446
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Report

Engagement and compliance in education today

ORCID Icon
Pages 139-147 | Received 01 Sep 2021, Accepted 26 May 2022, Published online: 20 Jun 2022

References

  • Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Morizot, J., & Pagani, L. (2009). Adolescent behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement in school: Relationship to dropout. Journal of School Health, 79(9), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00428.x
  • Archambault, I., & Dupéré, V. (2017). Joint trajectories of behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement in elementary school. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(2), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1060931
  • Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviors predicting students‘ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158883
  • Chen, J., Huebner, E., & Tian, L. (2020). Longitudinal relations between hope and academic achievement in elementary school students: Behavioral engagement as a mediator. Learning and Individual Differences, 78, 101824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101824
  • Danley, A., & Williams, C. (2020). Choice in learning: Differentiating instruction in the college classroom. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 15, 83–104. https://doi.org/10.46504/15202005da
  • Engels, M., Colpin, H., Van Leeuwen, K., Bijttebier, P., Van Den Noortgate, P., Claes, S., Goossens, L., & Verschueren, K. (2016). Behavioral engagement, peer status, and teacher-student relationships in adolescence: A longitudinal study on reciprocal influences. Journal of Youth Adolescence. 45(6), 1192–1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0414-5
  • Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
  • Fredricks, J., McColskey, W., Meli, J., Mordica, J., Montrosse, B., & Mooney, K. (2011). Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: A description of 21 instruments. Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast at SERVE CenterUNC. 098.
  • Fredricks, J. (2014). Eight Myths of Student Disengagement. Corwin.
  • Fredricks, J., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
  • Garrett, T. (2014). Effective classroom management: The essentials. Teachers College Press.
  • Hart, S., Stewart, K., & Jimerson, S. (2011). The student engagement in schools questionnaire (SESQ) and the teacher engagement report form-new (TERF-N): Examining the preliminary evidence. Contemporary School Psychology, 15, 67–79.
  • Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682
  • Lawson, M. (2017). Commentary: Bridging student engagement research and practice. School Psychology International, 38(3), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034317708010
  • Lee, J. (2014). The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is it a myth or reality? The Journal of Educational Research, 107(3), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.807491
  • Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001153
  • Nguyen, T., Cannata, M., & Miller, J. (2018). Understanding student behavioral engagement: Importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1220359
  • Poltavski, D., Van Eck, R., Winger, A., & Honts, C. (2018). Using a polygraph system for evaluation of the social desirability response bias in self-report measures of aggression. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 43(4), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-018-9414-4
  • Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschley, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer Science+Business Media.
  • Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690
  • Saeedi, Z., Ghorbani, N., Sarafraz, M., & Shoar, T. (2020). A bias of self-reports among repressors: Examining the evidence for the validity of self-relevant and health-relevant personal reports. International Journal of Psychology, 55(1), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12560
  • Skinner, E., & Pitzer, J. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschley, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer Science+Business Media.
  • Smith, R., & Dearborn, G. (2016). Conscious classroom management: Unlocking the secrets of great teaching (Conscious Teaching LLC).
  • song, G., Ma, Q., Wu, F., & Li, L. (2012). The psychological explanation of conformity. Social Behavior and Personality, 40(8), 1365–1372. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2012.40.8.1365
  • Suárez, N., Regueiro, B., Estévez, I., Ferradás, M., Guisande, M., & Rodríguez, S. (2019). Individual precursors of student homework behavioral engagement: The role of intrinsic motivation, perceived homework utility and homework attitude. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00941
  • Virtanen, T., Lerkkanen, M., Poikkeus, A., & Kuorelahti, M. (2014). Student behavioral engagement as a mediator between teacher, family, and peer support and school truancy. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.09.001
  • Wang, M., & Fredricks, J. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85(2), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12138
  • Wang, M., & Degol, J. (2014). Staying engaged: Knowledge and research needs in student engagement. Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12073

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.