References
- Rosso M. Ceramic and metal matrix composites: routes and properties. J Mater Process Tech. 2006;1175:364–375.
- Torralba JM, Da Costa CE, Velasco F. P/M aluminum matrix composites: an overview. J Mat Proc Technol. 2003;133:203–206.
- Gupta P, Kumar D, Parkash O, et al. Structural and mechanical behaviour of 5% Al2O3-reinforced Fe metal matrix composites (MMCs) produced by powder metallurgy (P/M) route. Bull Mater Sci. 2013;36:859–868.
- Kim JM, Park JS, Yun HS. Microstructure and mechanical properties of TiC nanoparticle-reinforced Iron-matrix composites. Streng Mater. 2014;46:177–182.
- Jha P, Gupta P, Kumar D, et al. Synthesis and characterization of Fe–ZrO2 metal matrix composites. J Compo Mat. 2014;48(17):2107–2115.
- Pagounis E, Talvitie M, Lindroos VK. Influence of the metal/ceramic interface on the microstructure and mechanical properties of HIPed iron-based composites. Comp Sci Technol. 1996;56:1329–1337.
- Parveez B, Wani MF. Tribological behaviour of nano-zirconia reinforced iron-based self-lubricating composites for bearing applications. Tribol Int. 2021;159:106969.
- Jiru MG, Sinha DK, Beri H. Mathematical modelling and optimization of laser beam parameters on microhardness and surface scratch resistance of Al-TiZn alloy. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2021. DOI:10.1080/2374068X.2020.1860502
- Kumar GS, Reddy BV, Sankaraiah G, et al. Modeling the performance of vortex tube using response surface methodology and artificial neural networks. Mat Scie Eng. 2018;390:1–6.
- Reddy PV, Prasad PR, Krishnudu DM, et al. An investigation on mechanical and wear characteristics of Al 6063/TiC metal matrix composites Using RSM. J Bio Tribo-Corr. 2019;5:90.
- Kundu J, Singh H. Modelling and analysis of process parameters in friction stir welding of AA5083-H321 using response surface methodology. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2017;4(2):183–199.
- Prasad PR, Prakash JN, Manjunath LH, et al. Physical and wear properties of UHMWPE fabric reinforced epoxy composites. Int J Auto Mech Eng. 2020;17:7577–7586.
- Suresh S, Shenbaga N, Moorthi V, et al. Mechanical behavior and wear prediction of stir cast Al–TiB2 composites using response surface methodology. Mater Des. 2014;59:383–396.
- Niranjan K, Lakshminarayanan PR. Optimization of process parameters for in situ casting of Al/TiB2composites through response surface methodology. Trans Nonfer Met Soc China. 2013;23:1269–1274.
- Yigezu BS, Mahapatra MM, Jha PK. On modeling the abrasive wear characteristics of in situ Al-12%Si/TiC composites. Mater Des. 2013;50:277–284.
- Jha P, Gautam RK, Tyagi R. Modeling the dry sliding wear behavior of Cu-4wt%Ni-TiC composites using response surface methodology. Mater Tod Proce. 2018;5:4692–4701.
- Popescu IN, Ghita C, Bratu V. Tribological behaviour and statistical experimental design of sintered iron–copper based composites. App Sur Sci. 2013;285P:72–85.
- Li J, Peng J, Guo S, et al. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of sintering process for the preparation of magnesia partially stabilized zirconia (Mg-PSZ) using natural baddeleyite as starting material. Cera Inter. 2013;39:197–202.
- Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. New York: Wiley; 1997.
- Saravanan I, Perumal AE, Vettivel SC, et al. Optimizing wear behavior of TiN coated SS 316L against Ti alloy using response surface methodology. Mater Des. 2015;67:469–482.
- Chang BP, Akil HM, Affendy MG, et al. Comparative study of wear performance of particulate and fiber-reinforced nano-ZnO/ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene hybrid composites using response surface methodology. Mater Des. 2014;63:805–819.