Efficacy of semi-empirical models for prediction of forming limit curve of IN718 alloy at elevated temperatures

References

• Reed RC. The Superalloys fundamentals and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad KS, Panda SK, Kar SK, et al. Effect of solution treatment on deep drawability of IN718 sheets: experimental analysis and metallurgical characterization. Mater Sci Eng A. 2018;727:97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad KS, Panda SK, Kar SK, et al. Prediction of fracture and deep drawing behavior of solution treated Inconel-718 sheets: numerical modeling and experimental validation. Mater Sci Eng A. 2018;733:393–407.
   Google Scholar
• Badrish CA, Kotkunde N, Mahalle G, et al. Analysis of hot anisotropic tensile flow stress and strain hardening behavior for Inconel 625 alloy. J Mater Eng Perform. 2019;28:7537–7553.
   Google Scholar
• Luo SD, Qian M. Microwave processing of titanium and titanium alloys for structural, biomedical and shape memory applications: current status and challenges. Mater Manuf Process. 2018;33:35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Lu X. Preparation process of magnesium alloys by complex salt dehydration-electrochemical codeposition. Mater Manuf Process. 2019;34:591–597.
   Google Scholar
• Jafarian F, Masoudi S, Soleimani H, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of thermal loads in Inconel 718 machining. Mater Manuf Process. 2018;23:1020–1029.
   Google Scholar
• Mahalle G, Morchhale A, Kotkunde N, et al. Forming and fracture limits of IN718 alloy at elevated temperatures: experimental and theoretical investigation. J Manuf Process. 2020;56:482–499.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad SK, Panda SK, Kar SK, et al. Microstructures, forming limit and failure analyses of Inconel 718 sheets for fabrication of aerospace components. J Mater Eng Perform. 2017;26:1513–1530.
   Google Scholar
• Mahalle G, Kotkunde N, Shah R, et al. Analysis of flow stress behaviour of Inconel alloys at elevated temperatures using constitutive model. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018;1063:012037.
   Google Scholar
• Volk W, Groche P, Brosius A, et al. Models and modelling for process limits in metal forming. CIRP Ann. 2019;68:775–798.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaforian Nosrati H, Gerdooei M, Falahati Naghibi M. Experimental and numerical study on formability in tube bulging: a comparison between hydroforming and rubber pad forming. Mater Manuf Process. 2017;32:1353–1359.
   Google Scholar
• Huang L, Shi M. Forming limit curves of advanced high strength steels: experimental determination and empirical prediction. SAE Int J Mater Manuf. 2018;11:409–418.
   Google Scholar
• Hu Q, Zhang F, Li X, et al. Overview on the prediction models for sheet metal forming failure: necking and ductile fracture. Acta Mech Solida Sin. 2018;31:259–289.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad K, Panda S, Kar S, et al. Effect of solution treatment on the formability and part performance of IN718 sheet material. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2018;4:680–694.
   Google Scholar
• Satish DR, Kumar DR, Merklein M. Effect of temperature and punch speed on forming limit strains of AA5182 alloy in warm forming and improvement in failure prediction in finite element analysis. J Strain Anal Eng Des. 2017;52:258–273.
   Google Scholar
• Lin J, Balint D, Pietrzyk M. Microstructure evolution in metal forming processes. Woodhead Publishing; 2012. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857096340.
   Google Scholar
• Dilmec M, Halkaci HS, Ozturk F, et al. Effects of sheet thickness and anisotropy on forming limit curves of AA2024-T4. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2013;67:2689–2700.
   Google Scholar
• Basak S, Panda SK. Failure strains of anisotropic thin sheet metals: experimental evaluation and theoretical prediction. Int J Mech Sci. 2019;151:356–374.
   Google Scholar
• Basak S, Panda SK. Necking and fracture limit analyses of different pre-strained sheet materials in polar effective plastic strain locus using Yld2000-2d yield model. J Mater Process Technol. 2019;267:289–307.
   Google Scholar
• Banabic D, Carleer B, Comsa DS, et al. Sheet metal forming processes: constitutive modelling and numerical simulation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Banabic D, Kami A, Comsa DS, et al. Developments of the Marciniak-Kuczynski model for sheet metal formability: a review. J Mater Process Technol. 2019;1–14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116446
   Google Scholar
• Chow CL, Jie M, Hu SJ. Forming limit analysis of sheet metals based on a generalized deformation theory. J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME. 2003;125:260–265.
   Google Scholar
• Paul SK, Manikandan G, Verma RK. Prediction of entire forming limit diagram from simple tensile material properties. J Strain Anal Eng Des. 2013;48:386–394.
   Google Scholar
• Mahalle G, Kotkunde N, Gupta AK, et al. Microstructure characteristics and comparative analysis of constitutive models for flow stress prediction of Inconel 718 alloy. J Mater Eng Perform. 2019;28:3321.
   Google Scholar
• Mahalle G, Kotkunde N, Gupta AK, et al. Prediction of flow stress behaviour by materials modelling technique for Inconel 718 alloy at elevated temperature. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2020;00:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Roamer P, Van Tyne CJ, Matlock DK, et al. Room temperature formability of alloys 625LCF, 718 and 718SPF. Miner Met Mater Soc. 1997;315–329. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7449/1997/superalloys_1997_315_329
   Google Scholar
• Mahalle G, Kotkunde N, Gupta AK, et al. Analysis of hot workability of Inconel alloys using processing maps. Adv Comput Methods Manuf. 2019:109–118. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9072-3_10.
   Google Scholar
• Mahalle G, Salunke O, Kotkunde N, et al. Anisotropic yielding behaviour of Inconel 718 alloy at elevated temperatures. ASME Int Mech Eng Congr Expo Proc. 2019;2A:1–5. . Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Mahalle G, Salunke O, Kotkunde N, et al. Neural network modeling for anisotropic mechanical properties and work hardening behavior of Inconel 718 alloy at elevated temperatures. J Mater Res Technol. 2019;8:2130–2140.
   Google Scholar