Multi-response optimisation during face milling of polyoxymethylene copolymer using grey relational analysis and data envelopment analysis based ranking coupled with the Taguchi approach

References

• Ghori SW, Siakeng R, Rasheed M, et al. The role of advanced polymer materials in aerospace. Sustain Compos Aerosp Appl. 2018;1:19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Keresztes R, Kalácska G, Zsidai L, et al. Machinability of engineering polymers. IJSMED. 2011;2(1):106–114. doi: 10.21825/scad.v2i1.20467
   Google Scholar
• Dobrocky D, Sedlak J, Joska Z, et al. Influence of machining parameters on the surface quality of technical plastics. ECS Trans. 2021;105(1):381. doi: 10.1149/10501.0381ecst
   Google Scholar
• Palanikumar K, Karunamoorthy L, Karthikeyan R. Assessment of factors influencing surface roughness on the machining of glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Mater Des. 2006;27(10):862–871. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagtap TU, Mandave HA. Machining of plastics: a review. Int J Eng Res Gen Sci. 2015;3:577–581.
   Google Scholar
• Alarifi IM. A review on factors affecting machinability and properties of fiber-reinforced polymer composites. J Nat Fibers. 2023;20(1):2154304. doi: 10.1080/15440478.2022.2154304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabbi A, Yallese MA, Meddour I, et al. Predictive modeling and multi-response optimization of technological parameters in turning of polyoxymethylene polymer (POM C) using RSM and desirability function. Meas J Int Meas Confed. 2017;95:99–115. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.09.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arifin N, Yusoff H, Sudin I, et al. Study the effect of CNC milling parameter on surface roughness of POM material. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci. 2016;11:6611–6614.
   Google Scholar
• Campos Rubio JC, Panzera TH, Scarpa F. Machining behaviour of three high-performance engineering plastics. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf. 2015;229(1):28–37. doi: 10.1177/0954405414525142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panc N, Contiu G, Bocanet V. Comparative analysis of surface finishing for different cutting strategies of parts made from POM C BT – Advances in manufacturing engineering and materials. Hloch S, Klichová D, Krolczyk GM, Chattopadhyaya S, Ruppenthalová L, eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 324–332.
   Google Scholar
• Chabbi A, Yallese MA, Nouioua M, et al. Modeling and optimization of turning process parameters during the cutting of polymer (POM C) based on RSM, ANN, and DF methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2017;91(5–8):2267–2290. doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-9858-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aruna M. Optimization of cutting parameters in machining polyoxymethylene using RSM. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2020;893(1):12005. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/893/1/012005
   Google Scholar
• Trifunovic M, Madić M, Janković P, et al. Investigation of cutting and specific cutting energy in turning of POM-C using a PCD tool: analysis and some optimization aspects. J Clean Prod. 2021;303:127043. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarević D, Madić M, Janković P, et al. Surface roughness minimization of polyamide PA-6 turning by Taguchi method. J Prod Eng. 2012;15:29.
   Google Scholar
• Belhadi S, Kaddeche M, Chaoui K, et al. Machining optimization of HDPE pipe using the Taguchi method and grey relational analysis. Int Polym Process. 2016;31(4):491–502. doi: 10.3139/217.3271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnikrishna Pillai J, Sanghrajka I, Shunmugavel M, et al. Optimisation of multiple response characteristics on end milling of aluminium alloy using Taguchi-Grey relational approach. Meas J Int Meas Confed. 2018;124:291–298. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altan Özbek N, Özbek O, Kara F, et al. Effect of eco-friendly minimum quantity lubrication in hard machining of vanadis 10: a high strength steel. Steel Res Int. 2022;93:2100587. doi: 10.1002/srin.202100587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koklu U. Optimization of kerf and surface roughness of al 7 475-t7 351 alloy machined with wedm process using the grey-based Taguchi method. Metal -Sisak Then Zagreb. 2012;51:47–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kurt M, Köklü U. Minimization of the shape error in the interrupted grinding process by using Taguchi method. Mechanika. 2012;18(6):677–682. doi: 10.5755/j01.mech.18.6.3163
   Google Scholar
• Köklü U, Mayda M, Morkavuk S, et al. Optimization and prediction of thrust force, vibration and delamination in drilling of functionally graded composite using Taguchi, ANOVA and ANN analysis. Mater Res Express. 2019;6(8):85335. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab2617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultana N, Dhar NR. Hybrid GRA-PCA and modified weighted TOPSIS coupled with Taguchi for multi-response process parameter optimization in turning AISI 1040 steel. Arch Mech Eng. 2021;68:23–49. doi: 10.24425/ame.2020.131707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjunath Patel GC, Jagadish Kumar RS, Naidu NVS. Optimization of abrasive water jet machining for green composites using multi-variant hybrid techniques. J Manuf Process. 2020;1:129–162. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-19638-7_6
   Google Scholar
• Kharwar PK, Verma RK, Mandal NK, et al. Swarm intelligence integrated approach for experimental investigation in milling of multiwall carbon nanotube/polymer nanocomposites. Arch Mech Eng. 2020;67:353–376. doi: 10.24425/ame.2020.131698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaser EKM, Shunmugesh K. Multi-objective optimization of milling process parameters in glass fibre reinforced polymer via grey relational analysis and desirability function. Mater Today Proc. 2019;11:1015–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.12.032
   Google Scholar
• Haoues S, Yallese MA, Belhadi S, et al. Optimisation Mono Et Multi-Objectif De L’Usinage Du Polyamide (Pa66-Gf30%) En Utilisant La Methode Taguchi-Dear Basee Sur Le Rapport Signal/Bruit. UPB Sci Bull Ser D Mech Eng. 2022;84:107–118.
   Google Scholar
• Alateyah AI, El-Taybany Y, El-Sanabary S, et al. Experimental investigation and optimization of turning polymers using RSM, GA, hybrid FFD-GA, and MOGA methods. Polymers. 2022;14(17):14. doi: 10.3390/polym14173585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert K, Korzenszky P, Keresztes R. Research on the turning of technical polymers. UPB Sci. Bull. 2021;35:49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Azzi A, Boulanouar L, Laouisi A, et al. Modeling and optimization of machining parameters to minimize surface roughness and maximize productivity when turning polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2022;123(1–2):407–430. doi: 10.1007/s00170-022-10160-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabacaru V. Artificial neural networks applied to prediction of surface roughness in dry drilling of some polymers. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2020;916(1):12117. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/916/1/012117
   Google Scholar
• Kumar K, Verma RK. Combined compromise solution for machining performance optimization of modified polymer composite. Adv Form Mach Autom. Dixit US, Kanthababu M, Ramesh Babu A, Udhayakumar S, editors. 2023;1:197–206.
   Google Scholar
• Kesarwani S, Verma RK. Ant lion optimizer (ALO) algorithm for machinability assessment during milling of polymer composites modified by zero-dimensional carbon nano onions (0D-CNOs). Measurement. 2022;187:110282. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haoues S, Yallese MA, Belhadi S, et al. Modeling and optimization in turning of PA66-GF30% and PA66 using multi-criteria decision-making (PSI, MABAC, and MAIRCA) methods: a comparative study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2023;124(7–8):2401–2421. doi: 10.1007/s00170-022-10583-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarankó Á, Kalácska G, Keresztes RZ. Analysis of formed chips in the case of turning different polymer materials. Hung J Ind Chem. 2021;49(2):71–75. doi: 10.33927/hjic-2021-25
   Google Scholar
• Kumar J, Verma RK. Delamination assessment during machining of laminated polymer nanocomposite. IJMMT. 2021;13(2):109–115. doi: 10.54684/ijmmt.2021.13.2.109
   Google Scholar
• Kumar J, Verma RK, Mondal AK, et al. A hybrid optimization technique to control the machining performance of graphene/carbon/polymer (epoxy) nanocomposites. Polym Polym Compos. 2021;29(9_suppl):S1168–S1180. doi: 10.1177/09673911211046789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natarajan E, Kaviarasan V, Lim WH, et al. Non-dominated sorting modified teaching–learning-based optimization for multi-objective machining of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). J Intell Manuf. 2020;31(4):911–935. doi: 10.1007/s10845-019-01486-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fnides M, Yallese MA, Khattabi R, et al. Modeling and optimization of surface roughness and productivity thru RSM in face milling of AISI 1040 steel using coated carbide inserts. Int J Ind Eng Comput. 2017;8:493–512. doi: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2017.3.001
   Google Scholar
• Selaimia AA, Yallese MA, Bensouilah H, et al. Modeling and optimization in dry face milling of X2CrNi18-9 austenitic stainless steel using RMS and desirability approach. Meas J Int Meas Confed. 2017;107:53–67. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsamutr K, Jongprasithporn S. Optimization parameters of tool life model using the Taguchi approach and response surface methodology. Int J Comput Sci Issues. 2012;9:120–125.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalczyk M. Application of Taguchi and Anova Methods in selection of process parameters for surface roughness in precision turning of titanium. Adv Manuf Sci Technol. 2014;38(2):21–35. doi: 10.2478/amst-2014-0008
   Google Scholar
• Masmiati N, Sarhan AAD. Optimizing cutting parameters in inclined end milling for minimum surface residual stress – Taguchi approach. Meas J Int Meas Confed. 2015;60:267–275. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojciechowski S, Marudar W, Krolczyk M, et al. Application of signal to noise ratio and grey relational analysis to minimize forces and vibrations during precise ball end milling. Precis Eng. 2018;51:582–596. doi: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerti O, Yallese MA, Zerti A, et al. Simultaneous improvement of surface quality and productivity using grey relational analysis based Taguchi design for turning couple (AISI D3 steel/mixed ceramic tool (Al2O3 + TiC)). Int J Ind Eng Comput. 2018;9:173–194. doi: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2017.7.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibria G, Doloi B, Bhattacharyya B. Experimental investigation and multi-objective optimization of Nd: YAG laser micro-turning process of alumina ceramic using orthogonal array and grey relational analysis. Opt Laser Technol. 2013;48:16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.09.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palanisamy D, Senthil P. Optimization on turning parameters of 15-5PH stainless steel using Taguchi based grey approach and Topsis. Arch Mech Eng. 2016;63(3):397–412. doi: 10.1515/meceng-2016-0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1978;2(6):429–444. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong SN, Vo Thi Nhu U. Multi-objective optimization in turning operation of AISI 1055 steel using DEAR method. Tribol Ind. 2021;43(1): 57–65. doi: 10.24874/ti.1006.11.20.01
   Google Scholar
• Moganapriya C, Rajasekar R, Mohanraj T, et al. Dry machining performance studies on TiAlSiN coated inserts in turning of AISI 420 martensitic stainless steel and multi-criteria decision making using Taguchi – DEAR approach. Silicon. 2021;14(8):4183–4196. doi: 10.1007/s12633-021-01202-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chate GR, MP GC, H HM, et al. Sustainable machining: modelling and optimization using Taguchi, MOORA and DEAR methods. Mater Today Proc. 2021;46:8941–8947. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.365
   Google Scholar
• Izamshah R, Azam MA, Hadzley M, et al. Study of surface roughness on milling unfilled-polyetheretherketones engineering plastics. Procedia Eng. 2013;68:654–660. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.235
   Google Scholar
• Kharwar PK, Verma RK. Nature instigated Grey wolf algorithm for parametric optimization during machining (milling) of polymer nanocomposites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2021;36(1):118–140. doi: 10.1177/0892705721993202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelladurai SJS, M K, Ray AP, et al. Optimization of process parameters using response surface methodology: a review. Mater Today Proc. 2021; 37:1301–1304.
   Google Scholar
• Bouziane A, Boulanouar L, Azizi MW, et al. Analysis of cutting forces and roughness during hard turning of bearing steel. Struct Eng Mech. 2018;66:285–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar