Mechanical Strength Estimation of Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete using ReLU based Deep Neural Network

References

• Heath A, Paine K, McManus M. Minimising the global warming potential of clay based geopolymers. J Clean Prod. 2014;78:75–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks CA, Worrell E, De Jager D, et al., Emission reduction of green house gases from the cement industry. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Interlaken, Austria: IEA GHGR&D Programme; 1998. p. 939–944.
   Google Scholar
• Miller D, Doh J-H, Mulvey M. Concrete slab comparison and embodied energy optimisation for alternate design and construction techniques. Constr Build Mater. 2015;80:329–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidovits J. Geopolymers: inorganic polymeric new materials. J Therm Anal Calorim. 1991;37(8):1633–1656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner LK, Collins FG. Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: a comparison between geopolymer and opc cement concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2013;43:125–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidrich C, Ward C, Chalmers D, et al. Production and handling of coal combustion products. In: Ward C, Heidrich C Yeatman O, editors. Coal Combustion Products Handbook. 2nd ed. Australia: Ash Development Association of Australia; 2014. pp. 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolic´ V, Komljenovic´ M, Marjanovic´ N, et al. Lead immobilisation by geopolymers based on mechanically activated fly ash. Ceram Int. 2014;40(6):8479–8488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brindle JH, McCarthy MJ. Chemical constraints on fly ash glass compositions. Energy Fuels. 2006;20(6):2580–2585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Kristály F, Mucsi G. Geopolymerisation behaviour of size fractioned fly ash. Adv Powder Technol. 2015;26(1):24–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramujee K, Potharaju M. Mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete composites. Mater Today Proc. 2017;4(2):2937–2945.
   Google Scholar
• Soutsos M, Boyle AP, Vinai R, et al. Factors influencing the compressive strength of fly ash based geopolymers. Constr Build Mater. 2016;110:355–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Loya EI, Allouche EN, Vaidya S. Mechanical properties of fly-ash-based geopolymer concrete. ACI Mater J. 2011;108(3):300–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aughenbaugh KL, Williamson T, Juenger MCG. Critical evaluation of strength prediction methods for alkali-activated fly ash. Mater Struct Constr. 2014;48(3):607–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennakoon C, Nazari A, Sanjayan JG, et al. Distribution of oxides in fly ash controls strength evolution of geopolymers. Constr Build Mater. 2014;71:72–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Jaarsveld JGS, van Deventer JSJ. Effect of the alkali metal activator on the properties of fly ash-based geopolymers. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1999;38:3932–3941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A. Composition and microstructure of alkali activated fly ash binder: effect of the activator. Cem Concr Res. 2005;35(10):1984–1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duxson P, Lukey GC, Separovic F, et al. Effect of alkali cations on aluminium incorporation in geopolymeric gels. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2005;44:832–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, et al. Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties. Colloids Surf A. 2005;269(1–3):47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Yang T, Yao X, Zhang Z, et al. Mechanical property and structure of alkali-activated fly ash and slag blends. J Sustain Cem Mater. 2012;1(4):167–178.
   Google Scholar
• Manthena SL, Boddepalli KR. Effect of tile aggregate and flyash on durability and mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete. J Build Rehabil. 2022;7:68.
   Google Scholar
• Karthika V, Awoyera PO, Akinwumi II, et al. Structural properties of lightweight self-compacting concrete made with pumice stone and mineral admixtures. Rev Rom Mater Rom J Mater. 2018;48(2):208–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palanisamy M, Poongodi K, Awoyera PO, et al. Permeability properties of lightweight self-consolidating concrete made with coconut shell aggregate. Integr Med Res. 2020;9:3547–3557.
   Google Scholar
• Adesina A, Awoyera P. Overview of trends in the application of waste materials in self-compacting concrete production. SN Appl Sci. 2019;1. DOI:10.1007/s42452-019-1012-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazumder EA, Prasad M,LV. Characterisation of eco-friendly self-compacting geopolymer concrete for fire endurance properties. J Build Rehabil. 2022;7(92). doi:10.1007/s41024-022-00236-4.
   Google Scholar
• EFNARC. Specification and guidelines for self-compacting concrete. Eur Fed Producers and Applicators of Specialist Prod Struct. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Karri SK, Ponnada MR, Veerni L. Development of eco-friendly GGBS and SF based alkali-activated mortar with quartz sand. J Build Rehabil. 2022;7:100.
   Google Scholar
• Dey S, Kumar VVP, Goud KR, et al. State of art review on self compacting concrete using mineral admixtures. J Build Rehabil. 2021;6:18.
   Google Scholar
• Nazari A. Artificial neural networks application to predict the compressive damage of lightweight geopolymer. Neural Comput Appl. 2021;33(18):12239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunaydın HM, Dogan SZ. A neural network approach for early cost estimation of structural systems of building. Int J Proj Manag. 2004;22(7):595–602.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang Q, Kamiński P, et al. Compressive strength of steel fiber-reinforced concrete employing supervised machine learning techniques. Materials. 2022;15(12):4209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paruthi S, Husain A, Alam P, et al. A review on material mix proportion and strength influence parameters of geopolymer concrete: application of ANN model for GPC strength prediction. Constr Build Mater. 2022;356(October):129253.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvon SS, Jayakumar K. Strength prediction models for recycled aggregate concrete using random forests, ANN and LASSO. J Build Rehabil. 2022;7(5). doi:10.1007/s41024-021-00145-y.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad A, Ahmad W, Aslam F, et al. Compressive strength prediction of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete via advanced machine learning techniques. Case Studies Construction Mater. 2022;16(August 2021):e00840.
   Google Scholar
• Rehman F, Khokhar SA, Khushnood RA. ANN based predictive mimicker for mechanical and rheological properties of eco-friendly geopolymer concrete. Case Studies Construction Mater. 2022;17(July):e01536.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad M, Rashid K, Tariq Z, et al. Utilization of a novel artificial intelligence technique (ANFIS) to predict the compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer. Constr Build Mater. 2021;301(June):124251.
   Google Scholar