References
- Alden, L. E., & Trew, J. L. (2013). If it makes you happy: Engaging in kind acts increases positive affect in socially anxious individuals. Emotion, 13(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027761
- Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133
- Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., Felps, W., & Lim, V. K. G. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015406
- Aquino, K., Mcferran, B., & Laven, M. (2011). Identity and the experience of moral elevation in response to acts of uncommon goodness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022540
- Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423
- Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Todd, R. M., Brummett, B. H., Shaw, L. L., & Aldeguer, C. M. R. (1995). Empathy and the collective good: Caring for one of the others in a social dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.619
- Batson, C. D., Dyck, J. L., Brandt, J. R., Batson, J. G., Powell, A. L., McMaster, M. R., & Griffitt, C. (1988). Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 52–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.52
- Batson, C. D., Eklund, J. H., Chermok, V. L., Hoyt, J. L., & Ortiz, B. G. (2007). An additional antecedent of empathic concern: Valuing the welfare of the person in need. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.65
- Baumann, D. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Kendrick, D. T. (1981). Altruism as hedonism: Helping and self-gratification as equivalent responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(6), 1039–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.6.1039
- Baumert, A., Schlösser, T., & Schmitt, M. (2014). Economic games: A performance-based assessment of fairness and altruism. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(3), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000183
- Bazerman, M. H., Blount White, S., & Loewenstein, G. F. (1995). Perceptions of fairness in interpersonal and individual choice situations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770996
- Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9(3), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090304
- Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 75(299), 493–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2228949
- Bekkers, R. (2007a). Measuring altruistic behavior in surveys: The all-or-nothing dictator game. Survey Research Methods, 1(3), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2007.v1i3.54
- Bekkers, R. (2007b). Values and volunteering. A longitudinal study of reciprocal influences in the giving in the Netherlands Panel Study. 36th Arnova Conference, Altanta, USA. https://osf.io/t6yx5/
- Bekkers, R. (2010). Who gives what and when? A scenario study of intentions to give time and money. Social Science Research, 39(3), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.08.008
- Berger, R., Rauhut, H., Prade, S., & Helbing, D. (2012). Bargaining over waiting time in ultimatum game experiments. Social Science Research, 41(2), 372–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSRESEARCH.2011.09.009
- Brooks, M. E., Kristensen, K., van Benthem, K. J., Magnusson, A., Berg, C. W., Nielsen, A., Skaug, H. J., Mächler, M., & Bolker, B. M. (2017). glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R Journal, 9(2), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.32614/rj-2017-066
- Brown, A. L., Meer, J., & Williams, J. F. (2019). Why do people volunteer? An experimental analysis of preferences for time donations. Management Science, 65(4), 1455–1468. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2951
- Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press.
- Chen, D. L., Schonger, M., & Wickens, C. (2016). oTree-An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2015.12.001
- Choshen-Hillel, S., & Yaniv, I. (2011). Agency and the construction of social preference: Between inequaliy aversion and prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1253–1261. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024557
- Danilov, A., & Vogelsang, T. (2015). Time for helping. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 2(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-015-0020-4
- Davis, A. L., Jehli, N., Miller, J. H., & Weber, R. A. (2015). Generosity across contexts. CESinfo. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1969403
- DeVoe, S. E., & Pfeffer, J. (2007). Hourly payment and volunteering: The effect of organizational practices on decisions about time use. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 783–798. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279171
- Dickert, S., Sagara, N., & Slovic, P. (2011). Affective motivations to help others: A two-stage model of donation decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24, 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm
- Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687–1688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150952
- Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Prosocial spending and happiness: Using money to benefit others pays off. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413512503
- Ellingsen, T., & Johannesson, M. (2009). Time is not money. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 72(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.05.010
- Engel, C. (2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 583–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7
- Fagin-Jones, S., & Midlarsky, E. (2007). Courageous altruism: Personal and situational correlates of rescue during the Holocaust. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(2), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701228979
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: Aflexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
- Fehr, E., & Camerer, C. F. (2004). Measuring social norms and preferences using experimental games: A guide for social scientists. In J. Henrich, R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, & H. Gintis (Eds.), Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies (pp. 55–94). Oxford University.
- Ferguson, E., Zhao, K., O’Carroll, R. E., & Smillie, L. D. (2019). Costless and costly prosociality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 461–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618765071
- Fessler, D. M. T. (2009). Return of the lost letter. Experimental framing does not enhance altruism in an everyday context. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 71(2), 575–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.03.007
- Festjens, A., Bruyneel, S., Diecidue, E., & Dewitte, S. (2015). Time-based versus money-based decision making under risk: An experimental investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 50, 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.07.003
- Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (2012). Handbook of social resource theory. Handbook of Social Resource Theory: Theoretical Extensions, Empirical Insights, and Social Applications, 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4175-5
- Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6(3), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1994.1021
- Franklin, B. (1820). Advice to a young tradesman [21 July 1748]. Founders Online, National Archives. https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Franklin/01-03-02-0130 [Original source: The papers of Benjamin Franklin, vol. 3, January 1, 1745, through June 30, 1750, ed. L. W. Labaree. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961, pp. 304–308].
- Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. F., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, XL, 40(2), 351–401. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.40.2.351
- Frimer, J. A., Walker, L. J., Dunlop, W. L., Lee, B. H., & Riches, A. (2011). The integration of agency and communion in moral personality: Evidence of enlightened self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023780
- Gächter, S. (2007). Conditional cooperation: Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications. In B. S. Frey & A. Stutzer (Eds.), Economics and psychology: A promising new cross-disciplinary field (pp. 19–50). MIT Press.
- Greitemeyer, T., Fischer, P., Kastenmüller, A., & Frey, D. (2006). Civil courage and helping behavior: Differences and similarities. European Psychologist, 11(2), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.11.2.90
- Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatium bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
- Hargittai, E., & Shaw, A. (2020). Comparing internet experiences and prosociality in amazon mechanical turk and population-based survey samples. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 6, 237802311988983. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119889834
- Hilbig, B. E., Glöckner, A., & Zettler, I. (2014). Personality and prosocial behavior: Linking basic traits and social value orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036074
- Hilbig, B. E., Thielmann, I., Hepp, J., Klein, S. A., & Zettler, I. (2015). From personality to altruistic behavior (and back): Evidence from a double-blind dictator game. Journal of Research in Personality, 55, 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.12.004
- Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2009). Pillars of cooperation: Honesty-Humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 516–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.003
- Horowitz, J. K., & Mcconnell, K. E. (2002). A review of WTA/WTP studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44, 426–447. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2001.1215.
- Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business, 59(4), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/296367
- Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.193
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341
- Konow, J., & Earley, J. (2008). The hedonistic paradox: Is homo economicus happier? Journal of Public Economics, 92(1–2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.04.006
- Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
- Leclerc, F., Schmitt, B. H., Dubé, L., & Dube, L. (1995). Waiting time and decision making: Is time like money? Source Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1086/209439
- Leder, J., & Betsch, T. (2016). Risky choice in interpersonal context: Do people dare because they care? Journal of Economic Psychology, 52, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.11.003
- Leder, J., & Schütz, A. (2018). Dictator game. In Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 1–4). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_652-1
- Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2018). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-100. Assessment, 25(5), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116659134
- Lee, L., Piliavin, J. A., & Call, V. R. A. (1999). Giving time, money, and blood : Similarities and differences. Social Psychology, 62(3), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695864
- Leonard, L., Michelle, P., Marco, L., Gal, B. Z., & Dan, A. (2015). Money, time, and the stability of consumer preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(2), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0386
- Lilley, A., & Slonim, R. (2014). The price of warm glow. Journal of Public Economics, 114, 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.12.004
- List, J. A. (2007). On the interpretation of giving in dictator games. Journal of Political Economy, 115(3), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1086/519249
- Loewenstein, G. F., Thompson, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.426
- Matsuba, M. K., & Walker, L. J. (2004). Extraordinary moral commitment: Young adults involved in social organizations. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00267.x
- Matsuba, M. K., & Walker, L. J. (2005). Young adult moral exemplars: The making of self through stories. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00097.x
- McClintock, C. G., & Allison, S. T. (1989). Social value orientation and helping behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(4), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb00060.x
- Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(68)90046-2
- Mogliner, C., Chance, Z., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Giving time gives you time. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1233–1238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612442551
- Murphy, R. O., Ackermann, K. A., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2011). Measuring social value orientation. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), 771–781. http://journal.sjdm.org/11/m25/m25.html
- Narvaez, D., Lapsley, D. K., Hagele, S., & Lasky, B. (2006). Moral chronicity and social information processing: Tests of a social cognitive approach to the moral personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(6), 966–985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.10.003
- Okada, E. M., & Hoch, S. J. (2004). Spending time versus spending money. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1086/422110
- Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2004). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 365–392. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141
- Piliavin, J. A., & Hong-Wen, C. (1990). ALTRUISM: A review of recent theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1), 27–65. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.000331
- Rand, D. G. (2016). Cooperation, fast and slow: Meta-analytic evidence for a theory of social heuristics and self-interested deliberation. Psychological Science, 27(9), 1192–1206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616654455
- Rand, D. G. (2017). Reflections on the time-pressure cooperation registered replication report. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(3), 543–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693625
- Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427–430. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11467
- Reed, A., & Aquino, K. F. (2003). Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1270–1286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1270
- Reed, A., Kay, A., Finnel, S., Aquino, K., Levy, E., Ii, A. R., Kay, A., Finnel, S., Levy, E., & Sydney, P. (2015). I don’t want the money, I just want your time: How moral identity overcomes the aversion to giving time to prosocial causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(March 2016), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000058
- Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. L. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1610–1624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1610
- Saini, R., & Monga, A. (2008). How i decide depends on what i spend: Use of heuristics is greater for time than for how i decide depends on what i spend: Use of heuristics is greater for time than for money. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(34), 914–922. https://doi.org/10.1086/525503
- Soman, D. (2001). The mental accounting of sunk time costs: Why time is not like money. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14(3), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.370
- Spiller, S. A., & Lynch, J. G. (2009). Individuals exhibit the planning fallacy for time but not for money. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1458380
- Thaler, R. H., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36(6), 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.6.643
- Trautmann, S. T., & Vieider, F. M. (2012). Social influences on risk attitudes: Applications in economics. In S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sand, & M. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of Risk Theory (pp. 1–28). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5
- van ‘Twout, M., & Leder, J. (2018). Ultimatum game. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 1–5). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_880-1
- Van Lange, P. A. M., Bekkers, R., Schuyt, T. N. M., & Van Vugt, M. (2007). From games to giving: Social value orientation predicts donations to noble causes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29(4), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701665223
- Van Lange, P. A. M., Otten, W., De Bruin, E. M. N., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 733–746. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.733
- Van Lange, P. A. M., Schippers, M., & Balliet, D. (2011). Who volunteers in psychology experiments? An empirical review of prosocial motivation in volunteering. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(3), 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.038
- Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2008). Merely activating the concept of money changes personal and interpersonal behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(3), 208–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00576.x
- Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
- Zaki, J., & Mitchell, J. P. (2013). Intuitive prosociality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(6), 466–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413492764
- Zeckhauser, R. J., Jayendu, P., & Hendricks, D. (1991). Non-rational actors and financial market behavior. Theory and Decision, 31(2–3), 257–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132995
- Zhao, K., & Smillie, L. D. (2015). The role of interpersonal traits in social decision making: Exploring sources of behavioral heterogeneity in economic games. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(3), 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314553709