Optimization of energy consumption and daylight performance in residential building regarding windows design in hot and dry climate of Isfahan

References

• Acosta, I., M. Á. Campano, and J. F. Molina. 2016. Window design in architecture: Analysis of energy savings for lighting and visual comfort in residential spaces. Applied Energy 168:493–506. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, M., A. Abdel-Rahman, M. Bady, E. Mahrous, and M. Suzuki. 2016. Optimum energy consumption by using kinetic shading system for residential buildings in hot arid areas. International Journal of Smart Grid and Clean Energy 5 (2):121–8.
   Google Scholar
• Alam, M., H. Jamil, J. Sanjayan, and J. Wilson. 2014. Energy saving potential of phase change materials in major Australian cities. Energy and Buildings 78:192–201. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral, A. R., E. Rodrigues, A. Rodrigues Gaspar, and Á. Gomes. 2016. A thermal performance parametric study of window type, orientation, size and shadowing effect. Sustainable Cities and Society 26:456–65. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2016.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsenault, H., M. Hébert, and M.-C. Dubois. 2012. Effects of glazing colour type on perception of daylight quality, arousal, and switch-on patterns of electric light in office rooms. Building and Environment 56:223–31. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.02.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aste, N., M. Buzzetti, C. Del Pero, and F. Leonforte. 2018. Glazing’s techno-economic performance: A comparison of window features in office buildings in different climates. Energy and Buildings 159:123–35. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atzeri, A. M., A. Gasparella, F. Cappelletti, and A. Tzempelikos. 2018. Comfort and energy performance analysis of different glazing systems coupled with three shading control strategies. Science and Technology for the Built Environment 24 (5):545–58. doi:10.1080/23744731.2018.1449517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari, N., and A. M. Sundaram. 2019. Optimization of windows for daylighting and energy consumption for south facade in office building in hot and dry climate of India. In Research into design for a connected world, ed. Chakrabarti and Amaresh, 307–20. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Castro-Lacouture, D., J. A. Sefair, L. Flórez, and A. L. Medaglia. 2009. Optimization model for the selection of materials using a LEED-based green building rating system in Colombia. Building and Environment 44 (6):1162–70. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, D. A., D. Moreno, P. M. Esquivias, and J. Navarro. 2017. Optimization method for perforated solar screen design to improve daylighting using orthogonal arrays and climate-based daylight modelling. Journal of Building Performance Simulation 10 (2):144–60. doi:10.1080/19401493.2016.1197969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIBSE. 1999. Lighting Guide 10: Daylighting and Window Design, Charted Institution of Building Services Engineers, London.
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, D., P. Raftery, and M. Keane. 2014. A review of methods to match building energy simulation models to measured data. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 37:123–41. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A., and S. Neogi. 2018. Effect of fenestration geometrical factors on building energy consumption and performance evaluation of a new external solar shading device in warm and humid climatic condition. Solar Energy 169:94–104. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2018.04.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giarma, C., K. Tsikaloudaki, and D. Aravantinos. 2017. Daylighting and visual comfort in buildings’ environmental performance assessment tools: A critical review. Procedia Environmental Sciences 38:522–9. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.116.
   Google Scholar
• Iranian National Standard Organization. 2012. Standards for energy consuming equipment. Accessed September 19, 2019. http://www.isiri.gov.ir/Portal/Home/.
   Google Scholar
• Jelle, B. P., A. Hynd, A. Gustavsen, D. Arasteh, H. Goudey, and R. Hart. 2012. Fenestration of today and tomorrow: A state-of-the-art review and future research opportunities. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 96:1–28. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2011.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, M.-T., C.-H. Yeh, and J.-T. Jian. 2013. Analysis of building energy consumption parameters and energy savings measurement and verification by applying eQUEST software. Energy and Buildings 61:100–7. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kini, P., N. K. Garg, and K. Kamath. 2017. Exploring energy conservation in office buildings with thermal comfort criterion towards sustainable new developments in warm and humid climate. Energy Procedia 111:277–86. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.029.
   Google Scholar
• Kurnia, K. A., D. N. Azizah, R. A. Mangkuto, and R. T. Atmodipoero. 2017. Visual comfort assessment using high dynamic range images under daylight condition in the Main Library Building of Institut Teknologi Bandung. Procedia Engineering 170:234–9. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.056.
   Google Scholar
• Mardaljevic, J. 2015. Climate-based daylight modelling and its discontents. London: CIBSE Technical Symposium.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, J. 2017. Batay-Csorba animates facades of Toronto townhouses with angled windows. Accessed June 2020. https://www.dezeen.com/2017/09/05/core-modern-homes-batay-csorba-architects-townhouses-angled-windows-toronto/?li_source=LI&li_medium=rhs_block_1.
   Google Scholar
• Misiopecki, C., M. Bouquin, A. Gustavsen, and B. P. Jelle. 2018. Thermal modeling and investigation of the most energy-efficient window position. Energy and Buildings 158:1079–86. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochoa, C. E., M. B. Aries, E. J. van Loenen, and J. L. Hensen. 2012. Considerations on design optimization criteria for windows providing low energy consumption and high visual comfort. Applied Energy 95:238–45. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ran, J., M. Tang, L. Jiang, and X. Zheng. 2017. Effect of building roof insulation measures on indoor cooling and energy saving in rural areas in Chongqing. Procedia Engineering 180:669–75. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.226.
   Google Scholar
• Shaeri, J., M. Yaghoubi, A. Habibi, and A. Chokhachian. 2019. The impact of archetype patterns in office buildings on the annual cooling, heating and lighting loads in hot-humid, hot-dry and cold climates of Iran. Sustainability 11 (2):311. doi:10.3390/su11020311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokol, N., and J. Martyniuk-Peczek. 2016. The review of the selected challenges for an incorporation of daylight assessment methods into urban planning in Poland. Procedia Engineering 161:2191–7. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.814.
   Google Scholar
• Thalfeldt, M., J. Kurnitski, and H. Voll. 2016. Detailed and simplified window model and opening effects on optimal window size and heating need. Energy and Buildings 127:242–51. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• juul-hansen, T. thomas juul-hansen, llc. Last Modified August 12, 2019. Accessed June 10, 2020. http://www.thomasjuulhansen.com/505-west-19th-st.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasetti, T. 2019. Design explorer. http://tt-acm.github.io/DesignExplorer.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhoutteghem, L., G. Cecilie Jensen Skarning, C. Anker Hviid, and S. Svendsen. 2015. Impact of façade window design on energy, daylighting and thermal comfort in nearly zero-energy houses. Energy and Buildings 102:149–56. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.05.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, N., and A. Jain. 2018. Optimized automatic lighting control in a hotel building for energy efficiency. Paper presented at the 2018 International Conference on Power Energy, Environment and Intelligent Control (PEEIC), India. doi:10.1109/PEEIC.2018.8665417.
   Google Scholar
• Vijayan, A., and A. Kumar. 2005. A review of tools to assess the sustainability in building construction. Environmental Progress 24 (2):125–32. doi:10.1002/ep.10065.
   Google Scholar
• Yazhari Kermani, A., F. Nasrollahi, and M. Mahdavinejad. 2018. Investigation of the relationship between depth of overhang and amount of daylight indicators in office buildings of Kerman city. Environmental Health Engineering and Management 5 (3):129–36. doi:10.15171/EHEM.2018.18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J., C. Yang, and L. Tian. 2008. Low-energy envelope design of residential building in hot summer and cold winter zone in China. Energy and Buildings 40 (8):1536–46. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.02.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar