The Historicity of Media Regulation in Zambia; Examining the Proposed Statutory Self-Regulation

References

• Aimufua, Eghosa Godwin. 2007. Press and National Integration: Analysis of the Role of the Nigerian Press in the Promotion of Nigerian National Identity. (Doctoral Dissertation). Cardiff: Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2012. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bucy, E. P., W. Gantz, and Z. Wang. 2007. “Media Technology and the 24-Hour News Cycle.” In Communication Technology and Social Change: Theory and Implications, edited by C. A. Lin, and D. J. Atkin, 143–163. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Chama, B. 2014. “Press Freedom in Zambia: A Study of ‘The Post Newspaper and Professional Practice in Political Context.” (Doctoral dissertation). Roehampton University.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 1996. The search for meanings; Grounded theory. In (ed.) Rethinking methods in psychology. London: Sage Publications. pp. 27-49.
   Google Scholar
• Chirwa, C. 1996. Press freedom in Zambia. Lusaka: Zambia Independent Media Association.
   Google Scholar
• Christians, C. G., T. Glasser, D. McQuail, K. Nordenstreng, and R. A. White. 2010. Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen-Almagor, R. 2014. After Leveson: Recommendations for instituting the public and press council. The International Journal of Press/Politics 19 (2): 202–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J. 2014. “A Political Economy of Press Self-Regulation: The Case of South Africa.” Media, Culture & Society 36 (2): 167–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, D. 2012. Media regulation. In: Oxford Bibliographies Online: Communication. Accessed 20.11.2020. http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com.alpha2.latrobe.edu.au/view/document/obo-9780199756841/obo-9780199756841-0095.xml.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973. Thick description: towards an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. pp. 3–30. New York: Basic.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2006. “Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research.” Communication Theory 16 (4): 411–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D., and P. Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics (Communication, Society, and Politics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867.005.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, D. L. 1993. “The Challenge of Ethnic Conflict: Democracy in Divided Societies.” Journal of Democracy 4 (4): 18–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hulin, A. 2014. Statutory media self-regulation: beneficial or detrimental for media freedom? Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS, 127.
   Google Scholar
• Iglesias, C. n.d. Varieties of statutory regulations, LSE media policy project, Accessed 30.10.2020. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/2012/11/28/varieties-of-statutory-regulation/.
   Google Scholar
• Iorio, Sharon Hartin. 2004. Taking It to the Streets: Qualitative Research Into Journalism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kamwengo, M. K. 2009. The quest for the regulation of the media in Zambia. (Master’s Dissertation, University of Zambia) University of Zambia Institutional Repository. http://dspace.unza.zm/handle/123456789/2392
   Google Scholar
• Kanh, Si, and Elizabeth Minnich. 2005. The fox in the Henhouse: How Privatization Threatens Democracy. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kasoma, F. P. 1995. “The Role of the Independent Media in Africa’s Change to Democracy.” Media, Culture & Society 17 (4): 537–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasoma, F. P. 1998. “The State of the Press in Africa Today.” Conference session paper). International conference on women and the media, August 10-14, Lusaka, Zambia.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, B. K. 2007. “Web Site Story: An Exploratory Study of Blog use Motivations.” In Blogging, Citizenship, and the Future of Media, edited by M. Tremayne, 127–148. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. M. 2013. “News Audiences Revisited: Theorizing the Link Between Audience Motivations and News Consumption.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 57 (3): 300–317. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.816712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, S. W. 1992. Theories of Human Communication. 4th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, A. B., and C. E. Berg. 2009. “Denmark, Sweden, and Norway: Television Diversity by Duopolistic Competition and co-Regulation.” International Communication Gazette 71 (1-2): 19–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lunt, Peter K., and Sonia M. Livingstone. 2012. Media Regulation Governance and the Interests of Citizens and Consumers. Los Angeles, London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mattoni, A., and D. Ceccobelli. 2018. “Comparing Hybrid Media Systems in the Digital age: A Theoretical Framework for Analysis.” European Journal of Communication 33 (5): 540–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbaine, Adolf Emmanuel. 2020. The Challenges of Establishing a Sustainable Regulatory System for Journalists for Media Accountability to Society: A Case Study of Uganda (Doctoral Thesis). Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg (South Africa).
   Google Scholar
• MISA Zambia. 2016. How Has the media covered the 2016 pre-election period? A Summary Report by MISA Zambia & Media Liaison Committee, 2016. MISA Zambia Media Monitoring Report, Lusaka: MISA Zambia.
   Google Scholar
• Mushingeh, C. 1994. “Unrepresentative ‘Democracy’: One-Party Rule in Zambia, 1973-1990.” Transafrican Journal of History 23: 117–141.
   Google Scholar
• Mutsvairo, B. 2018. The Palgrave Handbook of Media and Communication Research in Africa. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ndawana, Y. 2012. “An Evaluation of the Media Coverage of the 2011 General Elections in Zambia: A Case Study of the Zambia National Broadcasting Corporation, Muvi TV, Times of Zambia and the Post Newspaper.” (Master’s Thesis). University of Zambia. http://dspace.unza.zm:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/1812/YOUNGSON_NDAWANA20FINAL20DISSERTATION.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Nerone, J. 1995. “Social Responsibility Theory.” In Last Rights: Revisiting Four Theories of the Press, edited by William E. Berry. Vol. 148, 77–124. University of Illinois press.
   Google Scholar
• Phiri, I. 1999. “Media in” Democratic” Zambia: Problems and Prospects.” Africa Today 46 (2): 53–65.
   Google Scholar
• Pitts, G. 2000. “Democracy and Press Freedom in Zambia: Attitudes of Members of Parliament Toward Media and Media Regulation.” Communication Law and Policy 5 (2): 269–294.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. E., and P. Krug. 2002. The Enabling Environment for Free and Independent Media. Oxford: Programme in Comparative Media and Policy. Human cities. Accessed 10.10.20. http://www.uirs.si/pub/humancities2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rajkhowa, A. 2015. “The Spectre of Censorship: Media Regulation, Political Anxiety, and Public Contestations in India (2011–2013).” Media, Culture & Society 37 (6): 867–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. M., and N. Crossley, eds. 2004. After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, W. 1997. “Changes of Mass Media and the Public Sphere.” Javnost - The Public 4 (2): 57–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simutanyi, N., A. Fraser, and N. Milapo. 2015. Background Paper: Politics and Interactive Media in Zambia.
   Google Scholar
• Van Cuilenburg, J., and D. McQuail. 2003. “Media Policy Paradigm Shifts: Towards a New Communications Policy Paradigm.” European Journal of Communication 18 (2): 181–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar