Experimental modelling and optimisation of electrochemical surface grinding of hybrid metal matrix composite

References

• Nayak KC, Deshmukh PR, Pandey AK, et al. Microstructural, physical and mechanical characterization of grinding sludge based aluminium metal matrix composite. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2020;773:138895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samal P, Vundavilli PR, Meher A, et al. Recent progress in aluminum metal matrix composites: a review on processing, mechanical and wear properties. J Manuf Processes. 2020;59:131–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ononiwu NH, Chigbogu G, Ozoegwu NM, et al. Evaluation of particle size distribution, mechanical properties, microstructure and electrochemical studies of AA1050/fly ash metal matrix composite. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2021;8:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Singh R, Hashmi MSJ. Metal matrix composite: a methodological review. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2020;6(1):13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou MY, Ren LB, Fan LL, et al. Progress in research on hybrid metal matrix composites. J Alloys Compd. 2020;838:155274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamani NABN, Iqbal AA, Nuruzzaman DM. Tribo-mechanical characterisation of self-lubricating aluminium based hybrid metal matrix composite fabricated via powder metallurgy. Materialia. 2020;14:100936.
   Google Scholar
• Suresh P, Marimuthu K, Ranganathan S, et al. Optimization of machining parameters in turning of Al-SiC-Gr hybrid metal matrix composites using grey-fuzzy algorithm. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2014;24(9):2805–2814. DOI:10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63412-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salur E, Aslan A, Kuntoglu M, et al. Experimental study and analysis of machinability characteristics of metal matrix composites during drilling. Composites. 2019;166:401–413.
   Google Scholar
• Shyha I, Rudd M. Electro-discharge machining of metal matrix composite materials. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2016;2(2):235–244.
   Google Scholar
• Pramanik A. Developments in the non-traditional machining of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2014;86:44–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrivastava PK, Dubey AK. Experimental modeling and optimization of electric discharge diamond face grinding of metal matrix composite. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2013;69(9–12):2471–2480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey PC, Shan HS. Modern machining process. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill publishing company Ltd; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Jain VK. Advanced machining process. New Delhi: Allied publishers; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Shrivastava PK, Dubey AK. Modelling and multi-optimisation of EDDG process using hybrid ANN-GA approach. International Journal of Abrasive Technology. 2016;7:226–245.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Mallik AK. Manufacturing science. EWP private limited, barakhamba road. New Delhi; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena KK, Bellotti M, Camp DV, et al. Electrochemical based hybrid machining. In: Luo X, and Qin Y, editors. Hybrid Machining. Combridge: Academic Press; 2018;111–129.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict GF. Nontraditional manufacturing process. New York: CRC Press; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Patel D, Jain VK, Ramkumar J. Electrochemical grinding. Jain, V.K. (Ed.): Nanofinishing Science and Technology, CRC Press; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Puri AB, Banerjee S. Multiple-response optimization of electrochemical grinding characteristics through response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2013;64:715–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrani AF, Atkinson J. Overcut in pulse electrochemical grinding. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B. 2000;214:259–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Wu Y, Nomura M, et al. Fundamental machining characteristics of ultrasonic assisted electrochemical grinding of Ti-6Al-4V ASME. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2018;140(7):071009. DOI:10.1115/1.4039855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami RN, Mitra S, Sarkar S. Experimental investigation on electrochemical grinding (ECG) of alumina-aluminum interpenetrating phase composite. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2009;40:729–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaikwad KS, Joshi SS. Modeling of material removal rate in micro-ECG process ASME. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2008;130(3):034502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilhan RE, Sathyanarayanan G, Storer RH, et al. A study of wheel wears in electrochemical surface grinding. J Eng Ind. 1992;114(1):82–93. DOI:10.1115/1.2899762
   Google Scholar
• Sapre P, Mall A, Joshi SS. Analysis of electrolytic flow effects in micro-electrochemical grinding. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2013;135(1):011012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahi DK, Dubey AK. A study on the effect of voltage on performance characteristics of electrochemical surface grinding of HMMC. Mater Today Proc. 2021;44(1):1444–1447.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Dubey AK, Rahi DK Analysis of Electrolyte Flow in IEG during Electrochemical Grinding of MMC, Kalamkar VR Monkova K (editors) Proceedings of ICAME 2020, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020; 307–316. 10.1007/978-981-15-3639-7.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushal SB, Narayan A. Experimental setup development and parametric study of electrochemical face grinding process using Ni-based superalloy. International Journal of Abrasive Technology. 2020;10(1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Yehia HM, Hakim M, El-Assal A. Effect of the Al2O3 powder addition on the metal removal rate and the surface roughness of the electrochemical grinding machining. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B. 2020;234(12):1538–1548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahi DK, Dubey AK. Comparative study of machining quality for the Al–SiC–Gr hybrid metal matrix composite using ECM and ECSG. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2022;236:09544062211069330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav SK, Yadav SKS. Multi-objective optimization of electrochemical cut-off grinding process of Ti-6Al-4V using PCA based grey relational analysis. Mater Today Proc. 2020;22:3089–3099.
   Google Scholar
• Sajeevan R, Dubey AK. Machining quality comparison of Al-TiB2 composite using conventional EDM and magnetic force-assisted powder-mixed EDM. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2021;8:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. New York: Wiley; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey AK, Dubey AK. Simultaneous optimization of multiple quality characteristics in laser cutting of titanium alloy sheet. Optics & Laser Technology. 2012;44(6):1858–1865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey AK, Dubey AK. Fuzzy expert system for prediction of kerf qualities in pulsed laser cutting of titanium alloy sheet. Mach Sci Technol. 2013;17(4):545–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini SK, Dubey AK, Upadhyay BN, et al. Study of hole characteristics in laser trepan drilling of ZTA. Optics & Laser Technology. 2018;103:330–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey AK, Dubey AK. Modeling and optimization of kerf taper and surface roughness in laser cutting of titanium alloy sheet. J Mech Sci Technol. 2013;27(7):2115–2124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh UK, Dubey AK. Effect of process parameters in friction stir welding of dissimilar magnesium alloys. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2021;43(10):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen M, Shan HS. Analysis of hole quality characteristics in the electro jet drilling process. International Journal of Mechanical Tool Manufacturing. 2005;45:1706–1716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senthikumar C, Ganesan G, Karthikeyan R. Study of electrochemical machining characteristics of Al/SiCp composite. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2009;43:256–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman HM, Abdel RM. Integrity of surface produced by electrochemical machining. Journal of Mater Process Technology. 1993;37:667–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar