Design, fabrication and computational simulation of a bio-kinetic façade inspired by the mechanism of the Lupinus Succulentus plant for daylight and energy efficiency

References

• Aksamija, A. 2011. Methods for integrating parametric design with building performance analysis. https://www.arcc-journal.org/index.php/repository/article/view/459/363.
   Google Scholar
• Aquilio, A. D., R. Sileryte, D. Yang, and M. Turrin. 2016. Simulating natural ventilation in large sports buildings. Prediction of temperature and airflow patterns in the early design stages. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design, simAUD. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:f6f90754-f934-42c2-91cf-e4dde827c1f8.
   Google Scholar
• ASHRAE. 2006. 4 – Architectural design impacts. In The ASHRAE green guide, 2nd ed., 55–72. Burlington: Butterworth-Heinemann. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781933742076500074
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, C., and S. Wittkopf. 2015. Annual daylight simulations with EvalDRC – Assessing the performance of daylight redirection components. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering 3 (3-4):253–72. doi:10.3233/FDE-160044
   Google Scholar
• Betti, G., M. G. Kent, W. H. Ko, S. Schiavon, and B. Levitt. 2022. A window view quality assessment framework. LEUKOS 18 (3):268–93. doi:10.1080/15502724.2021.1965889
   Google Scholar
• Bhusal, P., L. Halonen, and E. Tetri, eds. 2010. Energy efficient electric lighting for buildings. ECBCS – Energy Conservation Building Community Systems, International Energy Agency. Aalto University School of Science and Technology. https://nachhaltigwirtschaften.at/resources/iea_pdf/ecbcs_annex_45_guidebook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brembilla, E., and J. Mardaljevic. 2019. Climate-based daylight modelling for compliance verification: Benchmarking multiple state-of-the-art methods. Building and Environment 158:151–64. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.04.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chantrasrisalai, C., D. E. Fisher, V. Ghatti, and D. G. Scheatzle. 2003. Experimental validation of the energy plus low-temperature radiant simulation. ASHRE Transactions. vol. 109, No. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Christoffersen, J., and J. Wienold. 2006. Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy and Buildings 38 (7):743–57. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.017
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R., and W. Zuk. 1970. Kinetic architecture, 14–27. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
   Google Scholar
• Correa, D., A. Menges, and S. Reichert. 2015. Meteorosensitive architecture: Biomimetic building skins based on materially embedded and hygroscopically enabled responsiveness. Computer-Aided Design 60:50–69. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2014.02.010
   Google Scholar
• Croxford, B., M. López, R. Rubio, and S. Martín. 2017. How plants inspire façades. From plants to architecture: Biomimetic principles for the development of adaptive architectural envelopes. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 67:692–703. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.018
   Google Scholar
• Elwy, I., Y. Ibrahim, M. Fahmy, and M. Mahdy. 2018. Outdoor microclimatic validation for hybrid simulation workflow in hot arid climates against ENVI-met and field measurements. Energy Procedia.153:29–34. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.009
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, D., G. Goldmann, T. Kloth, H. Tributsch, and M. Zähr. 2010. Bionic photovoltaic panels bio-inspired by green leaves. Journal of Bionic Engineering 7 (3):284–93. doi:10.1016/S1672-6529(10)60252-1
   Google Scholar
• Frosch, R. A., and N. E. Gallopoulos. 1989. Strategies for manufacturing. Scientific American 261 (3):144–52. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0989-144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galasiu, A. D., G. R. Newsham, D. Sander, and C. Suvagau. 2007. Energy saving lighting control systems for open-plan offices: A field study. LEUKOS (The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America) 4 (1):7–29. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1582/LEUKOS.2007.04.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, P. 2011. Biomimetics in architecture – The architecture of life and buildings. Vienna: Springer. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0332-6
   Google Scholar
• Hansanuwat, R., and K. Kensek. 2011. Environment control systems for sustainable design: A methodology for testing, simulating and comparing kinetic facade systems. Journal of Creative Sustainable Architecture & Built Environment, CSABE 1:27–45.
   Google Scholar
• Heidari, S., Z. Jalali, and E. Noorzai. 2019. Design and optimization of form and facade of an office building using the genetic algorithm. Science and Technology for the Built Environment 26 (2):128–40. doi:10.1080/23744731.2019.1624095
   Google Scholar
• Heidari, S., and A. Montaser Koohsari. 2022. Subdivided venetian blind control strategies considering visual satisfaction of occupants, daylight metrics, and energy analyses. Energy and Buildings 257:111767. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111767
   Google Scholar
• Henze, N., S. Misara, and A. Sidelev. 2011. Thermal Characteristics of BIPV (U-value and g-value). Society-ISES-: 30th ISES Biennial Solar World Congress 2011. 3:2380–2391.
   Google Scholar
• Heracleous, C., and A. Michael. 2017. Assessment of natural lighting performance and visual comfort of educational architecture in Southern Europe: The case of typical educational school premises in Cyprus. Energy and Buildings 140:443–57. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.087
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, T., R. Krippner, and W. Lang. 2004. Façade construction manual. Basel: Birkhauser, Publishers for Architectures.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S. M., M. Mohammadi, A. Rosemann, T. Schröder, and J. Lichtenberg. 2019. A morphological approach for kinetic façade design process to improve visual and thermal comfort: Review. Building and Environment 153:186–204. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaçel, S., and A. Köknel Yener. 2008. The effect of façade design on lighting energy consumption in offices: A case study in Turin, Italy. Architectural Science Review 51 (4):360–8. doi:10.3763/asre.2008.5140
   Google Scholar
• Knippers, J., J. Lienhard, T. Masselter, M. Milwich, S. Poppinga, S. Schleicher, and T. Speck. 2011. Flectofin: A hingeless flapping mechanism inspired by nature. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 6 (4):045001. doi:10.1088/1748-3182/6/4/045001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahdavinejad, M., and S. Mohammadi. 2016. Parametric optimization of daylight and thermal performance through louvers in hot and dry climate of Tehran. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences 8 (3):1221–36. doi:10.4314/jfas.v8i3.32
   Google Scholar
• Mardaljevic, J., and A. Nabil. 2006. Useful daylight illuminances: A replacement for daylight factors. Energy and Buildings 38 (7):905–13. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C., and J. Wienold. 2009. Daysim 3.0 – DDS, New validation study and annual daylight glare probability schedules. 8th International Radiance Work shop-Harvard Design School.
   Google Scholar
• Roetzel, A., A. Tabadkani, H. Xian Li, and A. Tsangrassoulis. 2021. Design approaches and typologies of adaptive facades: A review. Automation in Construction 121:103450. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103450
   Google Scholar
• Taiz, L., and E. Zieger. 2006. Plant physiology. 4th ed. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates. Inc.
   Google Scholar