Fabrication and mechanical characterisation of composite sandwich structure having kevlar honeycomb core

References

• Kilanko O, Babaremu KO, Fayomi OSI, et al. Overview of composite materials from green products in mechanical application. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2021;655(1):012043.
   Google Scholar
• Inegbenebor AO, Bolu CA, Babalola PO, et al. Aluminium silicon carbide particulate metal matrix composite development via stir casting processing. Silicon. 2018;10(2):343–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barile C, Casavola C, De Cillis F. Mechanical comparison of new composite materials for aerospace applications. Composites. 2019;162:122–128.
   Google Scholar
• Zangana S, Epaarachchi J, Ferdous W, et al. Behaviour of continuous fibre composite sandwich core under low-velocity impact. Thin Walled Struct. 2021;158:107157.
   Google Scholar
• Aminanda Y, Castanié B, Barrau JJ, et al. Experimental and numerical study of compression after the impact of sandwich structures with metallic skins. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69:50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Williams HR, Trask RS, Bond IP. Self-healing sandwich panels: restoration of compressive strength after impact. Compos Sci Technol. 2008;68:3171–3177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadley HNG, O’masta MR, Dharmasena KP, et al. Zok FW.Effect of core topology on projectile penetration in hybrid aluminium/alumina sandwich structures. Int J Impact Eng. 2013;62:99–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyvazian A, Najafian S, Mozafari H, et al. Crashworthiness analysis of a novel aluminium bi-tubular corrugated tube—an experimental study. In: Advances in manufacturing processes. Springer; 2019. pp. 599–607.
   Google Scholar
• Hou S, Zhao S, Ren L, et al. Crashworthiness optimization of corrugated sandwich panels. Mater Des. 2013;51:1071–1084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozafari H, Khatami S, Molatefi H. Out of plane crushing and local stiffness determination of proposed foam filled sandwich panel for Korean tilting train express– a numerical study. Mater Des. 2015;66:400–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susainathan J, Eyma F, De Luycker E, et al. Experimental investigation of impact behaviour of wood-based sandwich structures. Compos Part A. 2018;109:10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swolfs Y, Verpoest I, Gorbatikh L. Recent advances in fibre-hybrid composites: materials selection, opportunities and applications. Int Mater Rev. 2019;64(4):181–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangana S, Epaarachchi J, Ferdous W, et al. A novel hybridised composite sandwich core with glass, Kevlar and Zylon fibres–investigation under low-velocity impact. Int J Impact Eng. 2020;137:103430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammad A, Rahman MR, Baini R, Bakri MK. Applications of sustainable polymer composites in automobile and aerospace industry. Advances in sustainable polymer composites. United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing; 2021; pp. 185–207.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Angra S, Chanda AK. Analysis of the effects of varying core thicknesses of Kevlar honeycomb sandwich structures under different regimes of testing. Mater Today Proc. 2020;21:1615–1623.
   Google Scholar
• Shabani M, Xiong W. Metal matrix composite development using binder jet additive manufacturing. Metal-matrix composites. Cham: Springer; 2022. pp. 215–223.
   Google Scholar
• Vamja DG, Tejani GG. Experimental test on sandwich panel composite material. Int J Innovative Res Sci Eng Technol. 2(7):3047–3054. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1067.3018&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Khan A, Kumar Saxena K. A review on the enhancement of mechanical properties of fibre-reinforced polymer composite under different loading rates. Mater Today Proc. 2022;56:2316–2322.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla KK. Composite materials. 4th ed. 2019. DOI:10.1007/978-0-387-74365-3
   Google Scholar
• Çetin ME. Fabrication, characterization and mechanical testing of carbon fibre sandwich composites with nanoparticle-included polyurethane adhesives. J Compos Mater. 2021;56:00219983211058801.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Ji Y, Hu Y, Hu X, Ren Y. Interfacial design and flexural property of CFRP/aluminium-honeycomb sandwich with Aramid-pulp micro/nano-fibre interlays. Compos Struct. 2022;289:115486.
   Google Scholar
• Ashraf W, Ishak MR, Zuhri MYM, et al. Investigation of different face sheet materials on compression properties of honeycomb sandwich composite. Seminar Enau Kebangsaan. 2019;1:129–132.
   Google Scholar
• Li MJ. Experimental study on mechanical properties of the sandwich composite structure reinforced by basalt fiber and nomex honeycomb. Materials. 2020;13:1870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivaram AR, Manikandan N, Krishnakumar SK, Rajavel R, Krishnamohan S, Vijayaganth G. Experimental study on aluminium based sandwich composite with polypropylene foam sheet. Mater Today Proc. 2020;24:746–753.
   Google Scholar
• Herranen H, Pabut O, Eerme M, et al. Design and testing of sandwich structures with different core materials. Mater Sci. 2012;18(1):45–50. DOI:10.5755/j01.ms.18.1.1340
   Google Scholar
• Quilter A. Composites in aerospace applications. IHS White Paper. 2001;444(1):264.
   Google Scholar
• Bi GJ, Yin JP, Wang ZJ, et al. Impact resistance analysis of a composite double-layer honeycomb sandwich structure. Strength Mater. 2021;53:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Jedral A. Review of testing methods dedicated for sandwich structures with honeycomb core. Trans Aerospace Res. 2019;2(255):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Chanda AK, Angra S. Numerical modelling and validation of a composite sandwich structure having non-metallic material as a core. Solid State Technology. 2020;63(4):2742–2752. DOI:10.5109/4742119
   Google Scholar
• Yoke-Chin C. Weight estimation of composite secondary structure. 24th international congress of the aeronautical sciences. DOI:10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0340
   Google Scholar
• Arbaoui J, Schmitt Y, Royer F. Effect of core thickness and intermediate layers on mechanical properties of polypropylene honeycomb multi-layer sandwich structures. Arch Metall Mater. 2014;59(1):11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Kumar Chanda A, Angra S. Numerical modelling of a composite sandwich structure having non-metallic honeycomb core. 8:759–767. DOI:10.5109/4742119
   Google Scholar
• Olita S, Diomedi M, Ciampa D. Alternative formula for rigid pavement stress calculation in corner load conditions. Balt J Road Bridge Eng. 2020;15(5):59–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarvestani YH, Akbarzadeh AH, Mirbolghasemi A, Hermenean K. 3D printed meta-sandwich structures: failure mechanism, energy absorption and multi-hit capability. Mater Des. 2018;160:179–193.
   Google Scholar
• Anil K, Angra S, Chanda AK. Analysis of the effects of varying core thicknesses of Kevlar honeycomb sandwich structures under different regimes of testing. Mater Today Proc. 2020;21:1615–1623.
   Google Scholar