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives). Cambridge University Press.
  • Leander, K., & McKim, K. (2003). Tracing the everyday ‘sitings’ of adolescents on the internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 211–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636310303140
  • Leander, K., Phillips, N., & Taylor, K. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09358129
  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (Vol. 142). Oxford.
  • Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Actividad, consciencia y personalidad. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
  • Leontiev, A. N. (1981). Actividad. Conciencia. Personalidad. Editorial Pueblo y Educación.
  • Ligorio, M. (2009). Identity as a product of knowledge building: the role of mediated dialogue. Qwerty - Open and Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and Education, 4, 33-46.
  • *Ligorio, M., Feldia, F., & Sansone, N. (2013). Dialogical positions as a method of understanding identity trajectories in a collaborative blended university course. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(3), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9174-3
  • Livingstone, S., & Sefton-Green, J. (2016). The class: Living and learning in the digital age. NYU Press.
  • Ludvigsen, S., Rasmussen, I., Krange, I., Moen, A., & Middleton, D. (2011). Intersecting trajectories of participation. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, & R. Säljö (Eds.). Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (105–121). Routledge.
  • Luria, A. (1928). The problem of the cultural development of the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 35, 493–506.
  • Luria, A. R. (1932). The nature of human conflicts. Liveright.
  • Owen, C., Barnard, A., & Bestic, J. (2013). Learning trajectories in longitudinal rural medical school placements. The Clinical Teacher, 10(6), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12053
  • Ritella, G., & Ligorio, M. B. (2016). Investigating chronotopes to advance a dialogical theory of collaborative sensemaking. Culture & Psychology, 22(2), 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X15621475
  • Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp.139–165). Cambridge University Press.
  • Rosa, A., & Valsiner, J. (2018). The Human Psyche Lives in Semiospheres. In A. Rosa, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (2 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 13-34). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662229.002
  • *Roth, S., & Erstad, O. (2016). Positional identities in educational transitions: Connecting contemporary and future trajectories among multiethnic girls. Ethnography and Education, 11(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2015.1040044
  • Schegloff, E. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society 8(2),165–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008002002
  • Sefton-Green, J. (2017). Representing learning lives: What does it mean to map learning journeys? International Journal of Educational Research, 84, 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.05.003
  • *Silseth, K. (2012). The multivoicedness of game play: Exploring the unfolding of a student’s learning trajectory in a gaming context at school. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9132-x
  • Strauss, A. L. (1975). Chronic illness and the quality of life. C.V. Mosby.
  • Swist, T., & Kuswara, A. (2016). Place-making in higher education: Co-creating engagement and knowledge practices in the networked age. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1128887
  • Veresov, N. (2017). The concept of perezhivanie in cultural-historical theory: Content and contexts. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 12(3), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2016120308
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1960). Razvitie vysshikh psikhicheskikh funktsii [Development of the higher mental functions]. APN.
  • Vygotsky, L.S. & Luria, A.R. (1930) The Function and Fate of Egocentric Speech, in Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Psychology, New Haven, 1929. Princeton: Psychological Review
  • Walker, M. P., & Van Der Helm, E. (2009). Overnight therapy? The role of sleep in emotional brain processing. Psychological Bulletin, 135(5), 731. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016570
  • *Wiig, C., Silseth, K., & Erstad, O. (2018). Creating intercontextuality in students learning trajectories. Opportunities and Difficulties, Language and Education 32(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2017.1367799
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1995). The need for action in sociocultural research. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 56-74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.