Guidance differs between teaching modes: practical challenges in integrating hands-on investigations with direct instruction

References

• Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunstein, A., Betts, S., & Anderson, J. R. (2009). Practice enables successful learning under minimal guidance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 790–802. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2011). Theoretical perspectives, methodological approaches, and trends in the study of expertise. In Y. Li & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Expertise in mathematics instruction: An international perspective (pp. 17–40). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, M., & Schaverien, L. (1996). Children’s conversations and learning science and technology. International Journal of Science Education, 18(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean Jr, D., & Kuhn, D. (2007). Direct instruction vs. discovery: The long view. Science Education, 91(3), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M. (2006). The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Science Education, 90(3), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier, H. E., Lemmens, M., Druker, S. L., & Roth, K. J. (2011). Third International mathematics and science study 1999 video study technical report volume 2: Science. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A. (1996). The scientist as child. Philosophy of Science, 63(4), 485–514. https://doi.org/10.1086/289970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J., Garnier, H., Gallimore, R., Hollingsworth, H., Givvin, K. B., Rust, K., and Stigler, J. (2003). Third International mathematics and science study 1999 video study technical report volume I: Mathematics. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 379–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802212669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science Volume, 38(6), 523–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9093-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 45–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.591717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind, P. M., Kind, V., Hofstein, A., & Wilson, J. (2011). Peer argumentation in the school science laboratory - exploring effects of task features. International Journal of Science Education, 33(18), 2527–2558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.550952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klahr, D., Fay, A. L., & Dunbar, K. (1993). Heuristics for scientific experimentation: A developmental study. Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 111–146. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2007). Is direct instruction an answer to the right question? Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. S., & Anderson, J. R. (2013). Student learning: What has instruction got to do with it? Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 445–469. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143833
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matlen, B. J., & Klahr, D. (2013). Sequential effects of high and low instructional guidance on children’s acquisition of experimentation skills: Is it all in the timing? Instructional Science, 41(3), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9248-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.59.1.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Constructivism as a theory of learning versus constructivism as a prescription for instruction. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 184–200). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., & Driver, R. (1987). Beyond processes. Studies in Science Education, 14(1), 33–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268708559938
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (2004). The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science. Paper prepared for the committee on high school science laboratories: Role and vision, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction - what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92(3), 289–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: Effects of self-explanation and direct instruction. Child Development, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00852.x
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2006). The new science of learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 1–16). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M. M., Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2007). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475–522. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1604_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Clark, R. E. (2007). Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: A reply to commentaries. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (Eds.). (2009). The success or failure of constructivist instruction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., & Prain, V. (2021). How should we teach science and maths?. The Age. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/how-should-we-teach-science-and-maths-20211028-p59413.html
   Google Scholar
• Waight, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2007). The impact of technology on the enactment of “Inquiry” in a technology enthusiast’s sixth grade science slassroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 154–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20158
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. J. (1981). “What’s supposed to happen, sir?”: Some problems with discovery learning. School Science Review, 63(222): 167–173.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A. F., & O’Neill, K. (2009). Beyond more versus less: A reframing of the debate on instructional guidance. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 82–105). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. (2016). Is inquiry-based science teaching worth the effort? Some thoughts worth considering. Science & Education, 25(7), 897–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9856-0
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. (2018). Withholding answers during hands-on scientific investigations? Comparing effects on developing students’ scientific knowledge, reasoning, and application. International Journal of Science Education, 40(4), 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1429692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. (2019). “Hands-on” plus “inquiry”? Effects of withholding answers coupled with physical manipulations on students’ learning of energy-related science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 60, 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., & Cobern, W. W. (2021). Confusions on “Guidance” in inquiry-based science teaching: A response to Aditomo and Klieme (2020). Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 21(1), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00116-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Kirschner, P. A., Cobern, W. W., & Sweller, J. (2022). There is an evidence crisis in science educational policy. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 1157–1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09646-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar