Normal cyber accidents

References

• Allhoff, F., A. Henschke, and B. J. Strawser. 2016. Binary Bullets: The Ethics of Cyberwarfare. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arquilla, J., and D. Ronfeldt. 1993. “Cyberwar is Coming!.” Comparative Strategy 12 (2): 141–165. doi:10.1080/01495939308402915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, D. J., and T. Stevens. 2013. “Analogical Reasoning and Cyber Security.” Sage (atlanta, Ga ) 44 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Bonfanti, M. E. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence and the Offence-Defence Balance in Cyber Security.” In Cyber Security Politics: Socio-Technological Transformations and Political Fragmentation, edited by M. Dunn Cavelty and A. Wenger, 64–79. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Borghard, E. D., and S. W. Lonergan. 2019. “Cyber Operations as Imperfect Tools of Escalation.” Strategic Studies Quarterly 13 (3): 122–145.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H. 2018. “Keeping the Lights On: A Comparison of Normal Accidents and High Reliability Organizations.” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 37 (2): 62–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueger, C., and T. Liebetrau. 2021. “Protecting Hidden Infrastructure: The Security Politics of the Global Submarine Data Cable Network.” Contemporary Security Policy 42 (3): 391–413. doi:10.1080/13523260.2021.1907129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, J., and G. Christou. 2021. “Bridging the Gap Between Cyberwar and Cyberpeace.” International Affairs 97 (6): 1727–1747. doi:10.1093/ia/iiab172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, J., and C. Lain. 2020. “Desecuritising Cybersecurity: Towards a Societal Approach.” Journal of Cyber Policy 5 (3): 449–470. doi:10.1080/23738871.2020.1856903
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., O. Waever, and J. de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Cambridge University Press Online.
   Google Scholar
• Carrapico, H., and A. Barrinha. 2017. “The EU as a Coherent (Cyber) Security Actor?” JCMS May.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Internet Security. 2021. “The SolarWinds Cyber-Attack: What You Need to Know.” Article accessed 2022. https://www.cisecurity.org/solarwinds.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, T. M., L. Jarvis, and S. Macdonald, eds. 2014. Cyberterrorism: Understanding, Assessment, and Response. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Christou, G. 2016. Cybersecurity in the European Union: Resilience and Adaptability in Governance Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Christou, G. 2019. “The Collective Securitisation of Cyberspace in the European Union.” West European Politics 42 (2): 278–301. doi:10.1080/01402382.2018.1510195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. A., and R. K. Knake. 2010. Cyber War: The Next Threat to National Security and What to do About it. New York: Ecco.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. 2015. “Submarine Cables, Cybersecurity and International Law: An Intersectional Analysis.” Cath. UJL & Tech 24: 57.
   Google Scholar
• Dipert, R. R. 2010. “The Ethics of Cyberwarfare.” Journal of Military Ethics 9 (4): 384–410. doi:10.1080/15027570.2010.536404
   Google Scholar
• Dunn Cavelty, M. 2008. “Cyber-terror—Looming Threat or Phantom Menace? The Framing of the US Cyber-Threat Debate.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 4 (1): 19–36. doi:10.1300/J516v04n01_03
   Google Scholar
• Dunn Cavelty, M. 2010. “Cyber-security.” In The Routledge Handbook of New Security Studies, edited by J. P. Burgess, 154–162. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn Cavelty, M. 2018. “Cybersecurity Research Meets Science and Technology Studies.” Politics and Governance 6 (2): 22–30. doi:10.17645/pag.v6i2.1385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn Cavelty, M., and A. Wenger. 2022. Cyber Security Politics: Socio-Technological Transformations and Political Fragmentation, 286. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, J., and G. Giacomello, eds. 2007. International Relations and Security in the Digital age (Vol. 52). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, J., and G. Giacomello. 2022. “Cyberspace in Space: Fragmentation, Vulnerability, and Uncertainty.” In Cyber Security Politics: Socio-Technological Transformations and Political Fragmentation, edited by M. Dunn Cavelty and A. Wenger, 95–108. Obingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feathers, M. C. 2005. Working Effectively with Legacy Code. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Franken, J., T. Reinhold, L. Reichert, and C. Reuter. 2022. “The Digital Divide in State Vulnerability to Submarine Communications Cable Failure.” International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection 38: 100522. doi:10.1016/j.ijcip.2022.100522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjesvik, L., and K. Szulecki. 2023. “Interpreting Cyber-Energy-Security Events: Experts, Social Imaginaries, and Policy Discourses Around the 2016 Ukraine Blackout.” European Security 32 (1): 104–124. doi:10.1080/09662839.2022.2082838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, J. 2020. The Five Eyes and Offensive Cyber Capabilities: Building a ‘Cyber Deterrence Initiative’. Tallinn, Estonia: NATO CCDCOE.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin, I., and M. Mariathasan. 2014. “The Butterfly Defect: Why Globalization Creates Systemic Risks and What to do About it.” Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions 7 (4): 325–327.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, M. A., and C. Whyte. 2022. “Cyber Uncertainties: Observations from Cross-National War Games.” In Cyber Security Politics: Socio-Technological Transformations and Political Fragmentation, edited by M. Dunn Cavelty and A. Wenger, 111–127. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, T., M. Kaminska, J. Shires, and M. Smeets. 2023. The Cyber Dimensions of the Russia-Ukraine War. ECCRI.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, L., and H. Nissenbaum. 2009. “Digital Disaster, Cyber Security, and the Copenhagen School.” International Studies Quarterly 53 (4): 1155–1175. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00572.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, J. T. 2021. “Cyber Offense in NATO: Challenges and Opportunities.” International Affairs 97 (3): 703–720. doi:10.1093/ia/iiab010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. 2016. “Cyberwarfare as Ideal War.” In Binary Bullets: The Ethics of Cyberwarfare, edited by Fritz Allhoff, Adam Henschke, and Bradley Jay Strawser. New York: Oxford Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kaseya. 2021. “Incident Overview and Technical Details.” Accessed 2022. https://helpdesk.kaseya.com/hc/en-gb/articles/4403584098961-Incident-Overview-Technical-Details.
   Google Scholar
• Kello, L. 2017. The Virtual Weapon and International Order. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerigan-Kyro, D. 2014. “NATO and Critical Infrastructure Resilience–Planning for the Unknown.” In Critical Infrastructure Protection, edited by M. Edwards, 1–12. IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• La Porte, T. 1994. “A Strawman Speaks up: Comments on the Limits of Safety.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 2 (4).
   Google Scholar
• La Porte, T. 1996. “High Reliability Organizations: Unlikely, Demanding and At Risk.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 4 (2). doi:10.1111/j.1468-5973.1996.tb00078.x
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, S. T. 2013. “Beyond Cyber-Doom: Assessing the Limits of Hypothetical Scenarios in the Framing of Cyber-Threats.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 10 (1). doi:10.1080/19331681.2012.759059
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, S. T. 2019. Cybersecurity Discourse in the United States: Cyber-Doom Rhetoric and Beyond. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Le Coze, J.-C. 2015. “1984-2014. Normal Accidents. Was Charles Perrow Right for the Wrong Reasons?” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 23 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Coze, J.-C. 2021. Post Normal Accident: Revisiting Perrow's Classic. 1st Edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehto, M. 2022. “Cyber-attacks Against Critical Infrastructure.” In Cyber Security. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, edited by M. Lehto and P. Neittaanmäki, 3–42. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Libicki, M. C. 2009. Cyberdeterrence and Cyberwar. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. xii-xvii.
   Google Scholar
• Libicki, M. C., and Project Air Force (US). 2012. Crisis and Escalation in Cyberspace [Elektronisk Resurs] (1). Vancouver: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Liebetrau, T., K. K. Christensen, and K. K. 2021. “The Ontological Politics of Cyber Security: Emerging Agencies, Actors, Sites, and Spaces.” European Journal of International Security 6 (1): 25–43. doi:10.1017/eis.2020.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. S. 2012. “Escalation Dynamics and Conflict Termination in Cyberspace.” Strategic Studies Quarterly 6 (3): 46–70.
   Google Scholar
• Michalec, O., S. Milyaeva, and A. Rashid. 2022. “When the Future Meets the Past: Can Safety and Cyber Security Coexist in Modern Critical Infrastructures?” Big Data & Society 9 (1). doi:10.1177/20539517221108369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, J. D., and I. Walden. 2018. “How Safe is Safe Enough? Improving Cybersecurity in Europe's Critical Infrastructure Under the NIS Directive.” Improving Cybersecurity in Europe's Critical Infrastructure Under the NIS Directive, December 7. Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper 291.
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft. 2022. Defending Ukraine: Early Lessons from the Cyber War.” Report. June.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. 2022. Offensive Cyber Operations: Understanding Intangible Warfare. London: Hurst & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, S. 2016. “Legacy isn’t a Bad Word.” Blog. https://samuelmullen.com/articles/legacy_isnt_a_bad_word.
   Google Scholar
• National Cyber Force. 2023. “Responsible Cyber Power in Practice, April 4.” Gov.UK.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S. 2010. Cyber Power. Cambridge: Harvard Kennedy School, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. 1-24.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlin, J. D., K. Govern, and C. Finkelstein, eds. 2015. Cyber War: Law and Ethics for Virtual Conflicts. 1st edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perrow, C. 1984. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Perrow, C. 1999. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. revised edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rid, T. 2012. “Cyber War Will not Take Place.” Journal of Strategic Studies 35 (1): 5–32. doi:10.1080/01402390.2011.608939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riebe, T., and C. Reuter. 2019. “Dual-Use and Dilemmas for Cybersecurity, Peace and Technology Assessment.” In , Information Technology for Peace and Security, edited by C. Reuter, 163–183. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg.
   Google Scholar
• Rijpma, J. A. 1997. “Complexity, Tight–Coupling and Reliability: Connecting Normal Accidents Theory and High Reliability Theory.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 5 (1): 15–23. doi:10.1111/1468-5973.00033
   Google Scholar
• Rudner, M. 2013. “Cyber-threats to Critical National Infrastructure: An Intelligence Challenge.” International Journal of Intelligence and Counter Intelligence 26 (3): 453–481. doi:10.1080/08850607.2013.780552
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz-Berndt, S., and M. D. Cole. 2022. “Towards an Efficient and Coherent Regulatory Framework on Cybersecurity in the EU: The Proposals for a NIS 2.0 Directive and a Cyber Resilience Act.” Applied Cybersecurity & Internet Governance 1 (1). doi:10.5604/01.3001.0016.1323
   Google Scholar
• Smeets, M. 2018. “The Strategic Promise of Offensive Cyber Operations.” Strategic Studies Quarterly 12 (3): 90–113.
   Google Scholar
• Smeets, M. 2022. No Shortcuts: Why States Struggle to Develop a Military Cyber-Force. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smeets, M., and H. S. Lin. 2018. “Offensive Cyber Capabilities: To What Ends?” International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CYCON). May, 55–71.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, T. 2018. “Global Cybersecurity: New Directions in Theory and Methods.” Politics and Governance 6 (2): 1–4. doi:10.17645/pag.v6i2.1569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truesec. 2021. “Kaseya Supply Chain Attack Targeting MSPs to Deliver REvil Ransomware.” Article accessed 2022. https://www.truesec.com/hub/blog/kaseya-supply-chain-attack-targeting-msps-to-deliver-revil-ransomware.
   Google Scholar
• UK National Audit Office/Department of Health. 2018. “Investigation: WannaCry Cyber Attack and the NHS.” Report by the Controller and Auditor General. Session, 2017–2019.
   Google Scholar
• US Government Accountability Office. 2021. “SolarWinds Cyberattack Demands Significant Federal and Private-Sector Response.” Article accessed 2023.https://www.gao.gov/blog/solarwinds-cyberattack-demands-significant-federal-and-private-sector-response-infographic.
   Google Scholar
• Valeriano, B. G., and B. Jenson. 2019. “The Myth of the Cyber Offense: The Case for Cyber Restraint.” Cato Institute Policy Analysis 862.
   Google Scholar
• Valeriano, B. G., and R. C. Maness. 2015. Cyber War Versus Cyber Realities: Cyber Conflict in the International System. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S. 2020. “Legacy Systems in a Connected World: Securing Critical Infrastructure.” Article accessed 2022. https://manufacturingdigital.com/technology/legacy-systems-connected-world-securing-critical-infrastructure.
   Google Scholar
• Willett, M. 2022. “The Cyber Dimension of the Russia–Ukraine War.” Survival 64 (5): 7–26. doi:10.1080/00396338.2022.2126193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar