Hyper, Broken, and Artificial: How (Not) to Communicate about Climate Change

REFERENCES

• Adams, P. C. 2017. Geographies of media and communication I: Metaphysics of encounter. Progress in Human Geography 41 (3):365–74. doi:10.1177/0309132516628254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, P. C., and A. Jansson. 2012. Communication geography: A bridge between disciplines. Communication Theory 22 (3):299–318. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01406.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J., Cupples, K. Glynn, A. Jansson, and S. Moores. 2016. Communications/media/geographies. 1st ed. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315740737.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. 1994. Simulacra and simulation. Trans. S. F. Glaser. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, E. M., T. Gebru, A. McMillan-Major, and M. Mitchell. 2021. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 610–23. doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. 2019. Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code. Medford, MA: Polity Press. doi:10.1093/sf/soz162.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2013. The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Brevini, B. 2022. Is AI good for the planet? Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Brisini, T. 2019. Phytomorphizing performance: Plant performance in an expanded field. Text and Performance Quarterly 39 (1):3–21. doi:10.1080/10462937.2018.1559350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, D. C., and C. E. Morris. 2021. Decentering whiteness in AIDS memory: Indigent rhetorical criticism and the dead of Hart Island. Quarterly Journal of Speech 107 (2):160–84. doi:10.1080/00335630.2021.1905868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bubandt, N. 2017. Haunted geologies: Spirits, stones, and the necropolitics of the Anthropocene. In Arts of living on a damaged planet, ed. A. Tsing, H. Swanson, E. Gan, and N. Bubandt, G121–41. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buolamwini, J., and T. Gebru. 2018. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 77–91. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html?mod=article_inline.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. 2009. The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry 35 (2):197–222. doi:10.1086/596640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Classen, C. L. 2022. Communication at the end of the world: Affective material performativity and the nuclear danger sign. Text and Performance Quarterly 42 (2):144–64. doi:10.1080/10462937.2022.2033825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh, M. 2022. The political philosophy of AI: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, K. 2021. Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeBoom, M. J. 2021. Climate necropolitics: Ecological civilization and the distributive geographies of extractive violence in the Anthropocene. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111 (3):900–12. doi:10.1080/24694452.2020.1843995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehnert, M. 2021. Communication geographies of human-machine understanding: Entangled agencies, synthetic aesthetics, and machine matterings. Communication Studies 72 (6):1146–59. doi:10.1080/10510974.2021.2011360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., A. Gambino, and C. Edwards. 2022. Factors of attraction in human-machine communication. Publizistik 67 (4):517–29. doi:10.1007/s11616-022-00756-6.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, V. 2018. Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Gandy, M. 2019. The fly that tried to save the world: Saproxylic geographies and other-than-human ecologies. Transactions (Institute of British Geographers : 1965) 44 (2):392–406. doi:10.1111/tran.12281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemeinboeck, P. 2022. Difference-in-relation: Diffracting human-robot encounters. Journal of New Materialist Research 3 (1):29–55. doi:10.1007/s00146-015-0631-6.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. 2008. Chaos, territory, art: Deleuze and the framing of the earth. Irvington, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guzman, A. L. 2018. Introduction: “What is human-machine communication, anyway?” In Human-machine communication: Rethinking communication, technology, and ourselves, ed. A. L. Guzman, 1–28. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kellner, D. 1996. “Baudrillard: A new McLuhan?” https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/baudrillardanewmcluhan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kitson, J., and K. McHugh. 2015. Historic enchantments – materializing nostalgia. Cultural Geographies 22 (3):487–508. doi:10.1177/1474474014549946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, S. C., and J. T. Johnson. 2016. The agency of place: Toward a more-than-human geographical self. GeoHumanities 2 (1):149–66. doi:10.1080/2373566X.2016.1157003.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K.-F., and C. Qiufan. 2021. AI 2041: Ten visions for our future. London: WH Allen.
   Google Scholar
• Lindell, J. 2016. Communication as spatial production: Expanding the research agenda of communication geography. Space and Culture 19 (1):56–66. doi:10.1177/1206331215596480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon, S. L., R. Asen, K. R. Chávez, and R. G. Howard. 2016. Text + field: Innovations in rhetorical method. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monserrate, S. G. 2023. Thermotemporalities, thermomasculinities: Uptime, downtime, and server heat in the digital Anthropocene. New Media & Society 25 (2):324–44. doi:10.1177/14614448221149938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, T. 2013. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, S. U. 2018. Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H. 2021. In AI we trust: Power, illusion and control of predictive algorithms. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Pasek, A., H. Vaughan, and N. Starosielski. 2023. The world wide web of carbon: Toward a relational footprinting of information and communications technology’s climate impacts. Big Data & Society 10 (1):205395172311589. doi:10.1177/20539517231158994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, C., and C. G. Druschke, eds. 2018. Field rhetoric: Ethnography, ecology, and engagement in the places of persuasion. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raynor, R., and C. Veal. 2023. Spectacle of endings: In an “endless present.” GeoHumanities 9 (1):158–69. doi:10.1080/2373566X.2022.2144405.
   Google Scholar
• Rife, T. S. 2020. Scaling the necropolitical Anthropocene. Departures in Critical Qualitative Research 9 (4):77–91. doi:10.1525/dcqr.2020.9.4.77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sætra, H. S., ed. 2023. Technology and sustainable development: The promise and pitfalls of techno-solutionism. New York: Routledge. doi:10.1201/9781003325086.
   Google Scholar
• Scranton, R. 2015. Learning to die in the Anthropocene: Reflections on the end of a civilization. San Francisco, CA: City Light Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sharabi, L. L. 2021. Exploring how beliefs about algorithms shape (offline) success in online dating: A two-wave longitudinal investigation. Communication Research 48 (7):931–52. doi:10.1177/0093650219896936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. 2021. Do objects perform? Anthrolithic performance in Chaco Canyon. Text and Performance Quarterly 41 (1–2):21–36. doi:10.1080/10462937.2021.1919314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, É. P. 2023. I see some folks starting to use the “TESCREAL” acronym. So, here’s a short thread on what it stands for and why it’s important. March 13. [Twitter thread]. https://twitter.com/xriskology/status/1635313838508883968?s=20
   Google Scholar
• Torres, É. P. 2021. The dangerous ideas of “longtermism” and “existential risk.” Current Affairs, July 28. https://www.currentaffairs.org/2021/07/the-dangerous-ideas-of-longtermism-and-existential-risk
   Google Scholar
• Towns, A. R. 2018. Whither the human? An open letter to the ‘Race and Rhetoric’ forum. https://docs.google.com/document/d/12LFu8xlLpdoOV92JG-8jCNJZQQyn5PMR6XczxTww00w/edit#
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A., H. Swanson, E. Gan, and N. Bubandt, eds. 2017. Arts of living on a damaged planet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velkova, J., and J.-C. Plantin. 2023. Data centers and the infrastructural temporalities of digital media: An introduction. New Media & Society 25 (2):273–86. doi:10.1177/14614448221149945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainwright, J. 2020. How not to think about climate change. GeoHumanities 6 (1):205–14. doi:10.1080/2373566X.2020.1735475.
   Google Scholar
• Wynter, S. 2003. Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation—an argument. Cr: The New Centennial Review 3 (3):257–337. doi:10.1353/ncr.2004.0015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusoff, K. 2018. A billion black Anthropocenes or none. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yusoff, K. 2021. The inhumanities. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111 (3):663–76. doi:10.1080/24694452.2020.1814688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar