Principles of assessment in school-based making

References

• Bergner, Y., Abramovich, S., Worsley, M., & Chen, O. (2019). What are the learning and assessment objectives in educational fab labs and makerspaces?. In Proceedings of FabLearn 2019. (pp. 42–49).
   Google Scholar
• Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and ‘Making’ in education: The democratization of invention. In J. Walter-Herrmann, C. Büching, J. Walter-Herrmann, & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLab: Of machines, makers, and inventors (pp. 203–222). Transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839423820.203
   Google Scholar
• Blikstein, P. (2018 Maker movement in education: History and prospect de Vries, M. J.). . Handbook of Technology Education (Springer International Publishing), 419–437 978-3-319-44687-5 .
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W., & Fuchs, B. (2006). Preparing the 21st century workforce: A new reform in science and technology education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 349–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, M. (2020, April). Towards student-driven formative assessment practices across school and afterschool makerspaces. In Proceedings of the FabLearn 2020-9th Annual Conference On Maker Education (pp. 122–125).
   Google Scholar
• Chang, S., Keune, A., Peppler, K., Maltese, A., McKay, C., & Regalla, L. (2015). Open portfolios: Maker education initiative full research brief series (Phase 1). MakerEd.
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, E. P., Ross, J., Ryan, J. O., & Tishman, S. (2016). Maker-centered learning: Empowering young people to shape their worlds. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In Canlon, E, & O'Shea T (Eds.,), New directions in educational technology 96, Computer and Systems Sciences (Springer-Verlag) (pp. 15–22).
   Google Scholar
• Davey, T., Ferrara, S., Shavelson, R., Holland, P., Webb, N., & Wise, L. (2015). In Psychometric Considerations for the Next Generation of Performance Assessment. Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Dorn, C. M., Sabol, R., & Madeja, S. S. (2004). Assessing Expressive Learning: A Practical Guide for Teacher-directed Authentic Assessment in K-12 Visual Arts Education (‎Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. (2013). The maker mindset. In M. Honey & D. E. Kanter (Eds.), Design, make, play (pp. 25–29). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44(4), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15584327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falloon, G., Forbes, A., Stevenson, M., Bower, M., & Hatzigianni, M. (2020). STEM in the making? Investigating STEM learning in junior school makerspaces. Research in Science Education 52, 511–537. https://org.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/10.1007/s11165-020-09949-3 .
   Google Scholar
• Fields, R. (2014). Towards the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) as an indicator of academic preparedness for college and job training. National Assessment Governing Board.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, G., & Fyfe, B. 1998. Negotiated learning through design, documentation and discourse. In Edwards, C, Gandini, L, Forman, G. (Eds.,),The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood education, 2nd. Ablex Publishing (pp.239–260). ISBN: 1-56750-310-1.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. (2005). . The world is flat: A brief history of the globalised world in the 21st century. London: Allen Lane-Penguin Books: 9780374292881.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, K. K., Yang, M. C., & Wood, K. L. (2015, August). Design principles: The foundation of design. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences And Computers And Information In Engineering Conference (Vol. 57175, p. V007T06A034). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Fyfe, B. (2012). The Hundred Languages of Children: The Reggio Emilia Experience in Transformation, 3, 273–291. ISBN: 0313359814 .
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1989). Zero-based art education. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 30(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320774
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, D. D., & Hobbs, J. A. Historical analysis of assessment in art education. (2002). Art Education, 55(6), 12–17. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.2307/3193974
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. J., Murai, Y., & Chang, S. (2020). Embedded assessment tools for maker classrooms: A design-based research approach M. Gresalfi & I. S. Horn, Eds. International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS). https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/6345
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., Millerjohn, R., & Wardrip, P. (2019). Designing tools for observation and assessment in makerspaces. In Proceedings of FabLearn 2019 (pp. 197–200).
   Google Scholar
• Lille, B., & Romero, M. (2017). Creativity assessment in the context of maker-based projects. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 22(3), 32–47. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1164267.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Q., Yin, Y., Tang, X., Hadad, R., & Zhai, X. (2020). Assessing learning in technology-rich maker activities: A systematic review of empirical research. Computers & Education, 157, 103944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1099
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn. Making, Tinkering, and Engineering in the Classroom. Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
   Google Scholar
• Millett, C. M., Payne, D. G., Dwyer, C. A., Stickler, L. M., & Alexiou, J. J. (2008). In A Culture of Evidence: An Evidence-Centered Approach to Accountability for Student Learning Outcomes, Educational Testing Service. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED499994
   Google Scholar
• Mislevy, R. J., & Haertel, G. D. (2007). Implications of evidence-centered design for educational testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(4), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2006.00075.x
   Google Scholar
• Murai, Y., Kim, Y. J., Martin, E., Kirschmann, P., Rosenheck, L., & Reich, J. (2019). Embedding assessment in school-based making: preliminary exploration of principles for embedded assessment in maker learning FabLearn '19, 2019, 180–183. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311890.3311922
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of flow. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology 2nd (pp. 239–263). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Peppler, K., Halverson, E., & Kafai, Y. B. (2016). Makeology: Makerspaces as learning environments (volume 1). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peppler, K., & Keune, A. (2019). “It helps create and enhance a community”: Youth motivations for making portfolios. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(3), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1647546
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, H., & Bell, P. (2013). How designing, making, and playing relate to the learning goals of K-12 science education. In M. Honey & M. Honey (Eds.), Design, make, play: growing the next generation of STEM innovators. Routledge, 35–51 .
   Google Scholar
• Rompelman, O. (2000). Assessment of student learning: Evolution of objectives in engineering education and the consequences for assessment. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(4), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790050200386
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A., Penuel, W. R., & Davidson, K. L. (2017). Design principles for new systems of assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(6), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717696478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, K., Halverson, E. R., Litts, B., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505–531. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.brr34733723j648u
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soster, T., Fuhrmann, T., & Campos, F. (2020). Mapping assessment practices in school makerspaces. In A. Sipitakiat & N. Tutiyaphuengprasert (Eds.), Proceedings of FabLearn Asia 2020 (p. 6). Suksapattana Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R., & Chappuis, J. (2005). Using student-involved classroom assessment to close achievement gaps. Theory into Practice, 44(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4401_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardrip, P. S., & Brahms, L. (2015). Learning practices of making: Developing a framework for design. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference On Interaction Design And Children, 375–378.
   Google Scholar
• Wardrip, P., Evancho, J., & McNamara, A. (2018). Identifying what matters. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(6), 60–63.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, S., Lande, M., & Jordan, S. S. (2018). What have we “learned” from maker education research? A learning sciences-base review of ASEE literature on the maker movement. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Salt Lake City, UT. 23963.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). What is backward design. In Understanding by design (2nd ed., pp. 7–19). association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., & Sloane, K. (2000). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13(2), 181–208. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1302_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar