A path analysis-based approach for parametric study of an electrochemical machining process

References

• Rajurkar KP, Sundaram MM, Malshe AP. Review of electrochemical and electrodischarge machining. Procedia CIRP. 2013;6:13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya B. Electrochemical micromachining for nanofabrication, MEMS and nanotechnology. Oxford, MA; Elsevier. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Wang Y. Electrochemical machining of complex components of aero-engines: developments, trends, and technological advances. Chin J Aeronaut. 2019. DOI:10.1016/j.cja.2019.09.016
   Google Scholar
• Jain NK, Jain VK. Optimization of electro-chemical machining process parameters using genetic algorithms. Mach Sci Technol. 2007;11(2):235–258.
   Google Scholar
• Klocke F, Zeis M, Klink A. Technological and economical capabilities of manufacturing titanium- and nickel-based alloys via electrochemical machining (ECM). Key Eng Mater. 2012;504-506:1237–1242.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Ji H, Liu H. Machining parameter optimization of aero-engine blade in electrochemical machining based on BP neural network. Adv Mater Res. 2010;121-122:893–899.
   Google Scholar
• Chavoshi SZ. Analysis and predictive modeling of performance parameters in electrochemical drilling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2011;53(9–12):1081–1101.
   Google Scholar
• Nayak KC. Taguchi integrated least square support vector machine an alternative to artificial neural network analysis of electrochemical machining process. IOSR J Mech Civil Eng. 2012;1(3):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee R, Chakraborty S. Selection of the optimal electrochemical machining process parameters using biogeography-based optimization algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2013;64:781–791.
   Google Scholar
• Senthilkumar C, Ganesan G, Karthikeyan R. Optimisation of ECM parameters using RSM and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA II). Int J Mach Mach Mater. 2013;14(1):77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Dhobe SD, Doloi B, Bhattacharyya B. Optimisation of ECM process during machining of titanium using quality loss function. Int J Manuf Technol Manage. 2014;28(1/2/3):19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty A, Talla G, Dewangan S, et al. Microstructural investigation and multi response optimisation using fuzzy-TOPSIS during the electrochemical machining of Inconel 825. Int J Precis Technol. 2015;5(3/4):201–216.
   Google Scholar
• Rao SR, Padmanabhan G. Parametric optimization in electrochemical machining using utility based Taguchi method. J Eng Sci Technol. 2015;10:81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Sathiyamoorthy V, Sekar T. Optimisation of processing parameters in ECM of AISI 202 using multi objective genetic algorithm. Int J Enterprise Network Manag. 2016;7(2):133–141.
   Google Scholar
• Sohrabpoor H, Khanghah SP, Shahraki S, et al. Multi-objective optimization of electrochemical machining process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;82(9–12):1683–1692.
   Google Scholar
• Ayyappan S, Sivakumar K. Enhancing the performance of electrochemical machining of 20MnCr5 alloy steel and optimization of process parameters by PSO-DF optimizer. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;82(9–12):2053–2064.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrvar A, Basti A, Jamali A Optimization of electrochemical machining process parameters: combining response surface methodology and differential evolution algorithm. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering. Sage Publications. 2017; 231: 1114–1126
   Google Scholar
• Manikandan N, Kumanan S, Sathiyanarayanan C. Multiple performance optimization of electrochemical drilling of Inconel 625 using Taguchi based grey relational analysis. Eng Sci Technol Int J. 2017;20(2):662–671.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty S, Das PP, Kumar V. Application of grey-fuzzy logic technique for parametric optimization of non-traditional machining processes. Grey Systems Theory Appl. 2018;8(1):46–68.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal S, Dandge SS, Chakraborty S. Development of association rules to study the parametric influences in non-traditional machining processes. Sādhanā. 2019;44(11):230.
   Google Scholar
• Panda SN, Bagal DK, Pattanaik AK, et al. Comparative evaluation for studying the parametric influences on quality of electrode using Taguchi method coupled with MOORA, DFA, and TOPSIS method for electrochemical machining. In: Parwani A, Ramkumar P, editors. Recent Advances in Mechanical Infrastructure. Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure. Singapore: Springer; 2020;115-129.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrvar A, Basti A, Jamali A Inverse modelling of electrochemical machining process using a novel combination of soft computing methods. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. Sage Publications. 2020; 10.1177/0954406220916495
   Google Scholar
• Acherjee B, Maity D, Kuar AS. Optimization of correlated and conflicting responses of ECM process using flower pollination algorithm. Int J Appl Metaheuristic Comput. 2020;11(4):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Heshmatabad RR, Shabgard M. Machining of 304 stainless steel using electrochemical machining (ECM) process: response surface methodology approach. Int J Indust Engineer Product Res. 2020;31(3):397–407.
   Google Scholar
• Stage FK, Carter HC, Nora A. Path analysis: an introduction and analysis of a decade of research. J Edu Res. 2004;98(1):5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL. Finding our way: an introduction to path analysis. Can J Psychiatry. 2005;50(2):115–122.
   Google Scholar
• Huang X, Li B, Yu F, et al. Path analysis from physical activity to quality of life among dementia patients: a dual-path mediating model. J Adv Nurs. 2020;76(2):546–554.
   Google Scholar
• Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Lei P-W WQ. Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling. In: Hoyle RH, editor. Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press; 2012:164-180.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen KA, Curran PJ. Latent curve models: a structural equation perspective. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bozdogan H. Model selection and Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC): the general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika. 1987;52(3):345–370.
   Google Scholar
• Khan IA, Rani M, Deb RK, et al. Effect on material removal rate and surface finish in ECM process when machining stainless steel-316 with Cu electrode. Int J Recent Technol Engineer. 2019;8(4):2933–2941.
   Google Scholar