Selection of appropriate process inputs for turning Ti-6Al-4V alloy under hybrid Al₂O₃-MWCNT nano-fluid based MQL

References

• Cui C, Hu BM, Zhao L, et al. Titanium alloy production technology, market prospects and industry development. Mater Des. 2011;32(3):1684–1691.
   Google Scholar
• Veiga C, Davim JP, Loureiro AJR. Review on machinability of titanium alloys: the process perspective. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2013;34:148–164.
   Google Scholar
• Mondal A, Roy P, Mitra S. Experimental investigation on electro discharge machining of Ti6Al4V alloy. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2020. DOI:10.1080/2374068X.2020.1759913
   Google Scholar
• Işik B, Kentli A. The prediction of surface temperature in drilling of Ti6Al4V. Arch Metall Mater. 2014;59(2):467–471.
   Google Scholar
• Vijay S, Krishnaraj V. Machining parameters optimization in end milling of Ti-6A1-4V. Procedia Eng. 2013;64:1079–1088.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra MJ, Ramachandra CG, Srinivas TR, et al. Optimization of surface roughness in turning operation in machining of TI-6AL-4V (Titanium Grade −5). IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2018;376:012118.
   Google Scholar
• Hassanpour H, Sadeghi MH, Rezaei H, et al. Experimental study of cutting force, microhardness, surface roughness, and burr size on micromilling of Ti6Al4V in minimum quantity lubrication. Mater Manuf Process. 2016;31(13):1654–1662.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed LS, Pradeep Kumar M. Investigation of cryogenic cooling effect in reaming Ti-6AL-4V alloy. Mater Manuf Process. 2017. DOI:10.1080/10426914.2016.1221088
   Google Scholar
• Mia M, Dhar NR. Influence of single and dual cryogenic jets on machinability characteristics in turning of Ti-6Al-4V. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf. 2019;233(3):711–726.
   Google Scholar
• Yasa E, Pilatin S, Çolak O. Overview of cryogenic cooling in machining of Ti alloys and a case study. J Prod Eng. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Revuru RS, Posinasetti NR, Vsn VR, et al. Application of cutting fluids in machining of titanium alloys—a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2017;91(5–8):2477–2498.
   Google Scholar
• Jadhav PA, Deivanathan R. Experimental analysis of the influence of lubrication strategy and machining parameters on surface roughness & tool wear in milling of TI-6AL-4V using taguchi based grey relational analysis. Int J Mech Prod Eng Res Dev. 2019. DOI:10.24247/ijmperdjun2019121
   Google Scholar
• Masoudi S, Vafadar A, Hadad M, et al. Experimental investigation into the effects of nozzle position, workpiece hardness, and tool type in MQL turning of AISI 1045 steel. Mater Manuf Process. 2018;33(9):1011–1019.
   Google Scholar
• Hegab H, Umer U, Deiab I, et al. Performance evaluation of Ti–6Al–4V machining using nano-cutting fluids under minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018. DOI:10.1007/s00170-017-1527-z
   Google Scholar
• Park KH, Yang GD, Suhaimi MA, et al. The effect of cryogenic cooling and minimum quantity lubrication on end milling of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. J Mech Sci Technol. 2015;29(12):5121–5126.
   Google Scholar
• Duc TM, Long TT, Chien TQ. Performance Evaluation of MQL Parameters Using Al2O3 and MoS2 Nanofluids in Hard Turning 90CrSi Steel. Lubricants 2019;7:40(1–17).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li C, Zhang Y, et al. Performances of Al2O3/SiC hybrid nanofluids in minimum-quantity lubrication grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;86(9–12):3427–3441.
   Google Scholar
• Sultana MN, Dhar NR, Zaman PBA. Review on different cooling/lubrication techniques in metal cutting. Am J Mech Appl. 2019;7:71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Jamil M, Khan AM, Hegab H, et al. Effects of hybrid Al2O3-CNT nanofluids and cryogenic cooling on machining of Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;102(9–12):3895–3909.
   Google Scholar
• Khatri A, Jahan MP. Investigating tool wear mechanisms in machining of Ti-6Al-4V in flood coolant, dry and MQL conditions. Procedia Manuf. 2018;26:434–445.
   Google Scholar
• Nam J, Kim JW, Kim JS, et al. Parametric analysis and optimization of nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication micro-drilling process for titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) using response surface methodology and desirability function. Procedia Manuf. 2018;26:403–414.
   Google Scholar
• Zaman PB, Dhar NR. Design and evaluation of an embedded double jet nozzle for MQL delivery intending machinability improvement in turning operation. J Manuf Process. 2019;44:179–196.
   Google Scholar
• Zaman PB, Dhar NR. Multi-objective optimization of double-jet MQL system parameters meant for enhancing the turning performance of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Arab J Sci Eng. 2020. 10.1007/s13369-020-04806-x
   Google Scholar
• Asadi A, Asadi M, Rezaniakolaei A, et al. Heat transfer efficiency of Al2O3-MWCNT/thermal oil hybrid nanofluid as a cooling fluid in thermal and energy management applications: an experimental and theoretical investigation. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;117:474–486.
   Google Scholar
• Chen L, Xie H, Li Y, et al. Nanofluids containing carbon nanotubes treated by mechanochemical reaction. Thermochim Acta. 2008;477(1–2):21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma P, Sidhu BS, Sharma J. Investigation of effects of nanofluids on turning of AISI D2 steel using minimum quantity lubrication. J Clean Prod. 2015;108:72–79.
   Google Scholar
• Venkata Ramana M. Optimization and influence of process parameters on surface roughness in turning of titanium alloy under different lubricant conditions. Elsevier Ltd Mater Today Proc. 2017;48:8328–8335.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori S, Taccin M, Pavese G, et al. Wear mechanisms of uncoated and coated carbide tools when machining Ti6Al4V using LN2 and cooled N2. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;95(1–4):1255–1264.
   Google Scholar
• Kechagias JD, Aslani KE, Fountas NA, et al. A comparative investigation of Taguchi and full factorial design for machinability prediction in turning of a titanium alloy. Meas J Int Meas Confed. 2020;151:107213.
   Google Scholar
• Asadi A, Asadi M, Rezaniakolaei A, et al. Heat transfer efficiency of Al2O3-MWCNT/thermal oil hybrid nanofluid as a cooling fluid in thermal and energy management applications: an experimental and theoretical investigation. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;117:474–486.
   Google Scholar
• Ogedengbe TS, Okediji AP, Yussouf AA, et al. The effects of heat generation on cutting tool and machined workpiece. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1378:022012. Institute of Physics Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mital A, Mehta M. Surface finish prediction models for fine turning. Int J Prod Res. 1988;26(12):1861–1876.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments: Eighth edition, Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,2013.
   Google Scholar
• Behera SK, Meena H, Chakraborty S, Meikap BC. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of leaching parameters for ash reduction from low-grade coal. Int J Min Sci Technol 2018. doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.04.014.
   Google Scholar
• Manohar M, Jomy Joseph TS. Application of Box Behnken design to optimize the parameters for turning Inconel 718 using coated carbide tools. Int J Sci Eng Res. 2013. D O I: 1 0 .4 314 / t jpr .v1 1i5.2
   Google Scholar
• Gupta MK, Sood PK, Sharma VS. Machining parameters optimization of titanium alloy using response surface methodology and particle swarm optimization under minimum-quantity lubrication environment. Mater Manuf Process. 2016;31(13):1671–1682.
   Google Scholar
• Zaman P, Dhar N. Multi-criteria process optimization for better machinability in turning medium carbon steel using composite desirability approach. Int J Manuf Res. 2021;16(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Derringer G, Suich R. Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables. J Qual Technol. 1980;12(4):214–219.
   Google Scholar
• Derringer GC. A balancing act: optimizing a product’s properties. Qual Prog. 1994;27:51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrgott M. Multicriteria optimization: Second edition. Springer. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Zaman PB, Saha S, Dhar NR. Hybrid Taguchi-GRA-PCA approach for multi-response optimisation of turning process parameters under HPC condition. Int J Mach Mach Mater. 2020;22:281–308.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Kumar Sahooa A, Satyanarayana K, et al. Some studies on cutting force and temperature in machining Ti-6AL-4V alloy using regression analysis and ANOVA. Int J Ind Eng Comput. 2013. DOI:10.5267/j.ijiec.2013.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Abukhshim NA, Mativenga PT, Sheikh MA. Heat generation and temperature prediction in metal cutting: A review and implications for high speed machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2006;46(7–8):782–800.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson DA, Agapiou JS. Metal cutting theory and practice. Third ed. 2016. DOI:10.1201/b19559
   Google Scholar
• Pal A, Choudhury SK, Chinchanikar S. Machinability assessment through experimental investigation during hard and soft turning of hardened steel. Procedia Mater Sci. 2014;6:80–91.
   Google Scholar
• Shah J, Ranjan M, Davariya V, et al. Temperature-dependent thermal conductivity and viscosity of synthesized a-alumina nanofluids. Appl Nanosci. 2017;7(8):803–813.
   Google Scholar
• Rao SN, Satyanarayana B, Venkatasubbaiah K. Experimental estimation of tool wear and cutting temperatures in mql using cutting fluids with cnt inclusion. Int J Eng Sci Technol. 2011; 3(4):2928-2931.
   Google Scholar
• Grzesik W, Nieslony P. A computational approach to evaluate temperature and heat partition in machining with multilayer coated tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2003;43(13):1311–1317.
   Google Scholar
• Zaman PB, Sultana N, Dhar NR. Quantifying the effects of cooling condition, tool type and cutting parameters on machinability of turning AISI 4140 steel using full factorial DOE. J Prod Syst Manuf Sci. 2020;1(1–17):0009.
   Google Scholar
• Mia M, Dhar NR. Prediction of surface roughness in hard turning under high pressure coolant using Artificial neural network. Meas J Int Meas Confed. 2016;92:464–474.
   Google Scholar
• Che-Haron CH, Jawaid A. The effect of machining on surface integrity of titanium alloy Ti-6% Al-4% v. J Mater Process Technol. 2005;166(2):188–192.
   Google Scholar
• Thandra SK, Choudhury SK. Effect of cutting parameters on cutting force, surface finish and tool wear in hot machining. Int J Mach Mach Mater. 2010;7:278.
   Google Scholar
• Nithyanandam J, Das SL, Palanikumar K. Influence of cutting parameters in machining of titanium alloy. Indian J Sci Technol. 2015;8(S8):556.
   Google Scholar
• Virdi RL, Chatha SS, Singh H. Processing characteristics of different vegetable oil-based nanofluid MQL for grinding of Ni-Cr alloy. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2020. DOI:10.1080/2374068X.2020.1800312
   Google Scholar
• Lee GJ, Park JJ, Lee MK, et al. Stable dispersion of nanodiamonds in oil and their tribological properties as lubricant additives. Appl Surf Sci. 2017;415:24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Srikant RR, Prasad MMS, Amrita M, et al. Nanofluids as a potential solution for minimum quantity lubrication: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf. 2014;228(1):3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmati B, Sarhan AAD, Sayuti M. Morphology of surface generated by end milling AL6061-T6 using molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanolubrication in end milling machining. J Clean Prod. 2014;66:685–691.
   Google Scholar
• Qin S, Li Z, Guo G, et al. Analysis of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) for different coating tools during turning of TC11 titanium alloy. Materials (Basel). 2016;9(10):804.
   Google Scholar
• Patil DK, Sawant SM. A parametric study on performance of titanium alloy using coated and uncoated carbide insert in CNC turning. International Journal of Advanced Mechanical Engineering.2014;5:557–564.
   Google Scholar
• Lin ZC, Ho CY. Analysis and application of grey relation and ANOVA in chemical-mechanical polishing process parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2003;21(1):10–14.
   Google Scholar
• de Myttenaere A, Golden B, Le Grand B, et al. Mean absolute percentage error for regression models. Neurocomputing. 2016;192:38–48.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd G, Na D, Li Z, et al. Influent forecasting for wastewater treatment plants in North America. Sustain. 2019;11(6):1764.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta MK, Mia M, Pruncu CI, et al. Modeling and performance evaluation of Al2O3, MoS2 and graphite nanoparticle-assisted MQL in turning titanium alloy: an intelligent approach. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2020;42. DOI:10.1007/s40430-020-2256-z.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong Y, Wu J, Deng C, et al. Machining process parameters optimization for heavy-duty CNC machine tools in sustainable manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;87(5–8):1237–1246.
   Google Scholar
• Abubakr M, Abbas AT, Tomaz I, et al. Sustainable and smart manufacturing: an integrated approach. Sustain. 2020;12(6):2280.
   Google Scholar
• Amrita M, Rukmini Srikant R, Venkataramana VSN. Optimisation of cutting parameters for cutting temperature and tool wear in turning AISI4140 under different cooling conditions. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2020. DOI:10.1080/2374068X.2020.1795794
   Google Scholar
• Ola OT, Valdez RL, Oluwasegun KM, et al. Process variable optimization in the cold metal transfer weld repair of aerospace ZE41A-T5 alloy using central composite design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;105(11):4827–4835.
   Google Scholar