Using Computational Text Analysis Tools to Study African Online News Content

References

• Afrobarometer. 2019. Rounds 5,6 & 7. Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Atteveldt, W. van, J. Strycharz, D. Trilling, and K. Welbers. 2019. “Toward open computational communication science: A practical road map for reusable data and code.” International Journal of Communication 13: 3935–3954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aukia, J., J. Heimonen, T. Pahikkala, and T. Salakoski. 2017. “Automated quantification of Reuters news using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis: The Western media image of China.” Global Media and China 2 (3–4): 251–268. doi:10.1177/2059436418754890.
   Google Scholar
• Barberá, P. 2015. “Birds of the same feather Tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data.” Political Analysis 23 (01): 76–91. doi:10.1093/pan/mpu011.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A., and Y. M. Zhukov. 2019. “Media ownership and News coverage of International conflict.” Political Communication 36 (1): 36–63. doi:10.1080/10584609.2018.1483606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengfort, B., R. Bilbro, and T. Ojeda. 2018. Applied Text Analysis With Python: Enabling Language-Aware Data Products With Machine Learning. Sebastopol: O’Reilly.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., K. Watanabe, H. Wang, P. Nulty, A. Obeng, S. Müller, and A. Matsuo. 2018. “Quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data.” Journal of Open Source Software 3 (30): 774. doi:10.21105/joss.00774.
   Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. 2003. “Latent dirichlet allocation.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (Jan): 993–1022.
   Google Scholar
• Boumans, J. W., and D. Trilling. 2016. “Taking stock of the Toolkit: An overview of relevant automated content analysis approaches and techniques for digital journalism scholars.” Digital Journalism 4 (1): 8–23. doi:10.1080/21670811.2015.1096598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouvier, G., and D. Machin. 2018. “Critical discourse analysis and the challenges and opportunities of social media.” Review of Communication 18 (3): 178–192. doi:10.1080/15358593.2018.1479881.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, J., A. Bruns, and L. Hjorth. 2013. “Emerging methods for digital media research: An introduction.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 57 (1): 1–3. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.761706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlesworth, A., and E. L. Tonkin. 2016. “If You Find Yourself in a Hole, Stop Digging: Legal and Ethical Issues of Text/Data Mining in Research.” In Working with Text, edited by E. L. Tonkin, and G. J. L. Tourte, 61–88. Amsterdam: Chandos Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. 2019. The best of both worlds: Multi-billion word “dynamic” corpora [Application/pdf]. 23–28. https://doi.org/10.14618/IDS-PUB-9023.
   Google Scholar
• De Grove, F., K. Boghe, and L. De Marez. 2020. “(What) can journalism studies learn from supervised machine learning?” Journalism Studies 21 (7): 912–927. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2020.1743737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowle, M., and A. Srinivasan. 2019. data.table: Extension of “data.frame” (Version 1.12.2) [R]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=data.table.
   Google Scholar
• Feinerer, I., K. Hornik, and D. Meyer. 2008. “Text Mining Infrastructure in R.” Journal of Statistical Software 25 (1): 1–54. doi:10.18637/jss.v025.i05.
   Google Scholar
• Fengler, S., M. Kreutler, M. Alku, B. Barlovac, M. Bastian, S. S. Bodrunova, … R. Zguri. 2020. “The Ukraine conflict and the European media: A comparative study of newspapers in 13 European countries.” Journalism 21 (3): 399–422. doi:10.1177/1464884918774311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, B. 2013. “Editorial.” Digital Journalism 1 (1): 1–5. doi:10.1080/21670811.2012.740264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabore, S. M., and X. Deng. 2018. “Do National and International media cover the same event differently? The online media framing of irreecha festival tragedy.” Communicatio 44 (1): 55–70. doi:10.1080/02500167.2018.1441889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S., and D. P. Green. 2012. Field experiments: Design, analysis, and interpretation. 1st ed. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Grasland, C. 2019. “International news flow theory revisited through a space–time interaction model: Application to a sample of 320,000 international news stories published through RSS flows by 31 daily newspapers in 2015.” International Communication Gazette, 1748048518825091 82 (3): 231–259. doi:10.1177/1748048518825091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer, J., and B. M. Stewart. 2013. “Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts.” Political Analysis 21 (3): 267–297. doi:10.1093/pan/mps028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, L., K. Mays, S. Lai, M. Jalal, P. Ishwar, and M. Betke. 2019. “Accurate, fast, but not always cheap: evaluating “crowdcoding” as an alternative approach to analyze social Media Data.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 107769901989143), 97 (3): 811–834. doi:10.1177/1077699019891437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, L., and C. Vargo. 2020. ““Fake News” and emerging online media ecosystem: An integrated intermedia agenda-setting analysis of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.” Communication Research 47 (2): 178–200. doi:10.1177/0093650218777177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haim, M. 2020. “Agent-based Testing: An automated approach toward artificial reactions to human behavior.” Journalism Studies 21 (7): 895–911. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2019.1702892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp, F. R., J. A. Schaffer, J. T. Fisher, and R. Weber. 2019. “iCoRe: The GDELT Interface for the Advancement of Communication Research.” Computational Communication Research 1 (1): 13–44. –13–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J. 2016. “An introduction to digital media research methods: How to research and the implications of new media data.” Communication Research and Practice 2 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1080/22041451.2016.1155307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurafsky, D., and J. H. Martin. 2018. Speech and Language Processing. An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/.
   Google Scholar
• Kananovich, V. 2018. “Framing the taxation-democratization link: An automated content analysis of cross-national newspaper data.” The International Journal of Press/Politics, 1940161218771893. 23 (2): 247–267. doi:10.1177/1940161218771893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 2019. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, H., C. Howard, and H. M. Hapke. 2019. Natural Language Processing In Action: Understanding, Analyzing, And Generating text with Python. Shelter Island: Manning Publications Co.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A. 2019. “Spatial dialectics: Pursuing geospatial imaginaries with word embedding models and mapping.” Modernism/Modernity Print Plus 4 (2), doi:10.26597/mod.0116.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, M., K. Benoit, and J. Garry. 2003. “Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data.” American Political Science Review 97 (2): 311–331. doi:10.1017/S0003055403000698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazer, D., A. Pentland, L. Adamic, S. Aral, A.-L. Barabási, D. Brewer, … M. V. Alstyne. 2009. “Computational social science.” Science 323 (5915): 721–723. doi:10.1126/science.1167742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. C., R. Zamith, and A. Hermida. 2013. “Content Analysis in an Era of Big Data: A Hybrid approach to computational and manual methods.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 57 (1): 34–52. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.761702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, F., J.-M. Eberl, T. Heidenreich, and H. G. Boomgaarden. 2019. “When the journey is as important as the Goal: A roadmap to multilingual dictionary construction.” International Journal of Communication 13: 4000–4020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B. 2015. Sentiment Analysis: Mining Opinions, Sentiments, and Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, C., R. Nielsen, M. Roberts, B. Stewart, A. Storer, and D. Tingley. 2015. “Computer assisted text analysis for comparative politics.” Political Analysis 23 (2): 254–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, C., and D. Tingley. 2014. TranslateR: Bindings for the Google and Microsoft Translation APIs (Version 1.0) [R]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=translateR.
   Google Scholar
• Lukito, J., J. Suk, Y. Zhang, L. Doroshenko, S. J. Kim, M.-H. Su, … C. Wells. 2019. “The Wolves in Sheep’s clothing: How Russia’s Internet Research Agency Tweets Appeared in U.S. News as Vox Populi.” The International Journal of Press/Politics, 194016121989521. 25 (2): 196–216. doi:10.1177/1940161219895215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid-Morales, D. 2018. “African News with Chinese Characteristics: A Case Study of CGTN Africa.” (PhD Thesis, City University of Hong Kong). Retrieved from http://lbms03.cityu.edu.hk/theses/ftt/phd-com-23837390.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McEnery, T., and A. Hardie. 2012. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory And Practice. Cambridge . New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, T. 2019. “Detecting Textual Reuse in News Stories, At Scale.” International Journal of Communication 13: 4173–4197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquale, F. 2015. The Black box society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money And Information. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Possler, D., S. Bruns, and J. Niemann-Lenz. 2019. “Data Is the New Oil—But How Do We Drill It? Pathways to Access and Acquire Large Data Sets in Communication Science.” International Journal of Communication 13: 3894–3911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proksch, S.-O., W. Lowe, J. Wäckerle, and S. Soroka. 2019. “Multilingual Sentiment Analysis: A New Approach to Measuring Conflict in Legislative Speeches.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 44 (1): 97–131. doi:10.1111/lsq.12218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.4.3). Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, U. 2019. “Overcoming language barriers: Assessing the potential of machine translation and topic modeling for the comparative analysis of multilingual text corpora.” Communication Methods and Measures 13 (02): 102–125. doi:10.1080/19312458.2018.1555798.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. E., B. M. Stewart, D. Tingley, C. Lucas, J. Leder-Luis, S. K. Gadarian, … D. G. Rand. 2014. “Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 1064–1082. doi:10.1111/ajps.12103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silge, J., and D. Robinson. 2016. “Tidytext: Text mining and analysis using tidy data principles in R.” The Journal of Open Source Software 1 (3), doi:10.21105/joss.00037.
   Google Scholar
• Snelson, C. L. 2016. “Qualitative and mixed methods social media research: A review of the literature.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 15 (1): 160940691562457. 15 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1177/1609406915624574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S., L. Young, and M. Balmas. 2015. “Bad News or Mad News? Sentiment scoring of negativity, fear, and anger in news content.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 659 (1): 108–121. doi:10.1177/0002716215569217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spirling, A., and P. L. Rodriguez. 2019. Word Embeddings What works, what doesn’t, and how to tell the difference for applied research. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Trilling, D., and J. G. F. Jonkman. 2018. “Scaling up content analysis.” Communication Methods and Measures 12 (2–3): 158–174. doi:10.1080/19312458.2018.1447655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, G., and R. Wodak 2007. Critical discourse analysis theory and interdisciplinarity. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Welbers, K., W. Van Atteveldt, and K. Benoit. 2017. “Text Analysis in R.” Communication Methods and Measures 11 (4): 245–265. doi:10.1080/19312458.2017.1387238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, D. C., R. S. Sumpter, and D. McQuail. 2004. “News media production: Individuals, organizations and institutions.” In The SAGE handbook of media studies, edited by J. Downing, D. McQuail, P. Schlesinger, and E. Wartella, 393–410. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Young, L., and S. Soroka. 2012. “Affective News: The automated coding of sentiment in political texts.” Political Communication 29 (2): 205–231. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.671234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamith, R. 2017. “Capturing and analyzing liquid content: A computational process for freezing and analyzing mutable documents.” Journalism Studies 18 (12): 1489–1504. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2016.1146083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., and B. Liu. 2017. “Sentiment Analysis and opinion mining.” In Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining, edited by C. Sammut , and G. I. Webb , 1152–1161. Boston: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1_907
   Google Scholar