Europeanisation in Aid for Trade: the impact of capacity and socialisation

References

• Adshead, M. (2014) EU cohesion policy and multi-level governance outcomes in Ireland: How sustainable is Europeanization?, European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(4), pp. 416–431. doi: 10.1177/0969776413490426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bátora, J. (2012) Europeanization of foreign policy: Whither central Europe?, in: Z. Šabič & P. Drulák (Eds) Regional and International Relations of Central Europe, pp. 220–238 (London: Palgrave).
   Google Scholar
• Baun, M. & Marek, D. (Eds) (2013) The New Member States and the European Union: Foreign Policy and Europeanization (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• BMZ. (2011) Aid for Trade in German Development Policy (Bonn: BMZ).
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A. (2003) Environmental Leaders and Laggards in the European Union. Why There is (Not) a Southern Problem (London: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. (Ed.) (2009) Coping with Accession to the European Union. New Modes of Environmental Governance (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. (2011) When Europeanization hits limited statehood. The Western Balkans as a test case for the transformative power of Europe, KFG Working Paper Series, Free University Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A., Hofmann, T. & Panke, D. (2011) Policy Matters But How? Explaining Non-Compliance Dynamics in the EU, KFG Working Paper Series, Free University Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. & Risse, T. (2003) Conceptualising the domestic impact of Europe, in: K. Featherstone & C.M. Radaelli (Eds) The Politics of Europeanisation, pp. 57–80 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Brazys, S.R. (2013) Evidencing donor heterogeneity in Aid for Trade, Review of International Political Economy, 20(4), pp. 947–978. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2012.734254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer, S. & Paterson, W.E. (2010) Germany and the European Union: from ‘tamed power’ to normalized power?, International Affairs, 86, pp. 1051–1073.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, M. (2007) The European Union and International Development  (London: Routledge/UACES).
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, M. & Orbie, J. (2014) Beyond economic partnership agreements: The European union and the trade-development nexus, Contemporary Politics, 20(1), pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2014.882570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkel, J.T. (2005) International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework, International organization, 59(4), pp. 801–826. doi: 10.1017/S0020818305050289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2007) Conclusions of the council and of the representatives of the governments of the member states meeting within the council on EU strategy on aid for trade: Enhancing EU support for trade-related needs in developing countries, 14470/07, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2010) The development cooperation strategy of the Czech Republic 2010–2017, www.mzv.cz/file/762314/FINAL__Development_Cooperation_Strategy_2010_2017.pdf (accessed 20 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• DFAT. (2011) Ireland and Africa Our Partnership With a Changing Continent (Dublin: DFAT).
   Google Scholar
• Dochas and the Irish Congress of Trade Unions (2006) Aid for trade, Dublin, June.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2005) EU Trade policy: Main issues for the 133 Committee in the second half of 2005 (Brussels: European Commission).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2006) Joint Evaluation of Co-ordination of Trade Capacity Building in Partner Countries (Brussels: European Commission).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2008) Aid for trade monitoring report 2008, SEC(2008) 431.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2009) Aid for trade monitoring report 2009, SEC(2009) 442.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011) EU accountability report 2011 on financing for development review of progress of the EU and its member states, SEC(2011) 503.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012) Aid for trade report 2012, SWD(2012) 199.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013) Aid for trade report 2013, SWD(2013) 273.
   Google Scholar
• European Community. (2007) EU Strategy on Aid for Trade: Enhancing EU support for trade-related needs in developing countries - Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, 14470/07.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, G. & Treib, O. (2008) Three worlds of compliance or four? The EU-15 compared to the new member states, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(2), pp. 293–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Ireland. (2006) White paper on Irish aid, Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ireland. (2011) Ireland and Africa: Our partnership with a changing continent, Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ireland. (2013) One world, one future: Ireland's policy for international development, Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Haverland, M. (2006) Does the EU cause domestic developments? Improving case selection in Europeanisation research, West European Politics, 29(1), pp. 134–146. doi: 10.1080/01402380500389331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, P. (2014) Tensions in the discourse and practice of the European Union's Aid for Trade, Contemporary Politics, 20(1), pp. 90–102. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2014.881607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horký, O. (2010a) Development cooperation in the Czech foreign policy, in: M. Kořan (Ed.) Czech foreign policy analysis, pp. 347–361 (Prague: Institute of International Relations).
   Google Scholar
• Horký, O. (2010b) Policy coherence for development of the Czech republic: Case studies on migration and trade, in: P. Hoebink (Ed.) European development cooperation – In between the local and the global, pp. 223–58 (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Horký, O. (2011) The impact of the shallow Europeanisation of the ‘new’ member states on the EU's actorness: What coherence between foreign and development policy?, in: S. Gänzle, S. Grimm & D. Makhan (Eds) The European Union and Global Development: An ‘Enlightened’ Superpower in the Making?, pp. 57–73 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Hynes, W. & Holden, P. (2011) What future for the Global Aid for Trade Initiative? Towards a fair assessment of its achievements and limitations, IIIS Discussion Paper No. 421 (Dublin: Institute for International Integration Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Koran, M. (2013) Coloring it Europe? The Europeanization of Czech foreign policy, in: M. Baun & D. Marek (Eds) The New Member States and the European Union. Foreign Policy Europeanization, pp. 53–64 (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, A.O. (1997) Trade policy and economic development: how we learn, American Economic Review, 87(1), pp. 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, S. & Szent-Iványi, B. (2014) Reluctant donors? The Europeanization of international development policies in the new member states, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(6), pp. 1257–1272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelson, P. (2005) Doha for Development, Speech/05/639, Informal Meeting of EU Development Ministers, Leeds, UK, 24 October.
   Google Scholar
• Moumoutzis, K. (2011) Still fashionable yet useless? addressing problems with research on the Europeanization of foreign policy, Journal of Common Market Studies 49(3), pp. 607–629. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02146.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Němečková, T., Krylová, P. & Horký, O. (2012) Vyhodnocení programů zahraniční rozvojové spolupráce realizovaných na základě dočasné výjimky z transformace, Evaluation Report for Czech MFA.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2007) Aid for Trade at a Glance (OECD: Paris).
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009a) Donor Questionnaire on Aid for Trade: Ireland (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009b) Aid for Trade at a Glance (OECD: Paris).
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011a) Aid for Trade at a Glance (OECD: Paris).
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011b) Donor Questionnaire on Aid for Trade: Czech Republic (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013) Aid for Trade at a Glance (OECD: Paris).
   Google Scholar
• OECD CRS. (2015) Creditor Reporting System, http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?DataSetCode=CRS1 (accessed 5 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Orbie, J. & Carbone, M. (2016) Introduction: The Europeanisation of development policy, European Politics and Society, 17(1), pp. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Prowse, S. (2002) The role of international and national agencies in trade-related capacity building, World Economy, 25(9), pp. 1235–1261. doi: 10.1111/1467-9701.00490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, T., Cowles, M.G. & Caporaso, J. (2001) Europeanization and domestic change: Introduction, in: M.G. Cowles, J.A. Caporaso & T. Risse (Eds) Europeanization and domestic political change, pp. 1–20 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. (2011) Europeanisation in new member and candidate states, Living Reviews in European Governance, 6(1), pp. 5–32.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J.E. & Charlton, A. (2006) Aid for trade, International Journal of Development Issues, 5(2), pp. 1–41. doi: 10.1108/eb045861
   Google Scholar
• Theyworkforyou. (2005a) HC Deb, 7 November 2005, c3W, www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2005-11-07d.24241.h (accessed 5 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Theyworkforyou. (2005b) HC Deb, 14 November 2005, c43WS, www.theyworkforyou.com/wms/?id=2005-11-14b.43WS.1 (accessed 5 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Udvari, B. (2014) Impacts of Aid for Trade on Trade with the EU: The Role of Old and New Member States, Journal Global Policy and Governance, 3(1), pp. 77–93.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. (2006) Aid for Trade: Report on a Conference Organized by UNCTAD and Commonwealth Secretariats (UNCTAD: Geneva).
   Google Scholar
• Voionmaa, P. & Brüntrup, M. (2009) German Aid for Trade: Past Experience, Lessons Learnt, and the Way Forward (Bonn: German Development Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Wong, R. (2007) Foreign Policy, in: P. Graziano, & M. Vink (Eds) Europeanization: New Research Agendas (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Waisová, S. (2011) The Czech republic and foreign development cooperation: From donor to recipient and back, in: C. Ladislav & S. Waisová (Eds) Czechoslovakia and the Czech Republic in World Politics, pp. 87–105 (Lanham: Lexington).
   Google Scholar
• WTO. (2005a) Ministerial Declaration, WT/MIN(05)/DEC, 22 December, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• WTO. (2005b) EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Statement by Right Honourable Peter Mandelson Commissioner for Trade. WT/MIN(05)/ST/5, 14 December, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• WTO. (2005c) GERMANY Statement by HE Dr Bernd Pfaffenbach State Secretary, Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology. WT/MIN(05)/ST/12, 14 December, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• WTO. (2005d) IRELAND Statement by HE Mr Michael Ahern Minister for Trade and Commerce, WT/MIN(05)/ST/96, 14 December, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• WTO. (2006) Recommendations of the Task Force on Aid for Trade, WT/AFT/1, 27 July, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A.R. (2014) The value of pointillism? Integrating trade and development and the European union as a global actor, Contemporary Politics, 20(1), pp. 118–126. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2014.881608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar