On Art and Experimentation as Geographical Practice

REFERENCES

• Agarwal, G., I. H. Stevenson, A. Berenyi, K. Mizuseki, G. Buzsáki, and F. T. Sommer. 2014. Spatially distributed local fields in the hippocampus encode rat position. Science 344 (6184):626–30. doi:10.1126/science.1250444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. 2019. Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bley, K., K. Caldwell, M. Kelly, J. Loyd, R. E. Roth, T. M. Anderson, A. Bonds, J. Plevin, D. Madison, C. Spencer, et al. 2021. A design challenge for transforming justice. GeoHumanities 8 (1):344–65. doi:10.1080/2373566X.2021.1986100.
   Google Scholar
• Bosse, A. 2021. Collaborative cartography. In The geographic information science & technology body of knowledge, ed. John P. Wilson, 3rd quarter 2021 ed. Chesapeake, VA: UCGIS. doi:10.22224/gistbok/2021.3.2.
   Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, N. 2002. Relational aesthetics. Les Presses du réel.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B., and S. Whatmore. 2010. Political matter: Technoscience, democracy, and public life. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza-Chock, S. 2020. Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, A., J. Tyner, J. Ajayakumar, S. Kimsroy, and K.-C. Ly. 2019. Adding spatial context to the April 17, 1975 evacuation of Phnom Penh: How spatial video geonarratives can geographically enrich genocide testimony. GeoHumanities 5 (2):386–404. doi:10.1080/2373566X.2019.1624186.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ignazio, C., and L. F. Klein. 2020. Data feminism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, J. 2009. SpecLab: Digital aesthetics and projects in speculative computing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, J. 2020. Visualization and interpretation: Humanistic approaches to display. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. 2006. Critical issues in participatory GIS: Deconstructions, reconstructions, and new research directions. Transactions in GIS 10 (5):693–708. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01023.x.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., and M. Wilson. 2017. Critical GIS pedagogies beyond “Week 10: Ethics.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 31 (10):2098–116. doi:10.1080/13658816.2017.1334892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. 2013. Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation. In Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in theory and practice, ed. D. Sui, S. Elwood, and M. Goodchild. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, H. 2011. Dialogues and doings: Sketching the relationships between geography and art. Geography Compass 5 (7):464–78. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00429.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, H. 2013. Geography and art. An expanding field: Site, the body and practice. Progress in Human Geography 37 (1):52–71. doi:10.1177/0309132512442865.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, H. 2014. For creative geographies: Geography, visual arts and the making of worlds. New York; NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, H. 2015. Creative geographic methods: Knowing, representing, intervening. On composing place and page. Cultural Geographies 22 (2):247–68. doi:10.1177/1474474015569995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, B. 2009. Escape the overcode: Activist art in the control society. Eindhoven, Netherlands: Van Abbemuseum.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, B. J. 2017. Digitize and punish: Computerized crime mapping and racialized carceral power in Chicago. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35 (5):775–96. doi:10.1177/0263775817697703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, C. 1994. Playing the field: Questions of feminist fieldwork. The Professional Geographer 46 (1):67–72. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00067.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. 2016. Collectively mapping borders. Cartographic Perspectives 84:31–8. doi:10.14714/CP84.1363.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. 2019. Mapping Syrian Refugee border crossings: A feminist approach. Cartographic Perspectives 93:34–64. doi:10.14714/CP93.1406.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. 2021. Mapping bodies, designing feminist icons. GeoHumanities 7 (2):529–57. doi:10.1080/2373566X.2021.1883455.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. Forthcoming. Feminist geography and geospatial technology. In The Routledge handbook of geospatial technologies and society, ed. A. Kent and D. Specht. Boca Raton, FL: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M., and A. Bosse. 2022. Pressing pause, “doing” feminist mapping. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 21 (4):399–415.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., J. Gleeson, and M. Dodge. 2013. Unfolding mapping practices: A new epistemology for cartography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38 (3):480–96. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00540.x.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, A. K. 2000. A case for teaching geographic visualization without GIS. Cartographic Perspectives 36:23–37. doi:10.14714/CP36.823.
   Google Scholar
• Lally, N. 2022a. Sculpting, cutting, expanding, and contracting the map. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 57 (1):1–10. doi:10.3138/cart-2021-0013.
   Google Scholar
• Lally, N. 2022b. What can GIS do? ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 21 (4):337–45.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1960. Image of a city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maharawal, M. M., and E. McElroy. 2018. The anti-eviction mapping project: Counter mapping and oral history toward bay area housing justice. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (2):380–9. doi:10.1080/24694452.2017.1365583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, T. 2018. Feminist in a software lab: Difference + design. Cambridge, MA; Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mogel, L. 2011. Disorientation guides: Cartography as artistic medium. In Geohumanities: Art, history, text at the edge of place, ed. M. Dear, J. Ketchum, S. Luria, and D. Richardson, 187–95. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, P. J., D. Dixon, D. Pullanikkatil, B. Moyo, H. Long, and B. Barrett. 2019. Malawi stories: Mapping an art-science collaborative process. Journal of Maps 15 (3):39–47. doi:10.1080/17445647.2019.1582440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson, P. J. 2022. Technologies, aesthetics and affordances. In Routledge handbook of geospatial technologies and society, ed. D. Specht and A. Kent. Boca Raton, FL: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paglen, T. 2008. Experimental geography: From cultural production to the production of space. In Experimental geography: Radical approaches to landscape, cartography, and urbanism, ed. N. Thompson, 27–33. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, M. W. 2008. Framing the days: Place and narrative in cartography. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 35 (1):17–32. doi:10.1559/152304008783475661.
   Google Scholar
• Rose-Redwood, R., N. B. Barnd, A. H. Lucchesi, S. Dias, and W. Patrick. 2020. Decolonizing the map: Recentering Indigenous mappings. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 55 (3):151–62. doi:10.3138/cart.53.3.intro.
   Google Scholar
• Simondon, G. 2016. On the mode of existence of technical objects. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, G. 2014. ‘I wanted to lie down and die,’ Trafficking and torture of Eritreans in Sudan and Egypt. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/report/2014/02/11/i-wanted-lie-down-and-die/trafficking-and-torture-eritreans-sudan-and-egypt.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. 2007. Ordinary affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sui, D. Z. 2004. GIS, cartography, and the “Third Culture”: Geographic imaginations in the computer age. The Professional Geographer 56 (1):62–72. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.2004.05601008.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar