Machining aerospace aluminium alloy with cryo-treated and untreated HSS cutting tools

References

• Aamir M, Giasin K, Tolouei-Rad M, et al. A review: drilling performance and hole quality of aluminium alloys for aerospace applications. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9(6):12484–12500. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Dursun T, Soutis C. Recent developments in advanced aircraft aluminium alloys. Materials & Design (1980-2015). 2014;56:862–871. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aamir M, Tolouei-Rad M, Giasin K, et al. Recent advances in drilling of carbon fiber–reinforced polymers for aerospace applications: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;105(5):2289–2308. doi: 10.1007/s00170-019-04348-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun D, Lemoine P, Keys D, et al. Hole-making processes and their impacts on the microstructure and fatigue response of aircraft alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;94(5):1719–1726. doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-9850-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Guo K, Sun J, et al. Evaluation of novel tool geometries in dry drilling aluminium 2024-T351/titanium Ti6Al4V stack. J Mater Process Technol. 2018;259:270–281. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.04.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalidas S, DeVor RE, Kapoor SG. Experimental investigation of the effect of drill coatings on hole quality under dry and wet drilling conditions. Surf Coat Technol. 2001;148(2–3):117–128. doi: 10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01349-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aamir M, Tolouei-Rad M, Giasin K, et al. Machinability of Al2024, Al6061, and Al5083 alloys using multi-hole simultaneous drilling approach. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9(5):10991–11002. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.078
   Google Scholar
• Sarikaya M, Gupta MK, Tomaz I, et al. Cooling techniques to improve the machinability and sustainability of light-weight alloys: a state-of-the-art review. J Manuf Processes. 2021;62:179–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhowmick S, Alpas AT. Minimum quantity lubrication drilling of aluminium–silicon alloys in water using diamond-like carbon coated drills. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2008;48(12–13):1429–1443. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leep HR. Influence of cutting fluids on surface finish of holes drilled into aluminium 390. J Synth Lubr. 1990;6(4):325–338. doi: 10.1002/jsl.3000060406
   Google Scholar
• Bono MJ. Experimental and analytical issues in drilling. USA: University of Michigan; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva FJ, Franco SD, Machado AR, et al. Performance of cryogenically treated HSS tools. Wear. 2006;261(5–6):674–685. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podgornik B, Paulin I, Zajec B, et al. Deep cryogenic treatment of tool steels. J Mater Process Technol. 2016;229:398–406. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.09.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N. Technological change in the machine tool industry, 1840–1910. J Econ Hist. 1963;23(4):414–443. doi: 10.1017/S0022050700109155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinari A, Pellizzari M, Gialanella S, et al. Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on the mechanical properties of tool steels. J Mater Process Technol. 2001;118(1–3):350–355. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00973-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal DM, Renganarayanan S, Kalanidhi A. Cryogenic treatment to augment wear resistance of tool and die steels. Cryogenics. 2001;41(3):149–155. doi: 10.1016/S0011-2275(01)00065-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh G, Pandey K. Effect of cryogenic treatment on properties of materials: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E. 2022;236(4):1758–1773. doi: 10.1177/09544089221090189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harish S, Bensely A, Lal DM, et al. Microstructural study of cryogenically treated en 31 bearing steel. J Mater Process Technol. 2009;209(7):3351–3357. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.07.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhbarizadeh A, Shafyei A, Golozar M. Effects of cryogenic treatment on wear behavior of D6 tool steel. Mater Design. 2009;30(8):3259–3264. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensely A, Prabhakaran A, Lal DM, et al. Enhancing the wear resistance of case carburized steel (en 353) by cryogenic treatment. Cryogenics. 2005;45(12):747–754. doi: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2005.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çiçek A, Kıvak T, Uygur I, et al. Performance of cryogenically treated M35 HSS drills in drilling of austenitic stainless steels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2012;60(1):65–73. doi: 10.1007/s00170-011-3616-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akincioğlu S, Gökkaya H, Uygur İ. A review of cryogenic treatment on cutting tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2015;78(9–12):1609–1627. doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-6755-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adin MŞ. Performances of cryo-treated and untreated cutting tools in machining of AA7075 aerospace aluminium alloy. Eur Mech Sci. 2023;7(2):70–81. doi: 10.26701/ems.1270937
   Google Scholar
• Šolić S, Cajner F, Panjan P. Influence of deep cryogenic treatment of high speed steel substrate on TiAlN coating properties. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik. 2013;44(12):950–958. doi: 10.1002/mawe.201300168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara F, Takmaz A. Optimization of cryogenic treatment effects on the surface roughness of cutting tools. Mater Test. 2019;61(11):1101–1104. doi: 10.3139/120.111427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbek NA, Özbek O. Effect of cryogenic treatment holding time on mechanical and microstructural properties of Sverker 21 steel. Mater Test. 2022;64(12):1809–1817. doi: 10.1515/mt-2022-0207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaak CJ, Reitz W. The effects of cryogenic treatment on the thermal conductivity of GRCop-84. Mater Manuf Processes. 2007;23(1):82–91. doi: 10.1080/10426910701524626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Chen D, Chen Z, et al. Effect of cryogenic treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of AZ31 magnesium alloy. Mater Manuf Processes. 2010;25(8):837–841. doi: 10.1080/10426910903496862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill SS. Machining performance of cryogenically treated AISI M2 high speed steel tools. J Eng Res Studies. 2012;3(2):45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Shirbhate A, Deshpande N, Puri Y. Effect of cryogenic treatment on cutting torque and surface finish in drilling operation with AISI M2 high speed steel. Int J Mech Eng Rob Res. 2012;1(2):50–58.
   Google Scholar
• Firouzdor V, Nejati E, Khomamizadeh F. Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on wear resistance and tool life of M2 HSS drill. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;206(1–3):467–472. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podgornik B, Leskovšek V, Vižintin J. Influence of deep-cryogenic treatment on tribological properties of P/M high-speed steel. Mater Manuf Processes. 2009;24(7–8):734–738. doi: 10.1080/10426910902809339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurt M, Bagci E, Kaynak Y. Application of Taguchi methods in the optimization of cutting parameters for surface finish and hole diameter accuracy in dry drilling processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2009;40(5):458–469. doi: 10.1007/s00170-007-1368-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozsoy N. Prediction and optimization of thrust force during the drilling of AISI 2080 steel. Mater Test. 2022;64(4):602–609. doi: 10.1515/mt-2021-2098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz A, Cui C, Steinbacher M, et al. Effects of cryogenic treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of high-alloyed tool steels. HTM J Heat Treat Mater. 2020;75(5):73–93. doi: 10.3139/105.110422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savaş AF, Öktem H, Öztürk B, et al. Energy consumption, mechanical and metallographic properties of cryogenically treated tool steels. Open Chem. 2023;21(1):20220322. doi: 10.1515/chem-2022-0322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, Tarng Y. Design optimization of cutting parameters for turning operations based on the Taguchi method. J Mater Process Technol. 1998;84(1–3):122–129. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00079-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi G. System of experimental design, quality resources. Vol. 108. New York, USA: UNIPUB/Krauss International; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. 9th ed. USA: John wiley & sons; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Köklü U. Optimization of kerf and surface roughness of al 7 475-T7 351 alloy machined with WEDM process using the grey-based Taguchi method. Metalurgija. 2012;51(1):47–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göloğlu C, Arslan Y. Zigzag machining surface roughness modelling using evolutionary approach. J Intell Manuf. 2009;20(2):203–210. doi: 10.1007/s10845-008-0222-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markopoulos AP, Davim JP. Advanced machining processes: innovative modeling techniques. FL, USA: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis; 2017. p. 1–351.
   Google Scholar
• Aurich JC, Dornfeld D, Arrazola P, et al. Burrs—analysis, control and removal. CIRP Ann. 2009;58(2):519–542. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Dornfeld DA. Development of an analytical model for drilling burr formation in ductile materials. J Eng Mater Technol. 2002;124(2):192–198. doi: 10.1115/1.1429937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko S-L, Chang J-E, Yang G-E. Burr minimizing scheme in drilling. J Mater Process Technol. 2003;140(1–3):237–242. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00719-2
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie L. Deburring precision miniature parts. Precis eng. 1979;1(4):189–198. doi: 10.1016/0141-6359(79)90099-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi I-H, Kim J-D. Electrochemical deburring system using electroplated CBN wheels. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 1998;38(1–2):29–40. doi: 10.1016/S0890-6955(97)00027-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa ES, MBd S, Machado AR. Burr produced on the drilling process as a function of tool wear and lubricant-coolant conditions. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2009;31:57–63. doi: 10.1590/S1678-58782009000100009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senthilkumar D, Rajendran I. Optimization of deep cryogenic treatment to reduce wear loss of 4140 steel. Mater Manuf Processes. 2012;27(5):567–572. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2011.593237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das D, Dutta A, Ray K. On the refinement of carbide precipitates by cryotreatment in AISI D2 steel. Philos Mag. 2009;89(1):55–76. doi: 10.1080/14786430802534552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arockia Jaswin M, Mohan Lal D. Optimization of the cryogenic treatment process for en 52 valve steel using the Grey-Taguchi method. Mater Manuf Processes. 2010;25(8):842–850. doi: 10.1080/10426910903536766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vimal AJ, Bensely A, Lal DM, et al. Deep cryogenic treatment improves wear resistance of en 31 steel. Mater Manuf Processes. 2008;23(4):369–376. doi: 10.1080/10426910801938098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar TV, Thirumurugan R, Viswanath B. Influence of cryogenic treatment on the metallurgy of ferrous alloys: a review. Mater Manuf Processes. 2017;32(16):1789–1805. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2017.1317790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padmakumar M, Dinakaran D. A review on cryogenic treatment of tungsten carbide (WC-Co) tool material. Mater Manuf Processes. 2021;36(6):637–659. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2020.1843668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis R, Singh A. Performance study of cryo-treated end mill via wet, cryogenic, and hybrid lubri-coolant-milling induced surface integrity of biocompatible mg alloy AZ91D. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2021;235(23):7045–7061. doi: 10.1177/09544062211017160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gökkaya H, Akıncıoğlu S. Effects of cryogenically treated physical vapor deposition-coated tools on the turning performance of nickel-based superalloy. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E. 2023;237(2):312–325. doi: 10.1177/09544089221103515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akincioğlu S, Gökkaya H, Akincioğlu G, et al. Taguchi optimization of surface roughness in the turning of Hastelloy C22 super alloy using cryogenically treated ceramic inserts. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2020;234(19):3826–3836. doi: 10.1177/0954406220917708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koklu U. The drilling machinability of 5083 aluminum under shallow and deep cryogenic treatment. Emerg Mater Res. 2020;9(2):323–330. doi: 10.1680/jemmr.19.00127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çiçek A, Kıvak T, Ekici E. Optimization of drilling parameters using Taguchi technique and response surface methodology (RSM) in drilling of AISI 304 steel with cryogenically treated HSS drills. J Intell Manuf. 2015;26(2):295–305. doi: 10.1007/s10845-013-0783-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seah K, Rahman M, Yong K. Performance evaluation of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide cutting tool inserts. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B. 2003;217(1):29–43. doi: 10.1243/095440503762502260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini A, Pabla B, Dhami S. Developments in cutting tool technology in improving machinability of Ti6Al4V alloy: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B. 2016;230(11):1977–1989. doi: 10.1177/0954405416640176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafighi M. Effects of shallow cryogenic treatment on surface characteristics and machinability factors in hard turning of AISI 4140 steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E. 2022;236(5):2118–2130. doi: 10.1177/09544089221083467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar N, Kishore NS, Paul S, et al. The effects of cryogenic cooling on chips and cutting forces in turning AISI 1040 and AISI 4320 steels. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B. 2002;216(5):713–724. doi: 10.1243/0954405021520409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Gao L, Zhou P. Effects of deep cryogenic treatment on WC-Co cutter performances in milling of superalloy GH536. Adv Mech Eng. 2020;12(5):1687814020918494. doi: 10.1177/1687814020918494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam M. Effects of deep cryogenic treatment on machinability, hardness and microstructure in dry turning process of tempered steels. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E. 2021;235(4):927–936. doi: 10.1177/0954408920979446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giasin K, Hodzic A, Phadnis V, et al. Assessment of cutting forces and hole quality in drilling Al2024 aluminium alloy: experimental and finite element study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;87(5):2041–2061. doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-8563-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koklu U. Influence of the process parameters and the mechanical properties of aluminum alloys on the burr height and the surface roughness in dry drilling. Mater Tehnol. 2012;46(2):103–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aamir M, Tolouei-Rad M, Giasin K. Multi-spindle drilling of Al2024 alloy and the effect of TiAlN and TiSiN-coated carbide drills for productivity improvement. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2021;114(9):3047–3056. doi: 10.1007/s00170-021-07082-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalsi NS, Sehgal R, Sharma VS. Cryogenic treatment of tool materials: a review. Mater Manuf Processes. 2010;25(10):1077–1100. doi: 10.1080/10426911003720862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SreeramaReddy T, Sornakumar T, VenkataramaReddy M, et al. Machining performance of low temperature treated P-30 tungsten carbide cutting tool inserts. Cryogenics. 2008;48(9–10):458–461. doi: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2008.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SreeramaReddy T, Sornakumar T, VenkataramaReddy M, et al. Machinability of C45 steel with deep cryogenic treated tungsten carbide cutting tool inserts. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater. 2009;27(1):181–185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2008.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phadke MS. Quality engineering using robust design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hill; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Ross PJ. Taguchi techniques for quality engineering: loss function, orthogonal experiments, parameter and tolerance design, 1-279. Boston, USA: ‎ McGraw Hill; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Ratnam M. Factors affecting surface roughness in finish turning. In: Hashmi MSJ, editor. Comprehensive materials finishing. Vol. 1. Netherlands: Elsevier Inc; 2017. p. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Sreejith P, Ngoi B. Dry machining: machining of the future. J Mater Process Technol. 2000;101(1–3):287–291. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00445-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivero A, Aramendi G, Herranz S, et al. An experimental investigation of the effect of coatings and cutting parameters on the dry drilling performance of aluminium alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2006;28(1):1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00170-004-2349-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattnaik SK, Bhoi NK, Padhi S, et al. Dry machining of aluminum for proper selection of cutting tool: tool performance and tool wear. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;98(1):55–65. doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-0307-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu K, Li J, Sun J, et al. Investigation on chip morphology and properties in drilling aluminum and titanium stack with double cone drill. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;94(5):1947–1956. doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-0988-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Guo K, Sun J, et al. Evolution of 3D chip morphology and phase transformation in dry drilling Ti6Al4V alloys. J Manuf Processes. 2018;34:531–539. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astakhov VP. Tribology of metal cutting- tribology and interface engineering series. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd; 2006. p. 52.
   Google Scholar
• Sun J, Guo Y. A new multi-view approach to characterize 3D chip morphology and properties in end milling titanium ti–6Al–4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2008;48(12–13):1486–1494. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aamir M, Tolouei-Rad M, Giasin K, et al. Feasibility of tool configuration and the effect of tool material, and tool geometry in multi-hole simultaneous drilling of Al2024. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2020;111(3):861–879. doi: 10.1007/s00170-020-06151-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar