REFERENCES
- Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheuefele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Ladwig, P. (2013). The “nasty effect”: Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 373–387.
- Aristotle. (1952). Loeb classical library: Aristotle: The Eudemian ethics (H. Rackham, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Attenborough, D. (2009, May 19). Attenborough on Ida: This little creature is going to show our connection with all other mammals [Video File]. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/video/2009/may/19/ida-fossil-attenborough-missing-link
- Bazerman, C. (1999). The languages of Edison's light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- boyd, d. (2010 May 14). Facebook and “radical transparency” (a rant). apophenia. Retrieved from http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2010/05/14/facebook-and-radical-transparency-a-rant.html
- bperki8. (2009). Media hype. [User comment.] PLoS ONE. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/annotation/listThread.action?root=8655
- Burton, G. O. (2007). Anacoenosis. Silva Rhetoricae. Retrieved from http://rhetoric.byu.edu/
- Calhoun, C. (1995). Standing for something. Journal of Philosophy, 92(5), 235–260.
- Campbell, J. A. (1975). The polemical Mr. Darwin. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61(4), 375–390.
- coblo. (2009). Postures different in plate A and B. [User comment.] PLoS ONE. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/annotation/listThread.action;jsessionid=8D8EB0CBEA91120B6747EB6E5B1A2AC3?root=13349
- Coleman, M. C. (2015). Connecting integrity, respect, and ethical disagreement in Darwin and Dawkins. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 48(3), 293–313.
- Comments. (n.d.). Guidelines for comments. PLoS ONE. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/static/commentGuidelines
- Community standards. (2009). The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/community-standards
- Cowboy82. (2009). [User comment]. Popular Science. Retrieved from http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2009-05/monkey-business#comment-161310
- Crichton, M. (1990). Jurassic park. New York, NY: Random House.
- Dewey, J. (2012). The public and its problems: An essay in political inquiry (Melvin L. Rogers, Ed.). University Park, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. (Original work published 1927)
- Fahnestock, J. (1999). Rhetorical figures in science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Foxman, A., & Wolf, C. (2013). Viral hate: Containing its spread on the Internet. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Franzen, J. L., Gingerich, P. D., Habersetzer, J., Hurum, J. H., von Koenigswald, W., & Smith, B. H. (2009). Complete primate skeleton from the middle Eocene of Messel in Germany: Morphology and paleobiology. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5723. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005723. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0005723
- Goodnight, G. T. (1982). The personal, technical, and public spheres of argument: A speculative inquiry into the art of public deliberation. Journal of the American Forensics Association, 18(4), 214–227.
- Good practice. (n.d.). PLoS ONE. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/static/commentGuidelines#who
- Guide for reviewers. (n.d.). Does the manuscript report on primary research? PLoS ONE. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/static/reviewerGuidelines
- Habermas, J. (2008). Between naturalism and religion: Philosophical essays (C. Cronin, Trans.). Malden, MA: Polity Press.
- Halloran, S. M. (1984). The birth of molecular biology: An essay in the rhetorical criticism of scientific discourse. Rhetoric Review, 3, 70–83.
- Jackson, N. (2014 August 12). Just kill all of the comments already. Pacific Standard. Retrieved from http://www.psmag.com/navigation/nature-and-technology/just-kill-comments-already-88188/
- Janakiram, N., & Zunger, Y. (2013, September 24). We hear you: Better commenting coming to YouTube. YouTube. Retrieved from http://youtube-global.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/youtube-new-comments.html
- Jannot, M. (2010). Popular Science: Mission statement. Popular Science. Retrieved from http://www.popsci.com/files/PopularScience.2010MK.pdf
- keesey. (2009). Nomenclaturally valid? [User comment.] PLoS ONE. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/annotation/listThread.action?root=20463
- LaBarre, S. (2013, September 24). Why we're shutting off our comments. Popular Science. Retrieved from http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-09/why-were-shutting-our-comments
- Lapidot-Lefier, N., & Barak, A. (2012). Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 434–443.
- Lawson, C. (2010). Technology and the extension of human capabilities. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 40(2), 207–223. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00428.x
- Lipari, L. (2012). Rhetoric's other: Levinas, listening, and the ethical response. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 45(3), 227–245.
- Lynch, J. A., & Kinsella, W. J. (2013). The rhetoric of technology as a rhetorical technology. Poroi: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Rhetorical Analysis and Invention, 9(1), 1–7.
- Manuscript guidelines. (n.d.). Manuscript organization. PLoS ONE. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/static/guidelines
- Miller, C. R. (1994). Opportunity, opportunism, and progress: Kairos in the rhetoric of technology. Argumentation, 8(1), 81–96.
- Mossberg, W., & Swisher, K. (2014, November 20). A note to re/code readers. re/code. Retrieved from http://recode.net/2014/11/20/a-note-to-recode-readers/
- Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Open ministry–crowdsourcing legislation. (2014). Open Ministry. Retrieved from http://openministry.info/
- Petitioners take gay marriage bill to Parliament. (2013). Yle uutiset. Retrieved from http://yle.fi/uutiset/petitioners_take_gay_marriage_bill_to_parliament/6544701
- Pianalto, M. (2012). Moral courage and facing others. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 20(2), 165–184.
- Putnam, R. A. (1988). Reciprocity and virtue ethics. Ethics, 98, 379–389.
- Rowland, R. C. (1986). The relationship between the public and the technical spheres of argument: A case study of the Challenger Seven disaster. Central States Speech Journal, 37(3), 136–146.
- Santana, A. D. (2014). Virtuous or vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards. Journalism Practice, 8(1), 18–33.
- Schiappa, E. (1989). “Spheres of argument” as topoi for the critical study of power/knowledge. In B. E. Gronbeck (Ed.), Spheres of argument: Proceedings of the sixth SCA/AFA conference on argumentation. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
- Sidler, M. (2014). The chemistry liveblogging event: The web refigures peer review. In A. Gross & J. Buehl (Eds.), Science and the Internet: Communicating knowledge in a digital age. Unpublished manuscript.
- Sonderman, J. (2014, November 24). News sites using Facebook comments see higher quality discussion, more referrals. Poynter. Retrieved from http://www.poynter.org/news/media-innovation/143192/news-sites-using-facebook-comments-see-higher-quality-discussion-more-referrals/
- Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326.
- syzguy111888. (2009). [User comment]. Popular Science. Retrieved from http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2009-05/monkey-business#comment-161310
- Terms of use. (2014). Popular Science.com. Retrieved from http://www.popsci.com/terms-of-use
- texmc. (2009). [User comment]. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/science/2009/may/19/ida-fossil-missing-link?commentpage=1
- Thompson, D. (2013). The 10 most common (and 10 least common) jobs in America today. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/04/the-10-most-common-and-10-least-common-jobs-in-america-today/274526/
- Williams, B. (1981). Persons, character, and morality. In Moral luck: Philosophical papers 1973–1980 (pp. 1–19). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Zappen, J. P. (2005). Digital rhetoric: Toward an integrated theory. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 319–325.