Prediction of surface roughness when maching mild steel using statistical methods

References

• Sahin Y, Motorcu AR: Prediction of surface roughness in machining of carbon steel by CVD coated cutting tools, Ghosh S, Castro IC and Lee JK editors. Proceedings of 8th Int. Confer on Numer Methods in Industrial Forming Processes, Ohio State University, Materials Processing Design: Modelling, Simulations and Applications, NUMIFORM2004, American Institute of Physics; (No. CP712), USA. 2004. p. 1414–1419. DOI:10.1063/1.1766727
   Google Scholar
• Feng CX, Wang X. Development of empirical models for surface roughness prediction in finish turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2002;20(5):348–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin Y, Motorcu AR. A model for surface roughness in turning AISI 4140 steel using coated carbide cutting tools, In: Akkök M, Erden A, Kılıc E, Konukseven EI, and Tönük E, editors. 11th Int Confer on Mach Des Prod. Antalya, Turkey; 2004b. p. 1–10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281865348
   Google Scholar
• Mır M, Wani M. Modelling and analysis of tool wear and surface roughness in hard turning of AISI D2 steel using response surface methodology. Int Journal Indust Eng Comput. 2018;9(5):63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Asılturk I, Akkuş H. Determining the effect of cutting parameters on surface roughness in hard turning using the Taguchi method. Measurement. 2011;44(9):1697–1704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavak N, Üstel N. The investigation of surface roughness on AISI 1040 steel with dry turning. Karaelmas Sci Eng Journal. 2012;2(2):24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Nalbant M, Gökkaya H, Sur G. Application of Taguchi method in the optimization of cutting parameters for surface roughness in turning. Mater Des. 2007;28(4):1379–1385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta MK, Singh G, Sood PK. Experimental investigation of machining AISI 1040 medium carbon steel under cryogenic machining: a comparison with dry machining. J Inst Eng India Ser C. 2015;96(4):373–379.
   Google Scholar
• Yaka H, Uğur L, Akkuş H. Investigation of surface roughness with multiple regression in turning of AISI 1040 Steel. AKU J Sci Eng. 2016;16(035901):770–775.
   Google Scholar
• Wang JJ, Zheng M On the machining characteristics of H13 tool steel in different hardness states in ball end milling. The Int J of Adv Manufac Technol. 2003;22(11):855–863. DOI:10.1007/s00170-003-1663-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P J. Davim: a note on the determination of optimal cutting conditions for surface finish obtained in turning using design of experiments. J Mater Process Technol. 2001;116(2–3):305–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh R, Basavarajappa S, Gaitonde VN, et al. Machinability investigations on hardened AISI 4340 steel using coated carbide insert. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater. 2012;33:75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopac J, Bahor M, Sokovic M. Optimal machining parameters for achieving the desired surface roughness in fine turning cold pre-formed steel work processing. Int MachTools Manuf. 2002;42(6):707–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fnides B, Yallese MA, Mabrouki T, et al. Surface roughness model in turning hardened hot work steel using mixed ceramic tool. Mechanika. 2009;77(3):68–73.
   Google Scholar
• Elbah M, Yallese MA, Aouici H, et al. Comparative assessment of wiper and conventional ceramic tools on surface roughness in hard turning AISI 4140 steel. Measurement. 2013;46(9):3041–3056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnfir OA, Olufayo OAM, Jomaa W, et al. Machinability study of hardened 1045 steel when milling with ceramic cutting inserts. Materials (MDPI). 2019;12(23):3974–3981. DOI:10.3390/ma12233974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motorcu AR. Surface roughness evaluation when machining carbon steel with ceramic cutting tools. Uludağ Universitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009;14(1):139–145.
   Google Scholar
• Motorcu AR, Şahin Y. Sertleştirilmiş düşük karbonlu AISI 1040 çeliğinin farklı geometrili takımlar ile işlenebilirliğin modellenmesi, IATS 2005. In: Acaroglu M, Ünüvar A, Altun AA, Örnek MN, editors. 4th International Advanced Technologies Symposium. Cılt 1-2 ed. Konya, Turkey; 2005. p. 853–859.
   Google Scholar
• Chou YK, Song H Tool nose radius effects on finish hard turning. J Maters Process Technol. 2004;148(2):259–268. DOI:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.10.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makadia AJ, Nanavati JI. Optimization of machining factors for turning processes based on the response surface methodology. Measurement. 2013;46(4):1521–1529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranganath MS, Vipin H. Effect of rake angle on surface roughness in CNC turning. Int J of Adv Res Innov. 2014;2(2):522–530. Corpus ID: 110156684. DOI:10.51976/ijari.221420
   Google Scholar
• Natara JM, Nagarajan N. Effect of cutting tool nose radius on surface roughness by using response surface methodology. J Balkan Tribol Assoc. 2019;25(1):224–235.
   Google Scholar
• Ranganath MS, Vipin H. Surface roughness prediction model for CNC turning of EN-8 using response surface methodology. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng. 2015;5(6):135–143.
   Google Scholar
• Taha Z, Lelana HK, Aoyama H: Effect of insert geometry on surface roughness in the turning process of AISI D2 steel , APIEMS. ed. 11th Asia Pasific indust eng man system, Melaka, Malezya, Universiti Malaya (UM) and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM). 2010: pp. 1–6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321765930
   Google Scholar
• Singh D, Chadha V, Singari RM Effect of nose radius on surface roughness during CNC turning using response surface methodology. Int J Recent Adv in Mech Eng (IJMECH). 2016;5(2):31–45 DOI:10.14810/ijmech.2016.520331
   Google Scholar
• Liu M, Takagi JI, Tsukuda A. Effect of tool nose radius and tool wear on residual stress distribution in hard turning of bearing steel. J Mater Process Technol. 2004;150(3):234–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karayel D. Prediction and control of surface roughness in CNC lathe using artificial neural network. J Mater Process Technol. 2009;209(7):3125–3313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neseli S, Tasdemir S, Yaldız S. With artificial neural network approach to predict surface roughness in turning. J Eng Arch Faculty of Eskisehir Osmangazi University. 2009;2(3):65–75.
   Google Scholar
• Davim JP, Gaitonde VN, Karnık SR. Investigations into the effect of cutting conditions on surface roughness in turning of free machining steel (9smnpb28k-DIN) by ANN models. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;205(1–3):16–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajeev D, Dinakaran D, Muthuraman S: Prediction of roughness in hard turning of AISI 4140 steel through artificial neural network and regression models, Int J Mech Eng Technol (IJMET). 2016;7(5): 200–208. Article ID: IJMET-07-05-022.
   Google Scholar
• Chavoshı SZ, Tajdarı M. Surface roughness modelling in hard turning operation of AISI 4140 using CBN cutting tool. Int J Mater Forming. 2010;3(4):233–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkus H, Asılturk I. Predicting surface roughness of AISI 4140 steel in hard turning process through Artificial neural network fuzzy logic and regression rodels. Sci Res Essays. 2013;6(13):2729–2736.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta AK. Predictive modeling of turning operations using response surface methodology artificial neural networks and support vector regression. Int J Manuf Technol. 2010;48(3):763–778.
   Google Scholar
• Dimla DE, Lister PM. On-line metal cutting tool condition monitoring II: tool-state classification using multi-layer perceptron neural network. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2000;40(99):769–778.
   Google Scholar
• Rafighi M The cutting sound effect of on the power consumption, surface roughness and machining force in dry turning of Ti-6al-4V titanium alloy, proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers. Part C: J Mech Eng Sci. 2022;236(6):09544062211072411. DOI:10.11177/109544062211072411
   Google Scholar
• Hekimoğlu AP, Bayraktar Ş Experimental research on machinability charactersitics of Al-9si alloy: effect of Sr and Mg additives, proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers. Part B: J Eng Manuf. 2022;236(13):054221092916. DOI:10.1177/09544054221092916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittali P, Kalwa V, Athith D, et al. B.K.: optimization of machining parameters in turning operation to minimize the surface roughness using Taguchi technique for EN1A alloy. Maters Today: Proceesings. 2016;54:463–467.
   Google Scholar
• Zahoor S, Shehzad A, Salman Habib M Milling of Inconel 718: an experimental and integrated modelling approach for surface roughness. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2022;120(3):1609–1624. DOI:10.1007/s00170-021-08648-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wang Y, Zheng L, et al. Online surface roughness prediction for assembly interface of vertical tail integrating tool wear under variable cutting parameters. Sensors. 2022;22(5):991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motorcu AR, Şahin Y, Kılıclı V, et al. Modeling the surface roughness in machining of AISI 4140 Steel, Int Sci Techn Confer. Modern problems of mechanical engineering and instrument making, p. 237–244, Baku, Azerbaijan. January 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Şahin Y, Erdoğan M, Kılıclı V. Experimental investigation on surface roughness and chip disposability of AISI 4140 steel with different microstructures. In: Akkok M, Erden AK, Kılıç SE, editors. 11th Int Confer on Mach Des Prod.13-15 Vol. 1. Antalya, Turkiye: Mısak; 2004. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar