3D printing applications of thermo-responsive functional materials: A review

References

• Quinn JF, Caruso F. Facile tailoring of film morphology and release properties using layer-by-layer assembly of thermoresponsive materials. Langmuir. 2004 Jan 6;20(1):20–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyon LA, Meng Z, Singh N, et al. Thermoresponsive microgel-based materials. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38(4):865–874.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roy D, Brooks WL, Sumerlin BS. New directions in thermoresponsive polymers. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(17):7214–7243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda T, Kanda T, Yonekura Y, et al. Hydroxylated poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) as functional thermoresponsive materials. Biomacromolecules. 2006 Feb 13;7(2):545–549.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen Z, Hsu PC, Lopez J, et al. Fast and reversible thermoresponsive polymer switching materials for safer batteries. Nature Energy. 2016 Jan 11;1(1):1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz JF, Andrieu J, Üzgün S, et al. Thermoresponsive, and biodegradable: simple preparation of “all-in-one” biorelevant polymers. Macromolecules. 2007 Nov 27;40(24):8540–8543.
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva RM, Mano JF, Reis RL. Smart thermoresponsive coatings and surfaces for tissue engineering: switching cell-material boundaries. Trends Biotechnol. 2007 Dec 1;25(12):577–583.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Du ZY, Xu TT, Huang B, et al. Switchable guest molecular dynamics in a perovskite‐like coordination polymer toward sensitive thermoresponsive dielectric materials. Angew Chem. 2015 Jan 12;127(3):928–932.
   Google Scholar
• Nagase K, Okano T. Thermoresponsive-polymer-based materials for temperature-modulated bioanalysis and bioseparations. J Mat Chem B. 2016 Oct 5;4(39):6381–6397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hruby M, Subr V, Kucka J, et al.Thermoresponsive polymers as promising new materials for local radiotherapy. Appl radiat isot. 2005 Oct 1634423–431
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ganesh VA, Baji A, Ramakrishna S. Smart functional polymers–a new route towards creating a sustainable environment. RSC Adv. 2014;4(95):53352–53364.
   Google Scholar
• Lendlein A, Kelch S. Shape‐memory polymers. Angewandte Chemie. 2002 Jun 17;41(12):2034–2057.
   Google Scholar
• Lendlein A, Langer R. Biodegradable, elastic shape-memory polymers for potential biomedical applications. Science. 2002 May 31;296(5573):1673–1676.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu C, Qin H, Mather PT. Review of progress in shape-memory polymers. J Mater Chem. 2007;17(16):1543–1558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdan E, Michorczyk P. 3D Printing in heterogeneous catalysis—The state of the art. Materials. 2020 Oct 13;13(20):4534.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sepahi MT, Abusalma H, Jovanovic V, et al. Mechanical properties of 3D-printed parts made of polyethylene terephthalate glycol. J Mater Eng Perform. 2021 Sep;30:6851–6861.
   Google Scholar
• Prabhakar MM, Saravanan AK, Lenin AH, et al. A short review on 3D printing methods, process parameters and materials. Mater Today: Proc. 2021 Jan 1;45:6108–6114.
   Google Scholar
• Fico D, Rizzo D, Casciaro R, et al. A review of polymer-based materials for fused filament fabrication (FFF): focus on sustainability and recycled materials. Polymers. 2022 Jan 24;14(3):465.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aparna S, Purnima D, Adusumalli RB. Review on various compatibilizers and its effect on mechanical properties of compatibilized nylon blends. Polym-Plast Technol Eng. 2017 Apr 13;56(6):617–634.
   Google Scholar
• Ghebretinsae F, Mikkelsen O, Akessa ADStrength analysis of 3D printed carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastic using experimental and numerical methodsInIop Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering2019Nov17001012024IOP Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Prajapati AR, Dave HK, Raval HK Effect of fiber volume fraction on the impact strength of fiber reinforced polymer composites made by FDM process. Mater Today: Proc. 2021 Jan 1;44:2102–2106.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, McAninch IM, Delarue AP, et al. Additively manufactured thermosetting elastomer composites: small changes in resin formulation lead to large changes in mechanical and viscoelastic properties. Adv Mater. 2023;4(2):607–615.
   Google Scholar
• Siacor FD, Chen Q, Zhao JY, et al. On the additive manufacturing (3D printing) of viscoelastic materials and flow behavior: from composites to food manufacturing. Additive Manuf. 2021 Sep 1;45:102043.
   Google Scholar
• Ikram H, Al Rashid A, Koç M. Additive manufacturing of smart polymeric composites: literature review and future perspectives. Polym Composites. 2022 Sep;43(9):6355–6380.
   Google Scholar
• Weyhrich CW, Long TE. Additive manufacturing of high‐performance engineering polymers: present and future. Poly Int. 2022 May;71(5):532–536.
   Google Scholar
• Yap YL, Sing SL, Yeong WY. A review of 3D printing processes and materials for soft robotics. Rapid Prototyping J. 2020 Jun 25;26(8):1345–1361.
   Google Scholar
• Kawalkar R, Dubey HK, Lokhande SP A review for advancements in standardization for additive manufacturing. Mater Today: Proc. 2022 Jan 1;50:1983–1990.
   Google Scholar
• Gumpinger J, Seifi M, Shamsaei N, et al. Recent progress on global standardization. Fundamentals of Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Metals. 2021 Jan;1:563–582.
   Google Scholar
• Huning A, Smith A, Scime L, et al. Advancement of Certification Methods and Applications for Industrial Deployments of Components Derived from Advanced Manufacturing Technologies. United States: Oak Ridge National Lab.(ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); 2022 Sep 1.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau M, Medini K, Romero D, et al. Configurators as a means to leverage customer-centric sustainable systems-evidence from the 3D-printing domain. Procedia CIRP. 2021 Jan 1;96:103–108.
   Google Scholar
• Schmutzler C, Zimmermann A, Zaeh MF. Compensating warpage of 3D printed parts using free-form deformation. Procedia CIRP. 2016 Jan 1;41:1017–1022.
   Google Scholar
• Schmutzler C, Stiehl TH, Zaeh MF. Empirical process model for shrinkage-induced warpage in 3D printing. Rapid Prototyping J. 2019 Feb 18;25(4):721–727.
   Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay A, Heer B. Additive manufacturing of multi-material structures. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2018 Jul 1;129:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Adam GA, Zimmer D. On design for additive manufacturing: evaluating geometrical limitations. Rapid Prototyping J. 2015 Oct 19;21(6):662–670.
   Google Scholar
• Bordat A, Boissenot T, Nicolas J, et al. Thermoresponsive polymer nanocarriers for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2019 Jan 1;138:167–192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferreira SB, Moço TD, Borghi-Pangoni FB, et al. Rheological, mucoadhesive and textural properties of thermoresponsive polymer blends for biomedical applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Mar 1;55:164–178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sponchioni M, Palmiero UC, Moscatelli D. Thermo-responsive polymers: applications of smart materials in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. 2019 Sep 1;102:589–605.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, et al. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev. 2017 Aug 9;117(15):10212–10290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lipson H, Kurman M. Fabricated: the new world of 3D printing. United States: John Wiley & Sons; 2013 Jan 22.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, et al. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Composites. 2017 Feb 1;110:442–458.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha VG, Garcia-Tunon E, Botas C, et al. Multimaterial 3D printing of graphene-based electrodes for electrochemical energy storage using thermoresponsive inks. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2017 Oct 25;9(42):37136–37145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsiao LC, Badruddoza AZ, Cheng LC, et al. 3D printing of self-assembling thermoresponsive nanoemulsions into hierarchical mesostructured hydrogels. Soft Matter. 2017;13(5):921–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbadessa A, Blokzijl MM, Mouser VH, et al. A thermo-responsive and photo-polymerizable chondroitin sulfate-based hydrogel for 3D printing applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2016 Sep 20;149:163–174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Celikkin N, Simó Padial J, Costantini M, et al. 3D printing of thermoresponsive polyisocyanide (PIC) hydrogels as bioink and fugitive material for tissue engineering. Polymers. 2018 May;10(5):555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochis A, Bonetti L, Sorrentino R, et al. 3D printing of thermo-responsive methylcellulose hydrogels for cell-sheet engineering. Materials. 2018 Apr;11(4):579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh FY, Lin HH, Hsu SH. 3D bioprinting of neural stem cell-laden thermoresponsive biodegradable polyurethane hydrogel and potential in central nervous system repair. Biomaterials. 2015 Dec 1;71:48–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lei Z, Wang Q, Wu P. A multifunctional skin-like sensor based on a 3D printed thermo-responsive hydrogel. Mater Horizons. 2017;4(4):694–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai YC, Li S, Hu SG, et al. Synthesis of thermoresponsive amphiphilic polyurethane gel as a new cell printing material near body temperature. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2015 Dec 23;7(50):27613–27623.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsukamoto Y, Akagi T, Shima F, et al. Fabrication of orientation-controlled 3D tissues using a layer-by-layer technique and 3D printed a thermoresponsive gel frame. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2017 Jun 1;23(6):357–366.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xie M, Sun Y, Wang J, et al. Thermo-sensitive sacrificial microsphere-based bioink for centimeter-scale tissue with angiogenesis. Int J Bioprinting. 2022;8(4):599.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khan ZN, Albalawi HI, Valle-Pérez AU, et al. From 3D printed molds to bioprinted scaffolds: a hybrid material extrusion and vat polymerization bioprinting approach for soft matter constructs. Mater Sci Add Manuf. 2020;1(7). DOI:10.18063/msam.v1i1.7
   Google Scholar
• Ng WL, Ayi TC, Liu YC, et al. Fabrication and characterization of 3D bioprinted triple-layered human alveolar lung models. Int J Bioprinting. 2021;7(2):332.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang C, Wu S, Li Z, et al. 3D printed porous biomass–derived SiCnw/SiC composite for structure–function integrated electromagnetic absorption. Virtual Phys Prototyping. 2022 Jul 3;17(3):718–733.
   Google Scholar
• Luis E, Pan HM, Sing SL, et al. 3D direct printing of silicone meniscus implant using a novel heat-cured extrusion-based printer. Polymers. 2020 May 1;12(5):1031.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han D, Lu Z, Chester SA, et al. Micro 3D printing of a temperature-responsive hydrogel using projection micro-stereolithography. Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 31;8(1):1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nizioł M, Paleczny J, Junka A, et al. 3D printing of thermoresponsive hydrogel laden with an antimicrobial agent towards wound healing applications. Bioengineering. 2021 Jun 8;8(06):79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wickramasinghe S, Do T, Tran P. Flexural behavior of 3D printed bio-inspired interlocking suture structures. Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2022 May 26;1(9). DOI:10.18063/msam.v1i2.9
   Google Scholar
• Huo Z, He J, Pu H, et al. Design and printing of embedded conductive patterns in liquid crystal elastomer for programmable electrothermal actuation. Virtual Phys Prototyping. 2022 Oct 2;17(4):881–893.
   Google Scholar
• Momeni F, Liu X, Ni J. A review of 4D printing. Materials & Design. 2017 May 15;122:42–79.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Demir KG, Gu GX. Developments in 4D-printing: a review on current smart materials, technologies, and applications. Int J Smart Nano Mater. 2019 Jul 3;10(3):205–224.
   Google Scholar
• Hann SY, Cui H, Nowicki M, et al. 4D printing soft robotics for biomedical applications. Additive Manuf . 2020 Sep.2;36:101567.
   Google Scholar
• Castro NJ, Meinert C, Levett P, et al. Current developments in multifunctional smart materials for 3D/4D bioprinting. Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2017 Jun 1;2:67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Kanu NJ, Gupta E, Vates UK, et al. An insight into biomimetic 4D printing. RSC Adv. 2019;9(65):38209–38226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui H, Miao S, Esworthy T, et al. A novel near-infrared light responsive 4D printed nanoarchitecture with dynamically and remotely controllable transformation. Nano Res. 2019 Jun 1;12(6):1381–1388.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhuang J, Gordon MR, Ventura J, et al. Multi-stimuli responsive macromolecules and their assemblies. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(17):7421–7435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idumah CI. Recently emerging trends in magnetic polymer hydrogel nanoarchitectures. Polym Plast Technol Eng. 2022 Feb;7:1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Li W, Zhan Y, Amirfazli A, et al. Recent progress in stimulus-responsive superhydrophobic surfaces. Prog Org Coat. 2022 Jul 1;168:106877.
   Google Scholar
• Imam SS, Hussain A, Altamimi MA, et al. Four-dimensional printing for hydrogel: theoretical concept, 4D materials, shape-morphing way, and future perspectives. Polymers. 2021 Nov 8;13(21):3858.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Y, Li X. 4D-printed bi-material composite laminate for manufacturing reversible shape-change structures. Composites. 2021 Aug 15;219:108918.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Wang Z, Song Z, et al. Biomimetic shape–Color double‐Responsive 4D printing. Adv Mater Technol. 2019 Sep;4(9):1900293.
   Google Scholar
• Razzaq MY, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Mertz G, et al. 4D printing of multicomponent shape-memory polymer formulations. Appl Sci. 2022 Aug 5;12(15):7880.
   Google Scholar
• Chen D, Liu Q, Geng P, et al. A 4D printing strategy and integrated design for programmable electroactive shape-color double-responsive bionic functions. Compos Sci Technol. 2021 May 26;208:108746.
   Google Scholar
• Shao LH, Zhao B, Zhang Q, et al. 4D printing composite with electrically controlled local deformation. Extreme Mech Lett. 2020 Sep 1;39:100793.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Wu J, Mu X, et al. Desolvation induced origami of photocurable polymers by digit light processing. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2017 Jul;38(13):1600625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar