Anisotropic turbulent model based on V2f model for natural and mixed convection in enclosed spaces

References

• Betts, P.L., and I.H. Bokhari. 2000. Experiments on turbulent natural convection in an enclosed tall cavity. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 2:675–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blay, D., S. Mergui, and C. Niculae. 1992. Confined turbulent mixed convection in the presence of a horizontal buoyant wall jet. Fundamentals of Mixed Convection, HTD 213:65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., and Z. Jiang. 1992. Significant questions in predicting room air motion. ASHRAE Transactions 98(1):929–39.
   Google Scholar
• Chieng, C.C., and B.E. Launder. 1980. On the calculation of turbulent heat transport down-stream from an abrupt pipe expansion. Numerical Heat Transfer 3:189–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, J.J., L.A. Oliveira, and D. Blay. 1999. Test of several versions for the k-ϵ type turbulence modelling of internal mixed convection flows. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 42:4391–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, L., P.V. Nielsen, and A. Sveningsson. 2003. Modification of the V2f model for computing the flow in a 3D wall jet. Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer 4:577–84.
   Google Scholar
• Durbin, P.A. 1991. Near-wall turbulence closure modeling without damping functions. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 3(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, M.M., and B.E. Launder. 1978. Ground effects on pressure fluctuations in the atmospheric boundary layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 86:491–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinze, J.O. 1975. Turbulence. Chapter 1, General introduction and concepts, pp. 1–82. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Launder, B.E., and B.I. Sharma. 1974. Application of the energy dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disk. Letters in Heat Mass Transfer 1:131–8.
   Google Scholar
• Launder, B.E., and D.B. Spalding. 1974. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 3:269–89.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., and S. Zeng. 2012. Progresses and needs in cabin environment research of transport vehicles. Building and Environment 47:3–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menter, F.R. 1994. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal 32(8):1598–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami, S., S. Kato, T. Chikamoto, D. Laurence, and D. Blay. 1996. New low-Reynolds-number k-8 model including damping effect due to buoyancy in a stratified flow field. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 39(16):3483–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagano, Y., and M. Tagawa. 1990. An improved k-ϵ model for boundary layer flows. Journal of Fluids Engineering 112:33–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwstadt, F.T.M. 1990. Direct and large-eddy simulation of free convection. Proceedings of the 9th International Heat Transfer Conference, Jerusalem, Israel, August 19–24, pp. 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M., and Q.Y. Chen. 2010. On a hybrid RANS/LES approach for indoor airflow modeling (RP-1271). Science and Technology for the Built Environment 16(6):731–47.
   Google Scholar
• Yakhot, V., and S.A. Orszag. 1986. Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. Journal of Scientific Computing 1(1):3–51.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai, J.Z., Z. Zhang, W. Zhang, and Y.Q. Chen. 2007. Evaluation of various turbulence models in predicting airflow and turbulence in enclosed environments by CFD: Part 1—Summary of prevalent turbulence models. Science and Technology for the Built Environment 13(6):853–70.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Z.Q. Zhai, W. Zhang, and Q. Chen. 2007. Evaluation of various turbulence models in predicting airflow and turbulence in enclosed environments by CFD: Part 2—Comparison with experimental data from literature. Science and Technology for the Built Environment 13(6):871–86.
   Google Scholar