Who are the opponents of nudging? Insights from moral foundations theory

References

• Arad, A., & Rubinstein, A. (2018). The people’s perspective on libertarian-parternalistic policies. The Journal of Law & Economics, 61(2), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1086/698608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, G., Dimant, E., & Schmidt, U. (May 27, 2019). When a nudge backfires: Using observation with social and economic incentives to promote pro-social behavior. Available at SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3294375
   Google Scholar
• Branson, C. D., Duffy, B., Perry, C., & Wellings, D. (2011). Acceptable behaviour? Public opinion on behavior change policy. Ipsos Social Research Institute. https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/publication/1970-01/sri-ipsos-mori-acceptable-behaviour-january-2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, H., Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E., Klement, K., Luistro Jonsson, M., & Rahali, B. (2018). Can nudges be transparent and yet effective? Journal of Economic Psychology, 65, 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2018.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, D. M., Dana, J., & Newman, G. E. (2014). Giving versus giving in. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 505–533. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.911576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crimston, D., Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., & Bastian, B. (2016). Moral expansiveness: Examining variability in the extension of the moral world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 636–653. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, O. S., Chesters, M. J., & Van Lissa, C. J. (2019). Mapping morality with a compass: Testing the theory of ‘morality-as-cooperation’ with a new questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diepeveen, S., Ling, T., Suhrcke, M., Roland, M., & Marteau, T. M. (2013). Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 756. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., Van der Toorn, J., Paunov, Y., & van Leeuwen, T. (2019). The psychology of morality: A review and analysis of empirical studies published from 1940 through 2017. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(4), 332–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318811759
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive– experiential and analytical–rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson, A., Nilsson, A., Tinghög, G., Andersson, D., & Västfjäll, D. (2019). Donations to outgroup charities, but not ingroup charities, predict helping intentions toward street-beggars in Sweden. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(4), 814–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018819872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federico, C. M., Weber, C. R., Ergun, D., & Hunt, C. (2013). Mapping the connections between politics and morality: The multiple sociopolitical orientations involved in moral intuition. Political Psychology, 34(4), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/23481698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsen, G., Castelo, N., & Reiner, P. B. (2013). Decisional enhancement and autonomy: Public attitudes towards overt and covert nudges. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(3), 202–213. http://journal.sjdm.org/12/12823/jdm12823.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Waytz, A., Meindl, P., Iyer, R., & Young, L. (2017). Centripetal and centrifugal forces in the moral circle: Competing constraints on moral learning. Cognition, 167, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Hagman, W., Andersson, D., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2015). Public views on policies involving nudges. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0263-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagman, W., Erlandsson, A., Dickert, S., Tinghög, G., & Västfjäll, D. (2019). The effect of paternalistic alternatives on attitudes toward default nudges. Behavioural Public Policy, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2019.17
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. M., & Welch, B. (2010). Debate: To nudge or not to nudge. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00351.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iurino, K., & Saucier, G. (2020). Testing measurement invariance of the moral foundations questionnaire across 27 countries. Assessment, 27(2), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118817916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P., & Haidt, J. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PloS One, 7(8), e42366. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jachimowicz, J. M., Duncan, S., Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2019). When and why defaults influence decisions: A meta-analys of default effects. Behavioural Public Policy, 3(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.43
   Google Scholar
• Jung, J. Y., & Mellers, B. A. (2016). American attitudes toward nudges. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1), 62–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junghans, A., Cheung, T., & de Ridder, D. (2015). Under consumers’ scrutiny - an investigation into consumers’ attitudes and concerns about nudging in the realm of health behavior. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 336. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1691-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kahan D. M. (2012). Cultural cognition as a conception of the cultural theory of risk. In Roeser S., Hillerbrand R., Sandin P., Peterson M. (eds) Handbook of Risk Theory (pp. 725–759). Springer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. & Braman, D. (2006). Cultural cognition and public policy. Yale Law & Policy Review, 24, 147–170. https://ssrn.com/abstract=746508
   Google Scholar
• Koltko-Rivera, M. E. (2004). The psychology of worldviews. Review of General Psychology, 8(1), 3–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P., & Licata, L. (2013). Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 764–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G., Bryce, C., Hagmann, D., & Rajpal, S. (2015). Warning: You are about to be nudged. Behavioral Science & Policy, 1(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1353/bsp.2015.0000
   Google Scholar
• Loibl, C., Sunstein, C. R., Rauber, J., & Reisch, L. A. (2018). Which European like nudges? Approval and controversy in four European countries. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 52(3), 655–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marteau, T. M., Ogilvie, D., Roland, M., Suhrcke, M., & Kelly, M. P. (2011). Judging nudging: Can nudging improve population health? BMJ, 342, d228. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A. (2014). Personality psychology as the integrative study of traits and worldviews. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A., & Erlandsson, A. (2015). The moral foundations taxonomy: Structural validity and relation to political ideology in Sweden. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 28–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A., Erlandsson, A., & Västfjäll, D. (2016). The congruency between moral foundations and intentions to donate, self-reported donations, and actual donations to charity. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A., Erlandsson, A., & Västfjäll, D. (2019). The complex relation between receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit and political ideology. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(10), 1440–1454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219830415
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A., Erlandsson, A., & Västfjäll, D. (2020). Moral foundations theory and the psychology of charitable giving. European Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2256
   Google Scholar
• Pachur, T., & Spaar, M. (2015). Domain-specific preference for intuition and deliberation in decision making. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(3), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peer, E., Egelman, S., Harbach, M., Malkin, N., Mathur, A., & Frik, A. (2019, January 29). Nudge me right: Personalizing online nudges to people’s decision-mkaing styles. Available at SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3324907
   Google Scholar
• Reisch, L. A., & Sunstein, C. R. (2016). Do Europeans like nudges? Judgment and Decision Making, 1(4), 310–325. http://journal.sjdm.org/16/16202b/jdm16202b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reisch, L. A., Sunstein, C. R., & Gwozdz, W. (2017). Beyond carrots and sticks: Europeans support health nudges. Food Policy, 69, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W (2019). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. R packageversion 1.9.12, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., et al. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. (2018, November 1st). Medianlöner i Sverige [Median salaries in Sweden]. https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/sverige-i-siffror/utbildning-jobb-och-pengar/medianloner-i-sverige/
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. (2019, October 7th). Population statistics. https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subject-area/population/population-composition/population-statistics/
   Google Scholar
• Steffel, M., Williams, E. F., & Pogacar, R. (2016). Ethically deployed defaults: Transparency and consumer protection through disclosure and preference articulation. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 865–880. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Why nudge? The politics of libertarian paternalism. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R., Reisch, L. A., & Rauber, J. (2018). A worldwide consensus on nudging? Not quite, but almost. Regulation & Governance, 12(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, D., Fox, C. R., & Rogers, T. (2017). On the misplaced politics of behavioural policy interventions. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(7), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. H. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voelkel, J. G., & Feinberg, M. (2018). Morally reframed arguments can affect support for political candidates. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 917–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617729408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winterich, K. P., Zhang, Y., & Mittal, V. (2012). How political identity and charity positioning increase donations: Insights from moral foundations theory. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, H., & Yates, J. F. (2019). Improving acceptability of nudges: Learning from attitudes towards opt-in and opt-out policies. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(1), 26–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, K. (2012). Nudge as fudge. The Modern Law Review, 75(1), 122–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00893.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, O., & Saribay, S. A. (2017). The relationship between cognitive style and political orientation depends on the measures used. Judgment and Decision Making, 12(2), 140–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar