References
- Argomaniz, J. (2010) When the EU is the ‘norm-taker’: The passenger name records agreement and the EU's internalization of US border security norms, in: S. Wolff, N. Wichmann & G. Mounier (Eds) The External Dimension of Justice and Home Affairs, pp. 117–113 (New York: Routledge).
- Brants, K. & Voltmer, K. (2011) Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy, Challenging the Primacy of Politics (Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan).
- Chandler, J. (2009) Privacy versus national security, clarifying the trade-off, in: I. Kerr, V. Steeves & C. Lucock (Eds) Lessons from the Identity Trail, Anonymity, Privacy and Identity in a Networked Society, pp. 121–138 (New York: Oxford University Press).
- Entman, R. M. (1993) Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm, Journal of Communication, 43(4), pp. 51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
- European Parliament. (2001) Report on the Existence of a Global System for the Interception of Private and Commercial Communications (ECHELON interception system) (2001/2098(INI)), FINAL, A4-0264/2001, Brussels.
- Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge (London: Tavistock).
- Frohmann, B. (1992) The power of images: A discourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint, Journal of Documentation, 48(4), pp. 365–386. doi: 10.1108/eb026904
- Grabe, M. E. & Page Bucy, E. (2009) Image Bite Politics (New York: Oxford University Press).
- Hajer, M. (2005) Coalitions, practices, and meaning in environmental politics: From acid rain to BSE, in: D. Howard & J. Torfing (Eds) Discourse Theory in European politics: Identity, Policy and Governance, pp. 297–315 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
- Hajer, M. A. (2006) Doing discourse analysis: coalitions, practices, meaning, in: M. van den Brink & T. Metze (Eds) Words matter in policy and planning: Discourse theory and method in the social sciences, pp. 65–74 (Utrecht: NETHUR).
- Hariman, R. & Lucaites, J. L. (2002) Performing civic identity: The iconic photograph of the flag raising on Iwo Jima, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 88(4), pp. 363–392. doi: 10.1080/00335630209384385
- Huddy, L. & Gunnthorsdottir, A. H. (2000) The Persuasive Effects of Emotive Visual Imagery: Superficial Manipulation or the Product of Passionate Reason, Political Psychology, 21(4), pp. 745–778. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00215
- Kingdon, J. W. (2003) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers/Longman).
- Koops, E. J. (2010) Law, technology, and shifting power relations, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 25(2), pp. 973–1035.
- Maalej, Z. (1999) Metaphor making and processing, Journal of Literary Semantics, 28(2), pp. 105–123. doi: 10.1515/jlse.1999.28.2.105
- Norton, M. I. & Goethals, G. R. (2004) Spin (and pitch) doctors: Campaign strategies in televised political debates, Political Behavior, 26(3), pp. 227–248. doi: 10.1023/B:POBE.0000043454.25971.6a
- Rees, W. (2006) Transatlantic Counter-terrorism Cooperation. The New Imperative (Abingdon: Routledge).
- Rosen, C. (2005) The image culture in the new Atlantis, The New Atlantis, a Journal of Technology & Society, 2005(10), pp. 27–46.
- Wilson, J. (1990) Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).