The Rise of Peripheral Actors in Media Regulation in South Africa: An Entry of Social Media Mob(s)

References

• Altmann, S. A. 1956. “Avian Mobbing Behavior and Predator Recognition.” The Condor 58 (4): 241–253.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R., and M. Cave. 1999. Understanding Regulation. Theory, Strategy and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, F. 2018. “Social Media Have Been Captured by Elitists, Demagogues, and Mobs. Science and Technology.” National Review. (14/11/2018).
   Google Scholar
• Berger, G. 2010. “The Struggle for Press Self-Regulation in Contemporary South Africa: Charting a Course Between an Industry Charade and a Government Doormat.” Communicatio 36 (3): 289–308.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, C. 2000. Media Ethics and Accountability Systems. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Binns, A. 2012. “Don’t Feed the Trolls! Managing Troublemakers in Magazines’ Online Communities.” Journalism Practice 6 (4): 547–562.
   Google Scholar
• Botma, G. J. 2014. “The Press Freedom Commission in South Africa and the Regulation of Journalists Online: Lessons from Britain and Australia.” Communicatio 40 (3): 223–238.
   Google Scholar
• Cheruiyot, David. 2017. “Do Bloggers Who Criticize the Press Ultimately Matter? (Re)defining Media Accountability in the Age of Citizen Participation.” Comunicació: Revista de Recerca i d’Anàlisi [Societat Catalana de Comunicació] 34 (1): 107–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheruiyot, D. 2019. Criticising Journalism: Popular Media Criticism in the Digital Age. Karlstads: Karlstads University.
   Google Scholar
• Citron, D. K. 2009. “Civil Rights in the Cyber World.” JD Alumni Magazine. Digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Citron, D. K. 2014. Hate Crimes in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. D. 2006. Watching the Watchdog: Bloggers as the Fifth Estate. Spokane, WA: Marquette Books.
   Google Scholar
• Duran, A. 2006. “Flash Mobs: Social Influence in the 21st Century.” Social Influence 1 (4): 301–315.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, W. H. 2009. “The Fifth Estate Emerging Through the Network of Networks.” Prometheus 27 (1): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Eizenstat, S. E. 2004. “Nongovernmental Organizations as the Fifth Estate.” Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 5: 15.
   Google Scholar
• Fengler, S. 2012. “From Media Self-Regulation to Crowd-Criticism: Media Accountability in the Digital Age.” Central European Journal of Communication 5 (2): 175–189.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, S. 2011. “Whose Freedom? South Africa’s Press, Middle-Class Bias and the Threat of Control.” Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies 32 (2): 106–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golf-Papez, M., and E. Veer. 2017. “Don’t Feed the Trolling: Rethinking How Online Trolling is Being Defined and Combated.” Journal of Marketing Management 33 (15-16): 1336–1354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gracia, A., B. Cruz, and M. Rex. 2018. “Trolling in Online Communities: A Practice-Based Theoretical Perspective.” The Information Society 34 (1): 15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, D. 2018. “The Social Media Mob is a Danger to Society. Opinion.” The Washington Post. July 12.
   Google Scholar
• Han, R. 2015. “Manufacturing Consent in Cyberspace: China's “Fifty-Cent Army”.” Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 44 (2): 105–134.
   Google Scholar
• Hands, J. 2014. “General Intellect or Collective Idiocy? Digital Mobs and Social Media Mobilization.” Popular Communication: The International Journal of Media and Culture 12 (4): 237–250.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. S. 2008. Press Critics are Not the Fifth Estate: Media Watchdogs in America. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann, P. P. 1973. Mobbing. Gruppevold blant barn og voksne. Oslo: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Hua, W. 2017. “Cybermobs, Civil Conspiracy, and Tort Liability.” Fordham Urban Law Journal 44 (4): 1217–1266.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, A. 2018. “Social Media Mobs are Worse for Society Than the People They Shame.” https://thenextweb.com/news/social-media-mobs-are-worse-for-society-than-the-people-they-shame.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, B., D. Schoch, S. Stier, and J. Yang. 2020. “Political Astroturfing on Twitter: How to Coordinate a Disinformation Campaign.” Political Communication 37 (2): 256–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, F. 2021. “False Story About Decuplets Was a Low Point for Journalism: How to Fix the Damage.” The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/false-story-about-decuplets-was-a-low-point-for-journalism-how-to-fix-the-damage-163814.
   Google Scholar
• Krumsiek, A. 2018. Cyber Mobs: Destructive Online Communities. New York: Lucent Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, S. 2017. Cyber Mobs: A Model for Improving Protections for Internet Users. New York: Utica College.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. C., R. Zamith, and M. Coddington. 2020. “Online Harassment and Its Implications for Journalist-Audience Relationship.” Digital Journalism 8 (8): 1047–1067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leymann, H. 1990. “Mobbing and Psychological Terror at Workplaces.” Violence and Victims 5 (x): 119–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Little, A. D. 1924. “The Fifth Estate.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 16 (11): 1105–1110.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, D. 2003. Accountability and Freedom of Publication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhudwana, R. F. 2020. “#Zuma Must Fall This Ruary: Homophily on the Echo-Chambers of Political Leaders’ Twitter Accounts.” In Social Media and Elections in Africa. Vol. 2, edited by M. Ndlela and W. Mano, 175–202. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. M. 2015. “Social Media and the Public Interest: Governance of News Platforms in the Realm of Individual and Algorithmic Gatekeepers.” Telecommunications Policy 39 (X): 751–760.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, J. 2017. “Social Media: Freedom of Expression, and Media Regulation and Policy.” In Media Studies: Social (New) Media and Mediated Communication Today, edited by P. Fourie. South Africa: Juta.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, J., G. Daniels, and K. Skinner. 2020. “Media Freedom in South Africa Today: Unravelling Multifarious Threats Towards a Research and Advocacy Response.” Communicatio 46 (4): 2–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. 2002. Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. Perseus Pub., Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Sampaio-Dias, S., H. M. Mabweazara, J. Townend, and I. Osman. 2019. “Practices, Policies and Regulation in African Journalism: Mapping a Research Agenda.” African Journalism Studies 40 (3): 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindane, S. 2018. “Press Regulation in South Africa and Its Implications for Press Freedom.” Communicatus 23 (X): 155–164.
   Google Scholar
• Solmone, S. 2018. “Regulate Social Media? It’s More Complicated Than That.” The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/regulate-social-media-its-a-bit-more-complicated-than-that103797.
   Google Scholar
• Trottier, D. 2017. “Digital Vigilantism as Weaponisation of Visibility.” Philosophy and Technology 30 (1): 55–72.
   Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. 2020. “Mob Censorship: Online Harassment of US Journalists in Times of Digital Hate and Populism.” Digital Journalism 8 (8): 1030–1046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, H. 2020. “The State of South African Media: A Space to Contest Democracy.” Publizistik 65 (x): 451–465.
   Google Scholar