Review of cooling techniques used in metal cutting processes

References

• Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST. Environmentally conscious machining of difficult-to-machine materials with regard to cutting fluids. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2012;57:83–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider J, Hashmi MSJ. Health and environmental impacts in metal machining processes, comprehensive materials processing. Elsevier; 2014. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-096532-1.00804-9.
   Google Scholar
• Byers JP. Metalworking Fluids edited by. 2nd ed. LLC Boca Raton FL: Taylor & Francis Group; 2006. p. 33487–2742.
   Google Scholar
• Sampaio, M.A., Machado, Á.R., Laurindo, C.A.H., Torres, R.D., Amorim, F.L. Influence of minimum quantity of lubrication (MQL) when turning hardened SAE 1045 steel: a comparison with dry machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;98:959–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MA, Jaffery SHI, Khan M, et al. Multi-objective optimization of turning titanium-based alloy Ti-6Al-4V under dry, wet, and cryogenic conditions using gray relational analysis (GRA). Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2020;106:3897–3911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishawy HA, Hosseini A, Principles B. Machining difficult-to-cut materials. In: Springer nature Switzerland AG, gewerbestrasse. Vol. 11. Cham Switzerland; 2019. p. 6330.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta MK, Sood PK, Singh G, et al. Sustainable machining of aerospace material – ti (grade-2) alloy: modeling and optimization. J Clean Prod. 2017;147:614–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Singh RC, Singari RM. Effect of direct LN2 single jet supply during turning of AISI D3 steel alloy using an optimization technique. Mater Res Express. 2019;6:96548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh P, Padhy CP. Influence of nano (h-BN) cutting fluid on machinability of Inconel 625. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1355:012033.
   Google Scholar
• Sarikaya M, Güllü A. Multi-response optimization of minimum quantity lubrication parameters using Taguchi-based grey relational analysis in turning of difficult-to-cut alloy Haynes 25. J Clean Prod. 2015;91:347–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatha SS, Pal A, Singh T. Performance evaluation of aluminium 6063 drilling under the influence of nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. J Clean Prod. 2016;137:537–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar NR, Khan MMA. Effects of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) by vegetable oil-based cutting fluid on machinability of AISI 9310 steel. Int J Mach Mach Mater. 2010;7:17–38.
   Google Scholar
• Debnath S, Reddy MM, Yi QS. Environmental friendly cutting fluids and cooling techniques in machining: a review. J Clean Prod. 2014;83:33–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh R, Bajpai V. Handbook of manufacturing engineering and technology. 2013. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4471-4976-7.
   Google Scholar
• Benedicto E, Carou D, Rubio EM. Technical, economic and environmental review of the lubrication/cooling systems used in machining processes. Procedia Eng. 2017;184:99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Krolczyk GM, Maruda RW, Krolczyk JB, et al. Ecological trends in machining as a key factor in sustainable production – a review. J Clean Prod. 2019;218:601–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criado V, Díaz-Álvarez J, Cantero JL, et al. Study of the performance of PCBN and carbide tools in finishing machining of Inconel 718 with cutting fluid at conventional pressures. Procedia CIRP. 2018;77:634–637.
   Google Scholar
• Vishnu AV, Kumar PJ, Ramana MV. Comparison among dry, flooded and MQL conditions in machining of en 353 steel alloys-an experimental investigation. Mater Today Proc. 2018;5:24954–24962.
   Google Scholar
• Ezugwu EO, Bonney J. Finish machining of nickel-base inconel 718 alloy with coated carbide tool under conventional and high-pressure coolant supplies. Tribol Trans. 2005;48:76–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezugwu EO, Bonney J, Da Silva RB, et al. Surface integrity of finished turned Ti-6Al-4V alloy with PCD tools using conventional and high pressure coolant supplies. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2007;47:884–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaynak Y, Gharibi A, Yılmaz U, et al. A comparison of flood cooling, minimum quantity lubrication and high pressure coolant on machining and surface integrity of titanium Ti-5553 alloy. J Manuf Process. 2018;34:503–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshpande S, Deshpande Y. A review on cooling systems used in machining processes. Mater Today Proc. 2019;18:5019–5031.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz M, Dado M, Hnilica R, et al. Environmental and health aspects of metalworking fluid use. Polish J Environ Stud. 2015;24:37–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devillez A, Schneider F, Dominiak S, et al. Cutting forces and wear in dry machining of Inconel 718 with coated carbide tools. Wear. 2007;262:931–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouari M, List G, Girot F, et al. Experimental analysis and optimisation of tool wear in dry machining of aluminium alloys. Wear. 2003;255:1359–1368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafai NH, Islam MN. Comparison of dry and flood turning in terms of quality of turned parts. WCE 2010 - world congr. Eng. 2010;2010(3):2044–2049.
   Google Scholar
• Senevirathne SWMAI, Punchihewa HKG. Comparison of tool life and surface roughness with MQL, flood cooling, and dry cutting conditions with P20 and D2 steel. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2017;244:012006.
   Google Scholar
• Shashidhara YM, Jayaram SR. Vegetable oils as a potential cutting fluid-An evolution. Tribol Int. 2010;43:1073–1081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuram E, Ozcelik B, Demirbas E. 2013. Green manufacturing processes and systems. 1st ed. Berlin Heidelberg Gebze-Kocaeli Turkey: Springer-Verlag; DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-33792-5
   Google Scholar
• de Paula MA, Ribeiro MV, Souza JVC, et al. Analysis of the performance of coated carbide cutting tools in the machining of martensitic stainless steel aisi 410 in dry and mql conditions. Nanotechnology. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira O, Martín-Alfonso JE, Rodríguez A, et al. Sustainability analysis of lubricant oils for minimum quantity lubrication based on their tribo-rheological performance. J Clean Prod. 2017;164:1419–1429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson DA, Agapiou JSA. Metal cutting theory and practice. 3rd ed. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group; 2016. p. 33487–2742.
   Google Scholar
• Qin S, Li Z, Guo G, et al. Analysis of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) for different coating tools during turning of TC11 titanium alloy. Materials (Basel). 2016;9:804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatri A, Jahan MP. Investigating tool wear mechanisms in machining of Ti-6Al-4V in flood coolant, dry and MQL conditions. Procedia Manuf. 2018;26:434–445.
   Google Scholar
• Mathonsi TN, Laubscher RF, Gupta K. On machinability of titanium grade 4 under minimum quantity lubrication assisted high speed machining. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2018;430. DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/430/1/012013
   Google Scholar
• Rahman SS, Ashraf MZI, Amin AN, et al. Tuning nanofluids for improved lubrication performance in turning biomedical grade titanium alloy. J Clean Prod. 2019;206:180–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raj A, Wins KLD, Varadarajan AS. Comparison of surface roughness and chip characteristics obtained under different modes of lubrication during hard turning of AISI H13 tool work steel. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2016;149. DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/149/1/012017
   Google Scholar
• Raj A, Wins KLD, Varadarajan AS. Evaluation of the performance during hard turning of OHNS steel with minimal cutting fluid application and its comparison with minimum quantity lubrication. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2016;149. DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/149/1/012021
   Google Scholar
• Tamang SK, Chandrasekaran M, Palanikumar K, et al. Machining performance optimisation of mql-assisted turning of inconel-825 superalloy using ga for industrial applications. Int J Mach Mach Mater. 2019;21:43–64.
   Google Scholar
• Ekinovi E, Begovi E, Prcanovi H. MQL machining of difficult to cut materials. In: Trends in the development of machinery and associated technology. Istanbul (Turkey); 2013. p. 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Sarıkaya M, Yılmaz V, Güllü A. Analysis of cutting parameters and cooling/lubrication methods for sustainable machining in turning of Haynes 25 superalloy. J Clean Prod. 2016;133:172–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamaludin AS, Hosokawa A, Furumoto T, et al. Study on the effectiveness of extreme cold mist MQL system on turning process of stainless steel AISI 316. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2018;319. DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/319/1/012054
   Google Scholar
• Maruda RW, Krolczyk GM, Feldshtein E, et al. A study on droplets sizes, their distribution and heat exchange for minimum quantity cooling lubrication (MQCL). Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2016;100:81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatade VT, Patil VT, Kuppan P, et al. Experimental investigation of machining parameter under {MQL} milling of {SS}304. {IOP} Conf. Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2016;149:12023.
   Google Scholar
• Gajrani KK, Suvin PS, Kailas SV, et al. Hard machining performance of indigenously developed green cutting fluid using flood cooling and minimum quantity cutting fluid. J Clean Prod. 2019;206:108–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma J, Sidhu BS. Investigation of effects of dry and near dry machining on AISI D2 steel using vegetable oil. J Clean Prod. 2014;66:619–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennison MS, Sivaram NM, Barik D, et al. Turning operation of AISI 4340 steel in flooded, near-dry and dry conditions: a comparative study on tool-work interface temperature. Mech Mech Eng. 2019;23:172–182.
   Google Scholar
• Minh Duc T, Long TT. Investigation of MQL-employed hard-milling process of S60C steel using coated-cemented carbide tools. J Mech Eng Autom. 2016;6:128–132.
   Google Scholar
• Ulutan D, Özel T. Hard machining. Mod Manuf Process. 2019;309–321. DOI:10.1002/9781119120384.ch13
   Google Scholar
• Amiril SAS, Rahim EA, Hishamudin AZ. Effect of nozzle distance and cutting parameters on MQL machining of AISI 1045. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1150. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1150/1/012045
   Google Scholar
• Abellan-Nebot JV, Rogero MO. Sustainable machining of molds for tile industry by minimum quantity lubrication. J Clean Prod. 2019;240:118082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ghamdi KA, Iqbal A. A sustainability comparison between conventional and high-speed machining. J Clean Prod. 2015;108:192–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Chandra V, Kumar P. Assessment of machining parameters on EN-24 steel under dry, wet and MQL condition using multi coated inserts. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1240:012141.
   Google Scholar
• Hassanpour H, Sadeghi MH, Rasti A, et al. Investigation of surface roughness, microhardness and white layer thickness in hard milling of AISI 4340 using minimum quantity lubrication. J Clean Prod. 2016;120:124–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokoohi Y, Khosrojerdi E, Rassolian Shiadhi BH. Machining and ecological effects of a new developed cutting fluid in combination with different cooling techniques on turning operation. J Clean Prod. 2015;94:330–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beliu I, Tamaag I. Effect of cooling condition over surface quality in turning of aluminium alloy 6082-T6. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2019;564. DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/564/1/012009
   Google Scholar
• Chirita B, Tampu NC, Brabie G, et al. Experimental investigation on the effects of cooling system on surface quality in high speed milling of an aluminium alloy. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2016;145. DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/145/2/022006
   Google Scholar
• Dasch JM, Kurgin SK. A characterisation of mist generated from minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) compared to wet machining. Int J Mach Mach Mater. 2010;7:82–95.
   Google Scholar
• Sundara Murthy K, Rajendran I. A study on optimisation of cutting parameters and prediction of surface roughness in end milling of aluminium under MQL machining. Int J Mach Mach Mater. 2010;7:112–128.
   Google Scholar
• Fratila D, Caizar C. Application of Taguchi method to selection of optimal lubrication and cutting conditions in face milling of AlMg3. J Clean Prod. 2011;19:640–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadad M, Sadeghi B. Minimum quantity lubrication-MQL turning of AISI 4140 steel alloy. J Clean Prod. 2013;54:332–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang P, Li H, Zhu WL, et al. Effects of eco-friendly cooling strategy on machining performance in micro-scale diamond turning of Ti–6Al–4V. J Clean Prod. 2020;243:118526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong SY, Ding Y, Jeong WC. Friction and cutting forces in cryogenic machining of Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2001;41:2271–2285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZY, Rajurkar KP. Cryogenic machining of hard-to-cut materials. Wear. 2000;239:168–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusavec F, Deshpande A, Yang S, et al. Sustainable machining of high temperature Nickel alloy - Inconel 718: part 1 - Predictive performance models. J Clean Prod. 2014;81:255–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giasin K, Ayvar-Soberanis S, Hodzic A. Evaluation of cryogenic cooling and minimum quantity lubrication effects on machining GLARE laminates using design of experiments. J Clean Prod. 2016;135:533–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira O, Rodríguez A, Fernández-Abia AI, et al. Cryogenic and minimum quantity lubrication for an eco-efficiency turning of AISI 304. J Clean Prod. 2016;139:440–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyan Kumar KVBS, Choudhury SK. Investigation of tool wear and cutting force in cryogenic machining using design of experiments. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;203:95–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane SN, Mishra A, Dutta AK. Preface: international conference on recent trends in physics (ICRTP 2016). J Phys Conf Ser. 2016;755. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001.
   Google Scholar
• Nalbant M, Yildiz Y. Effect of cryogenic cooling in milling process of AISI 304 stainless steel. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2011;21:72–79. English Ed.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivaiah P, Chakradhar D. Effect of cryogenic coolant on turning performance characteristics during machining of 17-4 PH stainless steel: a comparison with MQL, wet, dry machining. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol. 2018;21:86–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul S, Dhar NR, Chattopadhyay AB. Beneficial effects of cryogenic cooling over dry and wet machining on tool wear and surface finish in turning AISI 1060 steel. J Mater Process Technol. 2001;116:44–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun S, Brandt M, Dargusch MS. Machining Ti-6Al-4V alloy with cryogenic compressed air cooling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2010;50:933–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Y, He N, Li L, et al. Refrigerated cooling air cutting of difficult-to-cut materials. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2007;47:927–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mia M, Singh GR, Gupta MK, et al. Influence of Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube and nitrogen gas assisted MQL in precision turning of Al 6061-T6. Precis Eng. 2018;53:289–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsayyed B, Hamdan MO, Aldajah S. Vortex tube impact on cooling milling machining. ASME Int Mech Eng Congr Expo Proc. 2012;3:773–776.
   Google Scholar
• Yüksel S, Onat A. Investigation of CNC tuning parameters by using a vortex tube cooling system. Acta Phys Pol A. 2015;127:881–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann H. New hard/lubricant coating for dry machining k. Wear. 1999;113:286–292.
   Google Scholar
• Tosun N, Rostam S, RASUL S. Use of nano cutting fluid in machining 17–21. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ali MAM, Khalil ANM, Azmi AI. Effect of Al2O3 nanolubrication with Sodium Dodecylbenzene Sulfonate (SDBS] on surface roughness and tool wear under MQL during turning of Ti-6AL-4T. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2016;114. DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/114/1/012110
   Google Scholar
• Sayuti M, Sarhan AAD, Salem F. Novel uses of SiO2 nano-lubrication system in hard turning process of hardened steel AISI4140 for less tool wear, surface roughness and oil consumption. J Clean Prod. 2014;67:265–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma P, Sidhu BS, Sharma J. Investigation of effects of nanofluids on turning of AISI D2 steel using minimum quantity lubrication. J Clean Prod. 2015;108:72–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najiha MS, Rahman MM, Kadirgama K. 2016. Performance of water-based TiO2 nanofluid during the minimum quantity lubrication machining of aluminium alloy, AA6061-T6. J Clean Prod. Elsevier Ltd. 135. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooi ME, Sayuti M, Sarhan AAD. Fuzzy logic-based approach to investigate the novel uses of nano suspended lubrication in precise machining of aerospace AL tempered grade 6061. J Clean Prod. 2015;89:286–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pragat Singh JSD, Singh H, Bhatti MS. Performance evaluation of coated carbide tool during face milling of AISI 304 under different cutting environments. Mater Res, 2019; Express 6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahboob Ali MA, Azmi AI, Mohd Zain MZ, et al. New bio-based nanolubricants for turning of Inconel 718 towards improvement of tool wear resistance and specific cutting energy. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2019;670. DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/670/1/012007
   Google Scholar
• Garg A, Sarma S, Panda BN, et al. Study of effect of nanofluid concentration on response characteristics of machining process for cleaner production. J Clean Prod. 2016;135:476–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar